LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated
Filing
40
DISCLOSURE LEGALZOOM.COM Inc's Amended Rule 26(A)(1) Disclosures filed by Plaintiff LegalZoom.com Inc, Counter Defendant LegalZoom.com Inc (Heather, Fred)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PATRICIA L. GLASER - State Bar No. 55668
pglaser@glaserweil.com
FRED D. HEATHER - State Bar No. 110650
fheather@glaserweil.com
MARY ANN T. NGUYEN – State Bar No. 269099
mnguyen@glaserweil.com
GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 553-3000
Facsimile: (310) 556-2920
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
WESTERN DIVISION
13
14
15
18
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S
AMENDED RULE 26(A)(1)
DISCLOSURES
Plaintiff,
16
17
Case No. 2:12-cv-09942-GAF-AGR
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
v.
Judge:
Courtroom:
ROCKET LAWYER
INCORPORATED, a Delaware
corporation,
19
Defendant.
Judge Gary A. Feess
740
255 East Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Action Filed: November 20, 2012
20
21
Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff
22
23
24
25
26
LegalZoom.com, Inc. (“LegalZoom” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned
counsel, hereby submits the following amended disclosures (“Amended
Disclosures”).
I.
These Amended Disclosures represent the product of LegalZoom’s
27
28
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT
investigation to date. Further investigation and discovery may bring light to
1
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S AMENDED RULE 26(A)(1) DISCLOSURES
827481.1
1
additional information that may have a bearing on LegalZoom’s claims and defenses
2
in this matter. LegalZoom reserves the right to supplement or amend its Initial
3
Disclosures and these Amended Disclosures as additional information becomes
4
available to LegalZoom upon further investigation and discovery. LegalZoom’s
5
disclosures are made without waiving, in any respect, the right to object the use of
6
any such information, for any purpose, in whole or in part, in any subsequent state
7
or proceeding in this action or any other action, or any other discovery proceeding
8
involving or relating to the subject matter of these disclosures, on the grounds of
9
competency, privilege, relevance, materiality, hearsay, or any other proper ground
10
provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Civil Rules of the
11
United States District Court for the Central District of California.
The following Amended Disclosures are made based on the information
12
13
reasonably available to LegalZoom as of the date of these disclosures and represent
14
LegalZoom’s good faith effort to identify information pertaining to the allegations
15
in this litigation. LegalZoom anticipates that further investigation, research and
16
analysis will supply additional facts and documents and add meaning to known
17
facts, all of which may in turn lead to substantial additions or changes to these
18
disclosures.
All of the disclosures set forth below are made subject to the above comments
19
20
and qualifications.
21
II.
INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE
22
INFORMATION (RULE 26(a)(1)(A)(i))
23
LegalZoom amends its Initial Disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A) as
24
follows:
Based upon information reasonably available to LegalZoom at this time,
25
26
LegalZoom hereby identifies the following individuals who are likely to have
27
discoverable information that LegalZoom may use to support its claims or defenses
28
in this action, excluding individuals who are to be used solely for the purposes of
2
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S AMENDED RULE 26(A)(1) DISCLOSURES
827481.1
1
impeachment.
2
A.
3
The following current chairman of the board and employees of
LegalZoom:
1.
4
Brian Liu, Chairman and Co-Founder of LegalZoom.com, Inc.;
5
c/o Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP,
6
10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor, Los Angeles,
7
California 90067, (310) 553-3000.
2.
8
Dorian Quispe, Vice President, Acquisitions of LegalZoom.com,
Inc.; c/o Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard Avchen & Shapiro
9
10
LLP, 10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor, Los Angeles,
11
California 90067, (310) 553-3000.
3.
12
Edward Hartman, Chief Strategy Officer & President, Attorney
13
Services and Co-Founder of LegalZoom.com, Inc.; c/o Glaser
14
Weil Fink Jacobs Howard Avchen & Shapiro LLP, 10250
15
Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor, Los Angeles, California
16
90067, (310) 553-3000.
4.
17
Scott MacDonell, Vice President of Marketing for
18
LegalZoom.com, Inc.; c/o Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard
19
Avchen & Shapiro LLP, 10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th
20
Floor, Los Angeles, Calfiornia 90067, (310) 553-3000.
5.
21
Matthew Withers, Director Affiliate Marketing for
22
LegalZoom.com, Inc.; c/o Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard
23
Avchen & Shapiro LLP, 10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th
24
Floor, Los Angeles, California 90067, (310) 553-3000.
These individuals are the current chairman of the board or employees of
25
26
LegalZoom and should not be contacted except through counsel for LegalZoom:
27
Patricia L. Glaser and Fred D. Heather, Glaser Weil Fink Jacobs Howard Avchen &
28
Shapiro LLP, 10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor, Los Angeles, California
3
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S AMENDED RULE 26(A)(1) DISCLOSURES
827481.1
1
90067, (310) 552-3000. The aforementioned individuals are knowledgeable and are
2
expected to have information regarding LegalZoom’s marketing, advertisements and
3
promotions as well as LegalZoom’s business operations.
4
5
Dated: September 26, 2013
6
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Fred D. Heather
Patricia L. Glaser
pglaser@glaserweil.com
Fred D. Heather
fheather@glaserweil.com
Mary Ann T. Nguyen
mnguyen@glaserweil.com
GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN &
SHAPIRO LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard,
19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Tel.: (310) 553-3000
Fax.: (310) 556-2920
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S AMENDED RULE 26(A)(1) DISCLOSURES
827481.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?