LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated

Filing 28

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff LegalZoom.com Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/30/2013 at 09:30 AM before Judge Gary A. Feess. (Attachments: # 1 Separate Statement, # 2 Exhibit A - L, # 3 Proposed Order)(Heather, Fred)

Download PDF
1 PATRICIA L. GLASER -State Bar No. 55668 pglaser glaserweil.com FRED .I -BATHER -State Bar No. 110650 2 fheather laserweil.com T. NGUYEN -State Bar No. 269099 3 MARY mnguyen laserweil.com IL FINK JACOBS 4 GLASER HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP s 10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067 ) 6 Telephone: (310. 553-3000 Facsimile: (310} 556-2920 Attorneys for Plaintiff s LegalZoom.com,Inc. 9 io ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~ ~;F ~ ~, ~ ms's CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ii f?', ~~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIVISION is LEGALZOOM.COM,INC., a Delaware corporation, i3 Plaintiff, is Iv. is ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED, i6 a Delaware corporation, i~ is 19 Defendants. CASE NO.: CV 12-9942-GAF(AGI~) Hon. Gary A. Feess Courtroom: 740 PLAINTIFF LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment submitted under separate cover] Zo 21 as September 30,2013 Date: Time: 9:30 a.m. Courtroom: 740 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 810030 Pursuant to Rule 56 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.1 i a of this Court, Plaintiff LegalZoom.com,Inc.("LegalZoom") hereby submits the 3 following statement of material facts in support of its motion for summary judgment: 4 s 6 ~ 1. _ __. __ MATERIAL FACTS _ EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT UNCONTROVERTED FACT LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer are Rocket Lawyer's Answer to Amended g both providers of online legal products. Complaint and Amended Counterclaims 9 ("Rocket Lawyer's Amended io 11.2, Counterclaims"), ECF No. 17, 12:2-3. Rocket Lawyer's Amended LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer ~a 12 compete with one another in the online Counterclaims, ECF No. 17, 12:2-3. °~ 13 legal products industry. _..... 14 3. LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer Rocket Lawyer's Amended 1s "both offer incorporation and formation Counterclaims, ECF No. 17, 12:2-3. services andv other online legal_...... ~.~ _ _ _.~ ~~.. ~ _._...... - _ _.. _.. _ _ products.__ On its website, Rocket Lawyer 17 ` 4. Declaration of Mary Ann T. Nguyen 18 'touts to provide affordable legal services ("Nguyen Decl."), ¶ 3, Ex. A (Rocket 19 ',° to individuals, families and business Lawyer's "About Us" webpage). u ~ ~,~~`~ o ~~= 16 20 owners. 21 5. Nguyen Decl., ¶ 4,Ex. B (Screen grabs At least in 2011,2012 and 2013, 22 Rocket Lawyer advertised "free" of Rocket Lawyer's Advertisements). 23 ~~ incorporation and "free" limited liability 24 companies(EEGs). 25 6. ;Nguyen Decl., ¶ 4,Ex. B (Screen grabs Rocket Lawyer has advertised 26 "Incorporate for Free... Pay No Fees $0," of Rocket Lawyer's Advertisements). 27 ~~ "Incorporate Your Business at Rocket 28 ~ Lawyer Free,""Form Your LLC Free at a LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 810030 1 I UNCONTROVERTED FACT EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT 2 ~ Rocket Lawyer" and "Free... LLCs." 3 ~ 7. Rocket Lawyer's customers are Nguyen Decl., ¶¶ 2, 5, Ex. C(Screen 4 `;: required to pay the state fees associated grabs of state filing options through 5 'with incorporation and formation. Rocket Lawyer's services); Declaration 6 of Mary Ann T. Nguyen("Nguyen Decl.") g 18. Customers who access the Rocket Nguyen Decl., ¶ 6,Ex. D (Screen grabs 9 Lawyer link to the "Incorporate for of Rocket Lawyer's "Interview" for ~o Free... Pay No Fees $0,""Incorporate "Company Set-Up" and "Company 11 your Business at Rocket Lawyer Free," Details") 12 "Form Your LLC Free at Rocket Lawyer" 13 ~ or "Free... LLCs" do not discover that 14 they must actually pay the state filing fees is ;until after they have accessed the Rocket 16 Lawyer website, completed a "company 17 setup" and filled out information relating 18 to the "company details." 19 : 9, Rocket Lawyer subsequently Rocket Lawyer's Answer and Amended 20 changed the language ofthese Counterclaims, ECF No. 17, 2:26-3:1 21 advertisements after LegalZoom filed its ("Rocket Lawyer admits that it has 22 original Complaint. produced new advertisements regarding 23 ' its business and a variety of services it 24 offers since the service ofthe original Zs complaint...."). 26 i 10. At least in 2012, Rocket Lawyer 27 advertised "Free help from local Nguyen Decl., ¶ 7, Ex. E(Screen grabs of Rocket Lawyer's Advertisements). 28 ~ attorneys" and "Free legal review." __. 3 LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 810030 EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT UNCONTROVERTED FACT lall 2 11. Nguyen Decl., ¶ 8,Ex. F(Rocket Rocket Lawyer's customers could 3 access "help from local attorneys" or Lawyer's On Call Terms of Service, 4 , "legal review" for free only if they were dated July 2012, as printed on November s "Eligible Members" who had either(a) 27, 2012). 6 ' purchased three consecutive months of ~ Rocket Lawyer's monthly Legal Plan, or g (b) purchased a Rocket Lawyer annual 9 Legal Plan. io 12. Nguyen Decl., ¶ 9,see The paid-membership requirement ii for access to the purported "free help ~, .~~ 12 13 .' review" was not disclosed in close 14 terms-of -service.rl. from local attorneys" and "free legal ~' --,~ in ~: ~ http://www.rocketlawyer.com/on-call- proximity to the advertisements on o ~; ~~. _~ ,~ -~ is Rocket Lawyer's website. _ ___ 16 a~`i = 13. _ __ The paid-membership requirement Nguyen Decl., ¶ 9,see i~ was only disclosed in Rocket Lawyer's http://www.rocketlawyer.com/on-call- is ~"On Call Terms of Service," which was I terms-of -service.rl. i9 accessible to customers on a separate link ao found at ai http://www.rocketlawyer.com/on-calla2 terms-of -service.rl. Rocket Lawyer subsequently 23 14. 24 ` changed the language of its "On Call Zs Terms of Service" to provide that 26 "Customers who enter into a one week 2~ Lawyer's On Call Terms of Service, dated November 2012, as printed on November 29, 2012). (seven(7)calendar days)free trial are 28 Nguyen Decl., ¶ 10, Ex. G(Rocket eligible to receive one(1)free legal 4 LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 810030 EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT UNCONTROVERTED FACT _ __ 2 : matter consultation..." after LegalZoom 1 3 'filed its original Complaint. 4 15. Nguyen Decl., ¶ 10, Exs. F and G The access to "free help from local 5 attorneys" and "free legal review" during (Rocket Lawyer's On Call Terms of 6 a "free trial" was not available before Service, dated July 2012, as printed on ~ LegalZoom's filing ofthe original November 27, 2012; Rocket Lawyer's g Complaint. On Call Terms of Service, dated E November 2012, as printed on November io 29, 2012). 11 16. Nguyen Decl., ¶ 11, Ex. G(Rocket Access to the advertised "free help 12 from local attorneys" and the "free legal Lawyer's On Call Terms of Service, 13 review" was still conditioned upon dated November 2012, as printed on 14 ;customers actively enrolling in Rocket November 29, 2012). is Lawyer's trial membership and providing 16 ' Rocket Lawyer with their credit card 17 'information. 18 ~ 17. At least in 2012 and 2013, Rocket ' Nguyen Decl., ¶ 12, Ex. H(Rocket 19 Lawyer advertised on its website "free" Lawyer "Try It Free" Advertisement). 20 trials of its "Basic Legal Plan" and "Pro ~i ~ Legal Plan." 22 18. Nguyen Decl., ¶ 13, Ex. I(Rocket Customers who sign up fora one- 23 week free trial membership under the Lawyer's "Free" Trial Enrollment Page). 24 , "Basic Legal Plan" or "Pro Legal Plan" 25 must first provide Rocket Lawyer with 26 `their credit card information and enroll in 27 Rocket Lawyer's "negative option" 28 program — i.e., a program in which s LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 810030 UNCONTROVERTED FACT _ __ _ 2 '. customers are automatically enrolled and 1 _ EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT _ 3 ,billed and must contact Rocket Lawyer to 4 opt out of. 5 19. A disclosure of Rocket Lawyer's 6 negative option is found in standard font r __ _ ; Nguyen Decl., ¶ 13, Ex. I(Rocket Lawyer's "Free" Trial Enrollment Page). ~ only upon the customer being directed to g ~ enroll in the "free trial," and no further 9 'acknowledgement regarding the negative to ,option is provided. ~. ~~~ 11 , 20. No further acknowledgement i~ regarding the negative option (other than ~~ 13 ; 14 21. __ Lawyer's "Free" Trial Enrollment Page). as described in 19)is provided. ~~ ~ ~ _ ,Nguyen Decl., ¶ 13, Ex. I(Rocket ~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~ On October 13, 2011,LegalZoom's NguYen Decl., 1f 14, Ex. J CE-mail is Chairman, Brian Liu, contacted Rocket 16 : Lawyer's CEO,Dan Nye, stating that Exchange Between Brian Liu and Dan ; Nye, dated October 13, 2013). `~ o ~'= 17 there were "important issues that 1 g [LegalZoom's] legal department has 19 brought up regarding [Rocket Lawyer's] 20 advertising." 21 22. Dan Nye responded by stating that 1 Nguyen Decl., ¶ 14, Ex. J (E-mail ~~ Liu should discuss this issue with Charley ~ Exchange Between Brian Liu and Dan 23 Moore,Rocket Lawyer's founder and Nye, dated October 13, 2013). 24 Chairman, and copied Moore on the email 2s I exchange 26 23. On October 14, Brian Liu had a 27 telephone conversation with Charley ;Nguyen Decl., ¶ 15, Ex. K(E-Mail from Brian Liu to Charley Moore, dated 28 . Moore, stating that LegalZoom took issue :October 14, 2011). 6 LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 810030 UNCONTROVERTED FACT 1 l EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT 2 with Rocket Lawyer's ads, which 3 'promised "Set up a Free LLC... Totally 4 Free," and "100% Free," since state filing s fees must always be paid when setting up 6 ' an LLC through Rocket Lawyer. ~ 24. Brian Liu also asked Charley g 1 Moore to read and follow the Federal Nguyen Decl., ¶ 15, Ex. K(E-Mail from Brian Liu to Charley Moore, dated 9 Trade Commission's guidelines regarding October 14, 2011). to the use ofthe word "free" in advertising, 11 which requires, among other things, that 12 "all terms, conditions and obligations 13 'upon which receipt and retention ofthe ',~_ .~ ',~ vl~ ~, ~ 14 "Free" item are contingent should be set is forth clearly and conspicuously at the 16 outset ofthe offer so as to leave no `~ o ~'= 17 reasonable probability that the terms of 18 the offer might be misunderstood." 19 25. Brian Liu requested that Rocket Nguyen Decl., ¶ 15, Ex. K(E-Mail from 20 Lawyer immediately take down these and Brian Liu to Charley Moore, dated 21 other misleading advertisements. October 14, 2011). 22 ' 26. Nguyen Decl., ¶ 16, Ex. L(Liu's In November 2011, Rocket 23 Lawyer's advertising regarding "free" November E-mails to Rocket Lawyer). 24 . trials and services still had not been 25 j~ changed or removed. 26 .27. Beginning November 15, 2011, in a Nguyen Decl., ¶ 16, Ex. L (Liu's 27 series of emails, Brian Liu repeatedly 'November E-mails to Rocket Lawyer). 28 ;requested that Rocket Lawyer discontinue LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 810030 1 UNCONTROVERTED FACT __ __ EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT 2 ;its false advertising and unfair 3 competition practices. 4 5 6 DATED: August 23, 2013 Respectfully submitted, r~ GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP s 9 io ii 12 i7 Q~'n. c~'s ~~ ~'~, ~' c i~,.' ar _' v By: /s/ Fred Heather PATRICIA L. GLASER FRED D. HEATHER MARY ANN T. NGUYEN Attorneys for Plaintiff LegalZoom.com,Inc. 13 14 15 f~ a~ `~ ' 4 ~"~_ 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS 810030 i PROOF OF SERVICE a STATE OF CALIFORNIA,COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California; I am over the 4 age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 10250 5 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067. 6 On August 23, 2013,I electronically filed the following documents) using the CM/ECF system. s PLAINTIFF LEGALZOOM.COM,INC.'S SEPARATE STATEMENT 9 OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION io FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ii Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the ~,~ ~ i2 o,. ~'' a' ti~ 13 ~~ '~ CM/ECF system. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member ofthe bar of this court at is is whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. a~ 16 Executed on August 23, 2013 at Los Angeles, California. t~ z 1~ 18 19 /s/ Fred Heather Fred Heather 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 810030

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?