Michael Ross v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al

Filing 92

JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, in favor of Michael G Ross against Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, Brian Krueger, Cynthia Newman, Robert L Perry Related to: REQUEST for Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 68 90 IT IS HEREBY ORDERE D AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered pursuant to Rule 68 for Plaintiff and against Defendants in the sum of Thirty-One Thousand Dollars ($31,000.00), which is inclusive of all recoverable attorney's fees and costs.This action is dismissed in its entirety. All dates are VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rfi)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 MICHAEL ROSS, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff, Case No. CV 12-09687 BRO (JCx) JUDGMENT v. MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY, LLC, a limited liability corporation; CYNTHIA NEWMAN, an individual; BRIAN KRUEGER, an individual; ROBERT L. PERRY, an individual; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. Judge: Beverly Reid O’Connell 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 The Offer of Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 (“Rule 68”) of defendants Cynthia Newman, Robert Perry, and Brian Krueger, and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (collectively “Defendants”) was accepted by Plaintiff Michael Ross (“Plaintiff”) on or about February 27, 2014. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered pursuant to Rule 68 for Plaintiff and against Defendants in the sum of Thirty-One Thousand Dollars ($31,000.00), which is inclusive of all recoverable attorney’s fees and costs. This action is dismissed in its entirety. All dates are VACATED. 10 11 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 5, 2014 ____________________________________ HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?