Ramelle Kamack v. Janda
Filing
21
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge 20 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAMELLE KAMACK,
12
v.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
14 J. SOTO, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Case No. CV 12-10737-JAK (OP)
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations
18 of the United States Magistrate Judge,
19
IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with
20 prejudice.
21
22 DATED: 11/20/2013
23
HONORABLE JOHN A. KRONSTADT
United States District Judge
24 Prepared by:
25
26
______________________________
27 HONORABLE OSWALD PARADA
United States Magistrate Judge
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?