LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated

Filing 77

APPLICATION for Order Granting Leave to File Documents Under Seal filed by plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. will and hereby does apply for an order permitting them to file under seal the following: 1) Unredacted Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. s Statement of Genuine Disputes in Opposition to Rocket Lawyerss Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication; 2) Unredacted Declaration of Patricia Winograd in Support of LegalZoom.com, Inc.s Opposition to Rocket Lawyer Incorporateds Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication filed by Plaintiff LegalZoom.com Inc. (Heather, Fred)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PATRICIA L. GLASER - State Bar No. 55668 pglaser@glaserweil.com FRED D. HEATHER - State Bar No. 110650 fheather@glaserweil.com GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP 10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 553-3000 Facsimile: (310) 556-2920 Attorneys for Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, 16 Defendants. 17 CASE NO.: CV 12-9942-GAF (AGRx) PLAINTIFF LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Date: Time: Judge: Courtroom: Action Filed: August 18, 2014 9:30 a.m. Hon. Gary A. Feess 740 November 20, 2012 [Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Statement of Genuine Disputes; Declaration of Patricia J. Winograd, Declaration of Alan Goedde, Declaration Dr. Bruce Isaacson and Notice of Lodging] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LEGALZOOM’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 898075.1 1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORENYS OF RECORDS HEREIN: 2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in accordance with Local Rule 79-5.1, of 3 the Central District of California, Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. (“LegalZoom”) 4 hereby applies for an order permitting them to file under seal the following: 1) Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc.’s Statement of Genuine Disputes 5 6 (Unredacted) in Opposition to Rocket Lawyer Incorporated’s Motion for Summary 7 Judgment and/or Adjudication; and 2) Declaration of Patricia J. Winograd (Unredacted) in Support of 8 9 10 LegalZoom.com, Inc.’s Opposition to Rocket Lawyer Incorporated’s Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication. 11 This application is made pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 et seq. and the Stipulated 12 Protective Order, entered on September 24, 2013 (ECF No. 39), and is based on those 13 reasons, the Statement of Genuine Disputes and the Declaration of Patricia J. 14 Winograd. REASONS SUPPORTING RELIEF REQUESTED 15 16 Good cause exists to seal the Statement of Genuine Disputes and the 17 Declaration of Patricia J. Winograd. These documents are subject to the Court’s 18 protective order and the sealing of these documents is necessary in order to protect 19 information that Rocket Lawyer has designated as “confidential” or “attorneys’ eyes 20 only,” including without limitation, confidential business information and other 21 sensitive business data relating to Rocket Lawyer Incorporated. See Protective Order, 22 ECF No. 39, at 5-7. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 2 LEGALZOOM’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 898075.1 CONCLUSION 1 For the foregoing reasons, LegalZoom.com, Inc. respectfully requests that the 2 3 Court order its Statement of Genuine Disputes and the Declaration of Patricia J. 4 Winograd be filed under seal. 5 6 DATED: July 24, 2014 Respectfully submitted, GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP 7 8 9 By: 10 11 12 13 /s/ Fred Heather PATRICIA L. GLASER FRED D. HEATHER PATRICIA J. WINOGRAD Attorneys for Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 LEGALZOOM’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 898075.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?