Eduardo Cervantes v. County of Los Angeles et al
Filing
142
FINAL JUDGMENT 11 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this matter with respect to the recovery of allowed costs as set forth in Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedu re. Defendant County of Los Angeles is dismissed from this action with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Eduardo Cervantes as against Defendants Paulo Cruz and Vincent Cisneros; and Plaintiff Eduardo Cervantes shall recover from Defendants Paulo Cruz and Vincent Cisneros $500,000.00 in compensatory damages and $264,304.62 in attorneys' fees and unreimbursed expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
EDUARDO CERVANTES,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
Case No.: CV12-09889 DDP (MRWx)
FINAL JUDGMENT
v.
[CLOSED]
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
Pursuant to Rule 54 and Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by
21
reason of the Court’s prior orders in this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
22
ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this matter with respect to the recovery of
allowed costs as set forth in Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Defendant County of Los Angeles is dismissed from this action with
prejudice.
Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Eduardo Cervantes as against
Defendants Paulo Cruz and Vincent Cisneros; and Plaintiff Eduardo Cervantes
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
-1-
1
shall recover from Defendants Paulo Cruz and Vincent Cisneros $500,000.00 in
2
compensatory damages and $264,304.62 in attorneys’ fees and unreimbursed
3
expenses.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
9
10
Dated: March 16, 2016
THE HONORABLE DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge
Central District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?