Michael Ross v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al
Filing
92
JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, in favor of Michael G Ross against Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, Brian Krueger, Cynthia Newman, Robert L Perry Related to: REQUEST for Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 68 90 IT IS HEREBY ORDERE D AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered pursuant to Rule 68 for Plaintiff and against Defendants in the sum of Thirty-One Thousand Dollars ($31,000.00), which is inclusive of all recoverable attorney's fees and costs.This action is dismissed in its entirety. All dates are VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rfi)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
MICHAEL ROSS,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
Case No. CV 12-09687 BRO (JCx)
JUDGMENT
v.
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH
BARNEY, LLC, a limited liability
corporation; CYNTHIA NEWMAN, an
individual; BRIAN KRUEGER, an
individual; ROBERT L. PERRY, an
individual; and DOES 1-20, inclusive,
Defendants.
Judge:
Beverly Reid O’Connell
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
The Offer of Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 (“Rule
68”) of defendants Cynthia Newman, Robert Perry, and Brian Krueger, and Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney LLC (collectively “Defendants”) was accepted by Plaintiff
Michael Ross (“Plaintiff”) on or about February 27, 2014.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered
pursuant to Rule 68 for Plaintiff and against Defendants in the sum of Thirty-One
Thousand Dollars ($31,000.00), which is inclusive of all recoverable attorney’s fees
and costs.
This action is dismissed in its entirety. All dates are VACATED.
10
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 5, 2014
____________________________________
HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?