Michael Ross v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al

Filing 51

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO RECONSIDER 50 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court carefully and thoroughly considered each partys arguments before ruling on the remand motion, the Court DENIES Rosss Motion for Reconsideration. The Court also notes that Ross misconstrues the Courts previous Order. The Court clarifies that it did not dismiss any claims or parties in its Order denying the remand motion. The entire Second Amended Complaint remains intact. (lc). Modified on 4/18/2013. (lc).

Download PDF
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 MICHAEL ROSS, v. Case No. 2:12-cv-09687-ODW(JCx) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER [50] MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC et al., Defendants. 16 17 The Court has received Plaintiff Michael Ross’s Motion for Reconsideration of 18 the Court’s Order denying Ross’s remand motion. Because the Court carefully and 19 thoroughly considered each party’s arguments before ruling on the remand motion, the 20 Court DENIES Ross’s Motion for Reconsideration. 21 The Court also notes that Ross misconstrues the Court’s previous Order. The 22 Court clarifies that it did not dismiss any claims or parties in its Order denying the 23 remand motion. Ross’s entire Second Amended Complaint remains intact. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 April 17, 2013 26 27 28 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?