LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated
Filing
102
APPLICATION for Order for GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL filed by Plaintiff LegalZoom.com Inc. (Heather, Fred)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PATRICIA L. GLASER - State Bar No. 55668
pglaser@glaserweil.com
FRED D. HEATHER - State Bar No. 110650
fheather@glaserweil.com
GLASER WEIL FINK
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 553-3000
Facsimile: (310) 556-2920
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED,
a Delaware corporation,
16
Defendants.
17
CASE NO.: CV 12-9942-GAF (AGRx)
PLAINTIFF LEGALZOOM.COM,
INC.’S APPLICATION FOR AN
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:
Action Filed:
August 18, 2014
9:30 a.m.
Hon. Gary A. Feess
740
November 20, 2012
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGALZOOM’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
898075.1
1
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORENYS OF RECORDS HEREIN:
2
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in accordance with Local Rule 79-5.1, of
3
the Central District of California, Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. (“LegalZoom”)
4
hereby applies for an order permitting them to file under seal the following:
5
1) Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities (Unredacted) in Support of
6
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Brought by Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc.;
7
and
2) Evidentiary Objections (Unredacted) to Rocket Lawyer’s Opposition to
8
9
LegalZoom’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
This application is made pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 et seq. and the Stipulated
10
11
Protective Order, entered on September 24, 2013 (ECF No. 39).
12
REASONS SUPPORTING RELIEF REQUESTED
13
Good cause exists to seal the Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities
14
15
and Evidentiary Objections. These documents are subject to the Court’s protective
16
order and the sealing of these documents is necessary in order to protect information
17
that one of the parties has designated as “confidential” or “attorneys’ eyes only,”
18
including without limitation, confidential business information and other sensitive
19
business data. See Protective Order, ECF No. 39, at 5-7.
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
2
LEGALZOOM’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
898075.1
CONCLUSION
1
For the foregoing reasons, LegalZoom.com, Inc. respectfully requests that the
2
3
Court order its Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities and Evidentiary
4
Objections to Rocket Lawyer’s Opposition to LegalZoom’s Motion for Partial
5
Summary Judgment be filed under seal.
6
7
DATED: August 4, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
8
9
10
By:
11
12
13
14
/s/ Fred Heather
PATRICIA L. GLASER
FRED D. HEATHER
PATRICIA J. WINOGRAD
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
LEGALZOOM’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
898075.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PROOF OF SERVICE - LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S STATEMENT OF GENUINE ISSUES
898075.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?