Ronnie Woodrow Bass v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
23
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle in the amount of $4,300, Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees, 22 . (mz)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Brian C. Shapiro
Attorney at Law: 192789
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-8868
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronnie Woodrow Bass
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RONNIE WOODROW BASS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 1 Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
15
Defendant
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:12-cv-10036-MAN
ORDER AWARDING EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28
U.S.C. § 1920
17
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal
18
19
Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses (“Stipulation”):
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on
February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted, therefore, for Commissioner
Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to
continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For simplicity, Plaintiff will refer to the Acting
Commissioner as the Commissioner.
-1-
1
IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $4,300, as
2
authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, shall be awarded subject to the terms of the
3
Stipulation.
DATE: May 7, 2014
4
5
6
___________________________________
MARGARET A. NAGLE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?