LegalZoom.com Inc v. Rocket Lawyer Incorporated
Filing
98
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff LegalZoom.com Inc of 1) APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; 2) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; 3) UNREDACTED REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT BROUGHT BY PLAINTIFF LEGALZOOM.COM, INC; AND 4) UNREDACTED EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO ROCKET LAWYER'S OPPOSITION TO LEGALZOOM'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (Heather, Fred)
Fred D. Heather - SBN 110650
fheather@glaserweil.com
GLASER WEIL FINK HOWARD AVCHEN & SHAPIRO
10250 Constellation Blvd, 19th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
310-553-3000
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.
CASE NUMBER:
v.
ROCKET LAWYER, INCORPORATED
PLAINTIFF(S)
CV 12-9942-GAF (AGRx)
NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING
OR LODGING
DEFENDANT(S).
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.2, the following document(s) or item(s) are exempt from electronic filing,
and will therefore be manually
Filed ✔ Lodged : (List Documents)
1) APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
2) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
3) LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.'S UNREDACTED REPLY TO ROCKET LAWYER INCORPORATED'S
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
4) LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.'S UNREDACTED EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO ROCKET LAWYER'S
OPPOSITION TO LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Reason:
✔
Under Seal and/or In Camera
Items not conducive to e-filing (i.e., videotapes, CDROM, large graphic charts)
Electronic versions are not available to filer
September 24, 2013
Per Court order dated:
Administrative Record
Other:
August 4, 2014
Date
/s/ Fred D.Heather
Attorney Name
LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.
Party Represented
Note: File one Notice of Manual Filing or Lodging in each case, each time you manually submit a document(s).
G-92 (04/14)
NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING OR LODGING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?