LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated
Filing
77
APPLICATION for Order Granting Leave to File Documents Under Seal filed by plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. will and hereby does apply for an order permitting them to file under seal the following: 1) Unredacted Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. s Statement of Genuine Disputes in Opposition to Rocket Lawyerss Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication; 2) Unredacted Declaration of Patricia Winograd in Support of LegalZoom.com, Inc.s Opposition to Rocket Lawyer Incorporateds Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication filed by Plaintiff LegalZoom.com Inc. (Heather, Fred)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PATRICIA L. GLASER - State Bar No. 55668
pglaser@glaserweil.com
FRED D. HEATHER - State Bar No. 110650
fheather@glaserweil.com
GLASER WEIL FINK
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
10250 Constellation Boulevard, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 553-3000
Facsimile: (310) 556-2920
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED,
a Delaware corporation,
16
Defendants.
17
CASE NO.: CV 12-9942-GAF (AGRx)
PLAINTIFF LEGALZOOM.COM,
INC.’S APPLICATION FOR AN
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:
Action Filed:
August 18, 2014
9:30 a.m.
Hon. Gary A. Feess
740
November 20, 2012
[Memorandum of Points and
Authorities; Statement of Genuine
Disputes; Declaration of Patricia J.
Winograd, Declaration of Alan Goedde,
Declaration Dr. Bruce Isaacson and
Notice of Lodging]
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGALZOOM’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
898075.1
1
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORENYS OF RECORDS HEREIN:
2
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in accordance with Local Rule 79-5.1, of
3
the Central District of California, Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc. (“LegalZoom”)
4
hereby applies for an order permitting them to file under seal the following:
1) Plaintiff LegalZoom.com, Inc.’s Statement of Genuine Disputes
5
6
(Unredacted) in Opposition to Rocket Lawyer Incorporated’s Motion for Summary
7
Judgment and/or Adjudication; and
2) Declaration of Patricia J. Winograd (Unredacted) in Support of
8
9
10
LegalZoom.com, Inc.’s Opposition to Rocket Lawyer Incorporated’s Motion for
Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication.
11
This application is made pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 et seq. and the Stipulated
12
Protective Order, entered on September 24, 2013 (ECF No. 39), and is based on those
13
reasons, the Statement of Genuine Disputes and the Declaration of Patricia J.
14
Winograd.
REASONS SUPPORTING RELIEF REQUESTED
15
16
Good cause exists to seal the Statement of Genuine Disputes and the
17
Declaration of Patricia J. Winograd. These documents are subject to the Court’s
18
protective order and the sealing of these documents is necessary in order to protect
19
information that Rocket Lawyer has designated as “confidential” or “attorneys’ eyes
20
only,” including without limitation, confidential business information and other
21
sensitive business data relating to Rocket Lawyer Incorporated. See Protective Order,
22
ECF No. 39, at 5-7.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
2
LEGALZOOM’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
898075.1
CONCLUSION
1
For the foregoing reasons, LegalZoom.com, Inc. respectfully requests that the
2
3
Court order its Statement of Genuine Disputes and the Declaration of Patricia J.
4
Winograd be filed under seal.
5
6
DATED: July 24, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
GLASER WEIL FINK JACOBS
HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP
7
8
9
By:
10
11
12
13
/s/ Fred Heather
PATRICIA L. GLASER
FRED D. HEATHER
PATRICIA J. WINOGRAD
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
LEGALZOOM’S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
898075.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?