Barry Willis v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Filing 34

ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the parties' Stipulation to dismiss this case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 33 , the individual claims of plaintiff Barry W illis are dismissed with prejudice and the individual claims of Corey Goldstein, Paul Stemple and Carrie Couser and the putative class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement of this action. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 BARRY WILLIS; COREY GOLDSTEIN; PAUL STEMPLE; AND, CARRIE COUSER; individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 vs. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; AND, CHASE BANK (USA) N.A., Defendants. ) Case No. 2:12-cv-10252-DMG-SH ) ) ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION [33] ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation to dismiss 19 this case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the individual 20 claims of plaintiff Barry Willis are dismissed with prejudice and the individual claims 21 of Corey Goldstein, Paul Stemple and Carrie Couser and the putative class claims are 22 dismissed without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees. 23 This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement of this action. 24 25 26 DATED: June 25, 2014 _______________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?