Paris Hilton et al v. Perfumes Unlimited et al

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, WHEREAS Plaintiffs Paris Hilton and Parlux Fragrances, LLC and Defendant Perfumes Unlimited have entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as to the claims in the above referen ce matter, and have stipulated for the dismissal of the instant action. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as among the parties hereto that except as otherwise provided herein, this action is resolved with prejudice as to Defendant. re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 17 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (lmh)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Brent H. Blakely (SBN 157292)
[e-mail]
Michael Marchand (SBN 281080)
[e-mail]
BLAKELY LAW GROUP
915 North Citrus Avenue
Hollywood, California 90038
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

PARIS HILTON, an individual, and
PARLUX FRAGRANCES, LLC, a
Delaware corporation,
vs.

Plaintiffs,

PERFUMES UNLIMITED., an
unknown business entity, and DOES 110, inclusive;
Defendants..

) CASE NO. CV13-00070 -JEM
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL
) OF ACTION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL

1

WHEREAS Plaintiffs Paris Hilton and Parlux Fragrances, LLC and Defendant

2

Perfumes Unlimited have entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as

3

to the claims in the above reference matter, and have stipulated for the dismissal of the

4

instant action. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as among the

5

parties hereto that except as otherwise provided herein, this action is resolved with

6

prejudice as to Defendant.

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED

10
11

DATED:

July 25, 2013

____________________________
Honorable John McDermott

12

United States Magistrate Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL