Barry Willis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
Filing
34
ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the parties' Stipulation to dismiss this case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 33 , the individual claims of plaintiff Barry W illis are dismissed with prejudice and the individual claims of Corey Goldstein, Paul Stemple and Carrie Couser and the putative class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement of this action. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
BARRY WILLIS; COREY
GOLDSTEIN; PAUL STEMPLE;
AND, CARRIE COUSER; individually
and on behalf of herself and all others
similarly situated
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
vs.
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; AND,
CHASE BANK (USA) N.A.,
Defendants.
) Case No. 2:12-cv-10252-DMG-SH
)
) ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION [33]
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation to dismiss
19
this case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the individual
20
claims of plaintiff Barry Willis are dismissed with prejudice and the individual claims
21
of Corey Goldstein, Paul Stemple and Carrie Couser and the putative class claims are
22
dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees.
23
This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement of this action.
24
25
26
DATED: June 25, 2014
_______________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?