LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated
Filing
28
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff LegalZoom.com Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/30/2013 at 09:30 AM before Judge Gary A. Feess. (Attachments: # 1 Separate Statement, # 2 Exhibit A - L, # 3 Proposed Order)(Heather, Fred)
1 PATRICIA L. GLASER -State Bar No. 55668
pglaser glaserweil.com
FRED .I
-BATHER -State Bar No. 110650
2
fheather laserweil.com
T. NGUYEN -State Bar No. 269099
3 MARY
mnguyen laserweil.com
IL FINK JACOBS
4 GLASER
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
s 10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
)
6 Telephone: (310. 553-3000
Facsimile: (310} 556-2920
Attorneys for Plaintiff
s LegalZoom.com,Inc.
9
io
~~
~~
~~
,~
~;F ~
~, ~
ms's
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ii
f?', ~~
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DIVISION
is LEGALZOOM.COM,INC., a Delaware
corporation,
i3
Plaintiff,
is
Iv.
is
ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED,
i6 a Delaware corporation,
i~
is
19
Defendants.
CASE NO.: CV 12-9942-GAF(AGI~)
Hon. Gary A. Feess
Courtroom: 740
PLAINTIFF LEGALZOOM.COM,
INC.'S SEPARATE STATEMENT
OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL
FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
[Notice of Motion and Motion for
Summary Judgment submitted
under separate cover]
Zo
21
as
September 30,2013
Date:
Time:
9:30 a.m.
Courtroom: 740
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
810030
Pursuant to Rule 56 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.1
i
a of this Court, Plaintiff LegalZoom.com,Inc.("LegalZoom") hereby submits the
3
following statement of material facts in support of its motion for summary judgment:
4
s
6
~ 1.
_
__.
__ MATERIAL FACTS
_
EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT
UNCONTROVERTED FACT
LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer are Rocket Lawyer's Answer to Amended
g both providers of online legal products.
Complaint and Amended Counterclaims
9
("Rocket Lawyer's Amended
io
11.2,
Counterclaims"), ECF No. 17, 12:2-3.
Rocket Lawyer's Amended
LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer
~a
12 compete with one another in the online
Counterclaims, ECF No. 17, 12:2-3.
°~
13 legal products industry.
_.....
14 3.
LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer
Rocket Lawyer's Amended
1s "both offer incorporation and formation
Counterclaims, ECF No. 17, 12:2-3.
services andv other online legal_......
~.~ _ _ _.~ ~~.. ~ _._...... - _ _.. _.. _ _ products.__
On its website, Rocket Lawyer
17 ` 4.
Declaration of Mary Ann T. Nguyen
18 'touts to provide affordable legal services
("Nguyen Decl."), ¶ 3, Ex. A (Rocket
19 ',° to individuals, families and business
Lawyer's "About Us" webpage).
u ~
~,~~`~
o
~~=
16
20 owners.
21 5.
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 4,Ex. B (Screen grabs
At least in 2011,2012 and 2013,
22 Rocket Lawyer advertised "free"
of Rocket Lawyer's Advertisements).
23 ~~ incorporation and "free" limited liability
24 companies(EEGs).
25 6.
;Nguyen Decl., ¶ 4,Ex. B (Screen grabs
Rocket Lawyer has advertised
26 "Incorporate for Free... Pay No Fees $0," of Rocket Lawyer's Advertisements).
27 ~~ "Incorporate Your Business at Rocket
28 ~ Lawyer Free,""Form Your LLC Free at
a
LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
810030
1 I
UNCONTROVERTED FACT
EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT
2 ~ Rocket Lawyer" and "Free... LLCs."
3 ~ 7.
Rocket Lawyer's customers are
Nguyen Decl., ¶¶ 2, 5, Ex. C(Screen
4 `;: required to pay the state fees associated
grabs of state filing options through
5 'with incorporation and formation.
Rocket Lawyer's services); Declaration
6
of Mary Ann T. Nguyen("Nguyen
Decl.")
g 18.
Customers who access the Rocket
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 6,Ex. D (Screen grabs
9 Lawyer link to the "Incorporate for
of Rocket Lawyer's "Interview" for
~o Free... Pay No Fees $0,""Incorporate
"Company Set-Up" and "Company
11 your Business at Rocket Lawyer Free,"
Details")
12 "Form Your LLC Free at Rocket Lawyer"
13 ~ or "Free... LLCs" do not discover that
14 they must actually pay the state filing fees
is ;until after they have accessed the Rocket
16 Lawyer website, completed a "company
17 setup" and filled out information relating
18 to the "company details."
19 : 9,
Rocket Lawyer subsequently
Rocket Lawyer's Answer and Amended
20 changed the language ofthese
Counterclaims, ECF No. 17, 2:26-3:1
21 advertisements after LegalZoom filed its
("Rocket Lawyer admits that it has
22 original Complaint.
produced new advertisements regarding
23 '
its business and a variety of services it
24
offers since the service ofthe original
Zs
complaint....").
26 i 10.
At least in 2012, Rocket Lawyer
27 advertised "Free help from local
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 7, Ex. E(Screen grabs of
Rocket Lawyer's Advertisements).
28 ~ attorneys" and "Free legal review."
__.
3
LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
810030
EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT
UNCONTROVERTED FACT
lall
2 11.
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 8,Ex. F(Rocket
Rocket Lawyer's customers could
3 access "help from local attorneys" or
Lawyer's On Call Terms of Service,
4 , "legal review" for free only if they were
dated July 2012, as printed on November
s "Eligible Members" who had either(a)
27, 2012).
6 ' purchased three consecutive months of
~ Rocket Lawyer's monthly Legal Plan, or
g (b) purchased a Rocket Lawyer annual
9 Legal Plan.
io 12.
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 9,see
The paid-membership requirement
ii for access to the purported "free help
~,
.~~
12
13 .'
review" was not disclosed in close
14
terms-of -service.rl.
from local attorneys" and "free legal
~'
--,~
in
~:
~
http://www.rocketlawyer.com/on-call-
proximity to the advertisements on
o ~; ~~.
_~
,~
-~
is Rocket Lawyer's website.
_
___
16
a~`i
=
13.
_
__
The paid-membership requirement Nguyen Decl., ¶ 9,see
i~ was only disclosed in Rocket Lawyer's
http://www.rocketlawyer.com/on-call-
is ~"On Call Terms of Service," which was
I
terms-of -service.rl.
i9 accessible to customers on a separate link
ao found at
ai http://www.rocketlawyer.com/on-calla2 terms-of -service.rl.
Rocket Lawyer subsequently
23
14.
24 `
changed the language of its "On Call
Zs Terms of Service" to provide that
26
"Customers who enter into a one week
2~
Lawyer's On Call Terms of Service,
dated November 2012, as printed on
November 29, 2012).
(seven(7)calendar days)free trial are
28
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 10, Ex. G(Rocket
eligible to receive one(1)free legal
4
LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
810030
EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT
UNCONTROVERTED FACT _
__
2 : matter consultation..." after LegalZoom
1
3 'filed its original Complaint.
4 15.
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 10, Exs. F and G
The access to "free help from local
5 attorneys" and "free legal review" during
(Rocket Lawyer's On Call Terms of
6 a "free trial" was not available before
Service, dated July 2012, as printed on
~ LegalZoom's filing ofthe original
November 27, 2012; Rocket Lawyer's
g Complaint.
On Call Terms of Service, dated
E
November 2012, as printed on November
io
29, 2012).
11 16.
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 11, Ex. G(Rocket
Access to the advertised "free help
12 from local attorneys" and the "free legal
Lawyer's On Call Terms of Service,
13 review" was still conditioned upon
dated November 2012, as printed on
14 ;customers actively enrolling in Rocket
November 29, 2012).
is Lawyer's trial membership and providing
16 ' Rocket Lawyer with their credit card
17 'information.
18 ~ 17.
At least in 2012 and 2013, Rocket ' Nguyen Decl., ¶ 12, Ex. H(Rocket
19 Lawyer advertised on its website "free"
Lawyer "Try It Free" Advertisement).
20 trials of its "Basic Legal Plan" and "Pro
~i ~ Legal Plan."
22 18.
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 13, Ex. I(Rocket
Customers who sign up fora one-
23 week free trial membership under the
Lawyer's "Free" Trial Enrollment Page).
24 , "Basic Legal Plan" or "Pro Legal Plan"
25 must first provide Rocket Lawyer with
26 `their credit card information and enroll in
27 Rocket Lawyer's "negative option"
28 program — i.e., a program in which
s
LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
810030
UNCONTROVERTED FACT
_
__
_
2 '. customers are automatically enrolled and
1
_
EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT
_
3 ,billed and must contact Rocket Lawyer to
4 opt out of.
5 19.
A disclosure of Rocket Lawyer's
6 negative option is found in standard font
r
__
_
; Nguyen Decl., ¶ 13, Ex. I(Rocket
Lawyer's "Free" Trial Enrollment Page).
~ only upon the customer being directed to
g ~ enroll in the "free trial," and no further
9 'acknowledgement regarding the negative
to ,option is provided.
~.
~~~
11 , 20.
No further acknowledgement
i~ regarding the negative option (other than
~~
13 ;
14
21.
__
Lawyer's "Free" Trial Enrollment Page).
as described in 19)is provided.
~~ ~
~
_
,Nguyen Decl., ¶ 13, Ex. I(Rocket
~ ~
,~
~~ ~
On October 13, 2011,LegalZoom's NguYen Decl., 1f 14, Ex. J CE-mail
is Chairman, Brian Liu, contacted Rocket
16 : Lawyer's CEO,Dan Nye, stating that
Exchange Between Brian Liu and Dan
; Nye, dated October 13, 2013).
`~ o
~'=
17 there were "important issues that
1 g [LegalZoom's] legal department has
19 brought up regarding [Rocket Lawyer's]
20 advertising."
21 22.
Dan Nye responded by stating that 1 Nguyen Decl., ¶ 14, Ex. J (E-mail
~~ Liu should discuss this issue with Charley ~ Exchange Between Brian Liu and Dan
23 Moore,Rocket Lawyer's founder and
Nye, dated October 13, 2013).
24 Chairman, and copied Moore on the email
2s I exchange
26 23.
On October 14, Brian Liu had a
27 telephone conversation with Charley
;Nguyen Decl., ¶ 15, Ex. K(E-Mail from
Brian Liu to Charley Moore, dated
28 . Moore, stating that LegalZoom took issue :October 14, 2011).
6
LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
810030
UNCONTROVERTED FACT
1 l
EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT
2 with Rocket Lawyer's ads, which
3 'promised "Set up a Free LLC... Totally
4 Free," and "100% Free," since state filing
s fees must always be paid when setting up
6 ' an LLC through Rocket Lawyer.
~ 24.
Brian Liu also asked Charley
g 1 Moore to read and follow the Federal
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 15, Ex. K(E-Mail from
Brian Liu to Charley Moore, dated
9 Trade Commission's guidelines regarding October 14, 2011).
to the use ofthe word "free" in advertising,
11 which requires, among other things, that
12 "all terms, conditions and obligations
13 'upon which receipt and retention ofthe
',~_ .~
',~
vl~
~, ~
14 "Free" item are contingent should be set
is forth clearly and conspicuously at the
16
outset ofthe offer so as to leave no
`~ o
~'=
17 reasonable probability that the terms of
18 the offer might be misunderstood."
19 25.
Brian Liu requested that Rocket
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 15, Ex. K(E-Mail from
20 Lawyer immediately take down these and
Brian Liu to Charley Moore, dated
21 other misleading advertisements.
October 14, 2011).
22 ' 26.
Nguyen Decl., ¶ 16, Ex. L(Liu's
In November 2011, Rocket
23 Lawyer's advertising regarding "free"
November E-mails to Rocket Lawyer).
24 . trials and services still had not been
25 j~ changed or removed.
26 .27.
Beginning November 15, 2011, in a Nguyen Decl., ¶ 16, Ex. L (Liu's
27 series of emails, Brian Liu repeatedly
'November E-mails to Rocket Lawyer).
28 ;requested that Rocket Lawyer discontinue
LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
810030
1
UNCONTROVERTED FACT
__
__
EVIDENTIARY SUPPORT
2 ;its false advertising and unfair
3 competition practices.
4
5
6 DATED: August 23, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
r~
GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
s
9
io
ii
12
i7
Q~'n.
c~'s
~~
~'~,
~' c
i~,.' ar
_' v
By:
/s/ Fred Heather
PATRICIA L. GLASER
FRED D. HEATHER
MARY ANN T. NGUYEN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LegalZoom.com,Inc.
13
14
15
f~
a~
`~ ' 4
~"~_
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
LEGALZOOM'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
810030
i
PROOF OF SERVICE
a
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
3
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California; I am over the
4
age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 10250
5
Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067.
6
On August 23, 2013,I electronically filed the following documents) using the
CM/ECF system.
s
PLAINTIFF LEGALZOOM.COM,INC.'S SEPARATE STATEMENT
9
OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION
io
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ii
Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the
~,~ ~
i2
o,.
~'' a'
ti~
13
~~
'~
CM/ECF system.
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member ofthe bar of this court at
is
is
whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury that the
above is true and correct.
a~
16
Executed on August 23, 2013 at Los Angeles, California.
t~ z
1~
18
19
/s/ Fred Heather
Fred Heather
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
810030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?