Adela Ramirez v. Hobart Corporation et al

Filing 50

STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re Stipulation for Protective Order 46 . In order to preserve and maintain the confidentiality of certain confidential, commercial and/or proprietary documents and information produced or to be produced by ITW Food Equipment Group LLC ("ITW FEG")in this action, it is ordered that: SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. ***** NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT ***** (mp)

Download PDF
Case 2:: -cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:269 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 3 4 5 6 Adela Ramirez, et al., 7 CASE NO. 12-CV-10023-ABC (AGRx) [Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg] Plaintiffs, 8 VS. 9 10 11W Food Equipment Group LLC, 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 In order to preserve and maintain the confidentiality of certain confidential, 16 commercial and/or proprietary documents and information produced or to be I 17 produced by ITW Food Equipment Group LLC ("11W FBG") in this action, it is 18 I 19 I ordered that: 20 1. Documents to be produced by ITW FEG in this litigation that contain 21 22 confidential, commercially sensitive and/or proprietary information shall hereafter 23 I be referred to as "Protected Documents." A document or portion of a document that 24 25 26 27 28 I ITW FEG determines in good faith to be a Protected Document may be designated I as confidential by marking or placing the applicable notice "Subject to Non-Sharing I Protective Order," "Subject to Protective Order," "Confidential," or substantially I similar language on media containing Protected Documents, on the document itself, I STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:1-cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 2 of 13 Page ID #:270 I 2 or on a copy of the document, in such a way that it does not obscure the text or other I content of the document. 3 4 2. As used in this Order, the term "documents" means all written material, 5 videotapes and all other tangible items, produced in whatever format (e.g., hard 6 copy, electronic, digital, etc.) and on whatever media (e.g., hard copy, videotape, 7 8 computer diskette, CD-ROM, DVD, hard drive or otherwise). 9 10 11 3. Any document or any information designated as "Subject to Non- Sharing Protective Order," "Subject to Protective Order," "Confidential," or 12 substantially similar language in accordance with the provisions of this Order shall 13 only be used, shown or disclosed as provided in this Order. 14 15 4. If a party disagrees with the "Protected" designation of any document, 16 the party will so notifS, ITW FEG in a written letter, identifying the challenged 17 document(s) with specificity, including Bates number(s) where available. If the 18 19 parties are unable to resolve the issue of confidentiality regarding the challenged 20 document(s), ITW FEG will then timely apply to the Court to set a hearing for the 21 purpose of establishing that the challenged document(s) is/are confidential. Any 22 23 document so marked as "Protected" will continue to be treated as such pending 24 determination by the Court as to its confidential status. 25 5. Protected Documents and any copies thereof received pursuant to 26 27 paragraph 6 below shall be maintained confidential by the receiving party, his/her 28 2 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER I Case 2:i4-cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 3 of 13 Page ID #:271 1 2 3 4 11 attorney, other representatives, and expert witnesses, and shall be used only for lipreparation for the trial of this matter, subject to the limitations set forth herein. 6. Protected Documents shall be disclosed only to "Qualified Persons." 5 IQualified Persons are limited to: 6 7 8 a. Counsel of Record for the parties; b. Non-technical and clerical staff employed by Counsel of Record 9 and involved in the preparation and trial of this action; 10 C. 11 Experts and non-attorney consultants retained by the parties for 12 the preparation and/or trial of this case, provided that no 13 disclosure shall be made to any expert or consultant who is 14 employed by a competitor of ITW FEG; and 15 16 d. 17 18 19 The Court, the Court’s staff, witnesses, and the jury in this case; and e. With respect to documents designated as "Sharing" or "Subject 20 to Protective Order," attorneys representing Plaintiff(s), and the 21 experts and non-attorney consultants retained by such attorneys, 22 23 in other cases pending against ITW PEG relating to the MG 1532 24 mixer-grinder, provided no disclosure shall be made to any 25 expert or consultant who is employed by a competitor of ITW 26 27 FEG. 28 3 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER I Case 2:1"-cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 4 of 13 Page ID #:272 1 2 7. Plaintiff/Plaintiffs’ Counsel must make reasonable efforts to ensure the individuals described in paragraphs 6(c) and 6(e) above are Qualified Persons. 8. Before receiving access to any Protected Document or the information 5 contained therein, each person described in paragraphs 6(c) and 6(e) above shall 6 execute a "Written Assurance" in the form contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 7 8 Counsel for Plaintiffs shall retain each such executed Written Assurance and shall 9 keep a list identifying (a) all persons described in paragraphs 6(c) and 6(e) above to 10 whom Protected Documents have been disclosed, and (b) all Protected Documents 11 12 disclosed to such persons. Each such executed Written Assurance and list shall be 13 submitted to counsel for ITW FEG at the termination of this litigation or upon Order 14 of the Court requiring production, whichever comes first. However, for consulting 15 16 experts who were not designated as testifying experts, Plaintiffs’ counsel may redact 17 the name, address, and signature of the consultant before disclosing the executed 18 Exhibit A and document list for that person. To the extent the "Qualified Persons" 19 20 described in paragraph 6(c) or 6(e) above include privileged non-testifying expert 21 consultants, Counsel for Plaintiffs shall retain each such executed Exhibit A and 22 23 shall keep a list identifying (a) all such non-testifying expert consultants described 24 in paragraphs 6(c) and 6(e) above to whom Protected Documents have been 25 disclosed, and (b) all Protected Documents disclosed to such persons. In the event 26 27 that ITW FEG seeks to compel the production of each unredacted and executed 28 Exhibit A for good cause, Counsel for Plaintiffs shall submit each unredacted and 4 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:1-CV-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 5 of 13 Page ID #:273 1 executed Exhibit A and list to the Court for in camera inspection. Persons described 2 in paragraph 6(b) shall be covered under the signature of Counsel of Record. 9. 4 As the Protected Documents may only be distributed to Qualified 5 Persons, Plaintiff’s/Plaintiffs’ Counsel, and all persons described in paragraph 6 6 above, may not post Protected Documents on any website or internet accessible 8 document repository and shall not under any circumstance sell, offer for sale, 9 advertise, or publicize either the Protected Documents and the Confidential 10 information contained therein or the fact that such persons have obtained ITW 11 12 FEG’s Protected Documents and Confidential information. 13 14 10. To the extent that Protected Documents or information obtained therefrom are used in the taking of depositions and/or used as exhibits at trial, such 16 documents or information shall remain subject to the provisions of this Order, along 17 with the transcript pages of the deposition testimony and/or trial testimony dealing 18 with, referring to or referencing the Protected Documents or information. 19 11. All documents that are filed with the Court that contain any portion of 20 21 any Protected Document or information taken from any Protected Document shall -o Lc-f vtk4 i4k 22 be dunder seal pursuant to localowttpr.aeti i.n-a..seaied-n.velope-.orothr f rv.LL i- () 24 ppropriasea1edontner-en-whieh-hall-be-ender-sed-the4it1e-ef-the--aGt4Gn-to- 25 26 27 28 5 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:19-cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 6 of 13 Page ID #:274 n o - 1 2 or container shall not be order of the Court, excepi by officers of the 3 who, after reviewing the contents, 4 shWl-retVritheni the clerk in a sealed envelopeoainL 5 6 7 ’ 12. Any court reporter or transcriber who reports or transcri in this action shall agree that all "confidential" information designated as such under 8 this Order shall remain "confidential" and shall not be disclosed by them, except 9 pursuant to the terms of this Order, and that any notes or transcriptions of such 10 testimony (and any accompanying exhibits) will be retained by the reporter or 11 12 delivered to counsel of record. 13 14 15 13. To the extent ITW FEG is requested to produce documents it has ’determined should not be subject to the sharing provision of this protective order in 16 paragraph 6(e), ITW PEG will designate such documents as "Non-Sharing." 17 Documents designated as "Non-Sharing" shall not be shared under paragraph 6(e). 18 14. With respect to Protected Documents designated as "Non-Sharing," 19 20 within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of this case, counsel for the parties who 21 received Protected Documents, including any documents that any such party 22 disclosed to any person described in paragraph 6(c) above, shall either (a) return to 23 24 11W FEG the Protected Documents; or (b) securely destroy the Protected 25 Documents and certify such destruction to ITW FEG. 26 15. With respect to documents designated as "Sharing" or "Subject to 27 28 Protective Order," Counsel for the parties shall not be required to return the 6 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:1-cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 7 of 13 Page ID #:275 1 Protected Documents to ITW FEG after the conclusion of this case and may retain 2 the documents pursuant to the terms of this Order. 3 16. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents or information 5 containing confidential information that should have been designated as Protected 6 Document(s) shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of the party’s claims 8 of confidentiality. 9 10 17. This Protective Order may not be waived, modified, abandoned or terminated, in whole or part, except by an instrument in writing signed by the 12 parties. If any provision of this Protective Order shall be held invalid for any reason 13 whatsoever, the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby. 14 18. After termination of this litigation, the provisions of this Order shall 15 16 continue to be binding. This Court retains and shall have jurisdiction over the 17 parties and recipients of the Protected Documents for enforcement of the provisions 18 of this Order following termination of this litigation. 19 19. This Protective Order shall be binding upon the parties hereto, upon 20 21 their attorneys, and upon the parties’ and their attorneys’ successors, executors, 22 23 personal representatives, administrators, heirs, legal representatives, assigns, 24 subsidiaries, divisions, employees, agents, independent contractors, or other persons 25 or organizations over which they have control. 26 27 28 7 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:1-cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 8 of 13 Page ID #:276 1 20. A breach of the terms of this Orderi ’ ntitle ITW FEG to 3 appropriate sanctions, including, but not limited to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in the enforcement of this Order. 5 So Ordered, this 2&day of 2014. Gib r a Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rose erg 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2:12-cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 9 of 13 Page ID #:277 1 AGRE D and APPROVED: 3 LuizaManuelian (Bar No. SBN 233154) Sally Hosn (Bar No. SBN 276231). Poole & Shaffrey, LLP 5 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1100 6 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Attorneys for Defendant JTWFOOD EQUIPMENT GROUP LL /s/Elizabeth B. Wright 9 Elizabeth B. Wright (admitted pro hac vice) 10 Andrew H. Cox (admitted pro hac vice) Conor A. McLaughlin (admitted pro hac vice) 11 Thompson Nine LLP 12 3900 Key Center 127 Public Square 13 Cleveland, OH 44114-1291 14 Attorneys for Defendant JTW FOOD EQUIPMENT GROUP LLC 15 16 Isl Frank J. D’Oro 17 carl Kremer 18 Wesierski & Zurek LLP 1000 Wilshire Boulevard 19 Suite 1750 20 Los Angeles, California 90017 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ADELA RAMIR.EZ and 21 VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC. 22 24 Dennis W. Ryan Dennis W. Ryan, Inc. . 25 21731 Ventura Blvd., Suite 180 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 26 Telephone: (818) 313-8974 27 Attorney for PlaintiffADELA RAMIREZ 28 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORU1I( Case 2:12-cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 10 of 13 Page ID #:278 1 AGREED and APPROVED: 2 3 Luiza Manuelian (Bar No. SBN 233154) 4 Sally Hosn (Bar No. SBN 27623 1) Poole & Shaffrey, LLP 5 400 South Hope Street, Suite 1100 6 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Attorneys for Defendant ITWFOOD EQUIPMENT GROUP LLC 7 8 9 Elizabeth B. Wright (admitted pro hac vice) 10 Andrew H. Cox (admitted pro hac vice) Conor A. McLaughlin (admitted pro hac vice) 11 Thompson Hine LLP 12 3900 Key Center 127 Public Square 13 Cleveland, OH 44114-1291 14 Attorneys for Defendant ITWFOOD EQUIPMENT GROUP LLC 1 15 16 Frank J. D’Oro 17 Carl Kremer 18 Wesierski & Zurek LLP 1000 Wilshire Boulevard 19 Suite 1750 20 Los Angeles, California 90017 AttorneysforPlaintiffisADELA RAMIREZ and 21 VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC. 22 23 j,’ <_ 24 Dennis W. Ryan " Dennis W. Ryan, Inc. 25 21731 Ventura Blvd., Suite 180 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 26 Telephone: (818)313-8974 27 Attorney for PlaintiffADELA RAMJREZ 28 Prop ose d ShiNon-Shnrtmj1’rotctiv Otikr- v2 (L0IS53I8xC2I3A8).1 ShnringNoi-Sharing Piotet’wo Oder -v2 (101553 STIPULATED SHARING AND NON-SHARING PROTECTIVE ORDER Case 2 10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 11 of 13 Page ID #:279 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 2 3 4 5 Adela Ramirez, et al., 6 7 CASE NO. 12-CV-10023-ABC (AGRx) [Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg] Plaintiffs, VS. 8 9 ITW Food Equipment Group LLC, 10 Defendant. 11 EXHIBIT A 12 13 being AFFIDAVIT OF 14 duly sworn and personally appearing before the undersigned attesting officer, duly 15 authorized by law to administer oaths, deposes and says that the within statements 16 17 18 19 are true and correct: 1. I have read the Stipulated Sharing and Non-Sharing Protective Order attached 20 21 22 23 hereto, and I understand its terms and meanings. 2. I agree that my signature below submits me to the jurisdiction of the United 24 25 States District Court, Central District of California, in the above captioned case and 26 binds me to the provisions of the Stipulated Sharing and Non-Sharing Protective 27 Order, including to all promises undertaken in the Order, as if originally agreed by 28 me. Case 2:1 - cv-10023-ABC-AGR Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 12 of 13 Page ID #:280 1 2 Further Affiant sayeth not. This day of , 20. 3 4 5 AFFIANT 6 7 8 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of______________ 9 10 11 NOTARY PUBLIC 12 Name: No.: 13 My Commission Expires: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case 2:1-cv-10023-ABC-AGp Document 46 Filed 02/11/14 Page 13 of 13 Page ID #:281 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A copy of the foregoing was filed electronically this 11th day of February, 3 2013 with the Clerk of Court using the CM!ECF system. Service will, be made 5 through the Court’s CMIECF system on all parties and attorneys so registered, and 6 all parties may access this filing through the Court’s system. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Elizabeth B. Wright One of the Attorneys for Defendant 11W Food Equipment Group LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?