United States of America v. Peter Ma

Filing 25

Final Judgment Upon Complaint toRecover Erroneous Tax Refund by Judge John F. Walter. Based on the Stipulation for Final JudgmentUpon Complaint to Recover Erroneous Tax Refund 24 and good cause appearingthereon, that judgment is entered in favor o f plaintiff United States of America and against defendant Peter Ma in the principal sum of $118,218.00 plus statutory interest of $10,588.01 accrued through July 1, 2013, plus interest accruing under 26 USC section 6602 at the rate set for th in 26 USC section 6621 after 7/1/2013, until the principal sum is paid in full. This order shall constitute the final judgment in this action. Defendant has waived his right to appeal this judgment. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over defendant and this matter for the purpose of enforcement of this judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division DANIEL LAYTON (SBN 240763) Assistant United States Attorney Room 7211, Federal Building 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 T: (213) 894-6165 F: (213) 894-0115 Daniel.Layton@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States of America 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 JS-6 PETER MA, Defendant. 16 17 ) Case No. CV12-9559-JFW (FMOx) ) Final Judgment Upon Complaint to ) Recover Erroneous Tax Refund ) ) ) ) ) 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based on the Stipulation for Final Judgment 19 20 Upon Complaint to Recover Erroneous Tax Refund, and good cause appearing 21 thereon, that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff United States of America and 22 against defendant Peter Ma in the principal sum of $118,218.00 (the amount of the 23 2006 federal income tax refund erroneously issued to defendant Peter Ma), plus 24 statutory interest of $10,588.01 accrued through July 1, 2013, plus interest 25 accruing under 26 U.S.C. § 6602 at the rate set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 6621 after July 26 1, 2013, until the principal sum is paid in full. 27 /// 28 /// 1  1 This order shall constitute the final judgment in this action. Defendant has 2 waived his right to appeal this judgment. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over 3 defendant and this matter for the purpose of enforcement of this judgment. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: July 26, 2013 ____________________________ 8 HON. JOHN F. WALTER United States District Court Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Respectfully submitted, ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney SANDRA R. BROWN Asst. U.S. Attorney Chief, Tax Division DANIEL LAYTON Asst. U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the United States 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?