Debra Goff v. G2 Secure Staff LLC et al

Filing 24

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 23 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Each party shall bear her or its own costs and attorneys' fees. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Vince M. Verde CA Bar No. 202472 vince.verde@ogletreedeakins.com Carolyn E. Sieve CA Bar No. 182763 carolyn.sieve@ogletreedeakins.com Lara C. de Leon CA Bar No. 270252 lara.deleon@ogletreedeakins.com JS-6 Kelley A. Bolar CA Bar No. 275646 kelley.bolar@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Park Tower, Suite 1500 695 Town Center Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone: 714.800.7905 Facsimile: 714.754.1298 Attorneys for Defendant G2 SECURE STAFF, L.L.C. 10 Bruce Kokozian CA Bar No. 195723 KOKOZIAN LAW FIRM, APC 11 8383 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1018 12 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Telephone: 323.857.5900 13 Facsimile: 323.935.4919 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff DEBRA GOFF, an individual 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 DEBRA GOFF, an individual, Case No. CV12-10008 CAS (VBKx) Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF v. DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH 21 G2 SECURE STAFF, L.L.C.; and DOES PREJUDICE 1 through 100, Inclusive, 22 Action Filed: September 27, 2012 Defendants. Trial Date: None 23 20 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 Pursuant to the parties’ “Stipulation of Dismissal of Action With 2 Prejudice,” and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 3 the above-referenced action be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, with 4 prejudice. Each party shall bear her or its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 DATED: January 21, 2014 10 11 _______________________________ HONORABLE CHRISTINA A. SNYDER United States District Court, Central District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Goff v. G2 Secure Staff, L.L.C., et al. Case No: CV12-10008 CAS (VBKx) 1 2 I am and was at all times herein mentioned over the age of 18 years and not a party to the action in which this service is made. At all times herein mentioned I 4 have been employed in the County of Orange in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. My business address is 695 5 Town Center Drive, Suite 1500, Costa Mesa, CA 92626. 3 6 On January ___, 2014, I served the following document(s) described as follows: 7 8 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 9 10 11 (the original) (a true copy thereof) in a sealed envelope addressed by placing as stated on the attorneys for Plaintiff, set forth below. with the Clerk of the United States District Court of Central District of 12 California, using the CM/ECF System. The Court’s CM/ECF System will send an 13 e-mail notification of the foregoing filing to the following parties and counsel of record who are registered with the Court’s CM/ECF System: 14 15 Bruce Kokozian, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff DEBRA GOFF KOKOZIAN LAW FIRM, APC 8383 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1018 17 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 (323) 857-5900 18 Fax: (323) 935-4919 19 bkokozian@kokozianlawfirm.com 16 20 I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the State Bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of 21 perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the above is true and correct. 22 23 24 Executed on January ___, 2014, at Costa Mesa, California. 25 Lara C. de Leon 26 Type or Print Name /s/Lara C. de Leon Signature 16848877.1 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?