United States of America v. Peter Ma
Filing
25
Final Judgment Upon Complaint toRecover Erroneous Tax Refund by Judge John F. Walter. Based on the Stipulation for Final JudgmentUpon Complaint to Recover Erroneous Tax Refund 24 and good cause appearingthereon, that judgment is entered in favor o f plaintiff United States of America and against defendant Peter Ma in the principal sum of $118,218.00 plus statutory interest of $10,588.01 accrued through July 1, 2013, plus interest accruing under 26 USC section 6602 at the rate set for th in 26 USC section 6621 after 7/1/2013, until the principal sum is paid in full. This order shall constitute the final judgment in this action. Defendant has waived his right to appeal this judgment. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over defendant and this matter for the purpose of enforcement of this judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
SANDRA R. BROWN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
DANIEL LAYTON (SBN 240763)
Assistant United States Attorney
Room 7211, Federal Building
300 North Los Angeles Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
T: (213) 894-6165 F: (213) 894-0115
Daniel.Layton@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for the United States of America
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
JS-6
PETER MA,
Defendant.
16
17
) Case No. CV12-9559-JFW (FMOx)
) Final Judgment Upon Complaint to
) Recover Erroneous Tax Refund
)
)
)
)
)
18
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based on the Stipulation for Final Judgment
19
20
Upon Complaint to Recover Erroneous Tax Refund, and good cause appearing
21
thereon, that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff United States of America and
22
against defendant Peter Ma in the principal sum of $118,218.00 (the amount of the
23
2006 federal income tax refund erroneously issued to defendant Peter Ma), plus
24
statutory interest of $10,588.01 accrued through July 1, 2013, plus interest
25
accruing under 26 U.S.C. § 6602 at the rate set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 6621 after July
26
1, 2013, until the principal sum is paid in full.
27
///
28
///
1
1
This order shall constitute the final judgment in this action. Defendant has
2
waived his right to appeal this judgment. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over
3
defendant and this matter for the purpose of enforcement of this judgment.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
DATED: July 26, 2013
____________________________
8
HON. JOHN F. WALTER
United States District Court Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Respectfully submitted,
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
SANDRA R. BROWN
Asst. U.S. Attorney
Chief, Tax Division
DANIEL LAYTON
Asst. U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for the United States
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?