M and D Burke Properties LP et al v. Russell et al
Filing
22
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT by Judge John F. Walter remanding case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number NC044650. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (kbr)
1
2
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
M &D BURKE PROPERTIES, L.P., a
11 California limited partnership,
MICHAEL P. BURKE, as trustee of the
12 Daniel C. Burke Irrevocable Trust, and
Daniel C. Burke as trustee of the Michael
13 P. Burke Irrevocable Trust,
Case No. CV 13-00081-JFW (JCGx)
14
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO
STATE COURT
15
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Judge John F. Walter
Courtroom 16
LASC Case No.: NC044650)
16 David W. Russell, D.W. RUSSELL CO.,
INC., a California corporation, and
17 DOES 1 to 50 inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
The Court, having reviewed the stipulation (the “Stipulation”) entered into by
24 and between Plaintiffs M & D Burke Properties, L.P., Michael P. Burke, as trustee
25 of the Daniel C. Burke Irrevocable Trust, and Daniel C. Burke as trustee of the
26 Michael P. Burke Irrevocable Trust (“Plaintiffs”), and defendants David W. Russell
27 and D.W. Russell Co., Inc. (“Defendants”), and good cause appearing therefor
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2400/026541-0005
4937295.2 a02/06/13
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE
COURT
-1-
1
1.
The action entitled M & D Burke Properties, L.P., et al. v. David W.
2 Russell, et al., Case No. NC044650, is remanded back to the Superior Court for the
3 State of California, County of Los Angeles.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 Dated:
February 6, 2013
The Hon. John F. Walter
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2400/026541-0005
4937295.2 a02/06/13
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE
COURT
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?