United States of America v. $54,400.00 In U S Currency
Filing
42
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FOREFEITURE by Judge R. Gary Klausner Related to: Notice of Lodging 41 . See judgment for details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (ah)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
STEVEN R. WELK
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section
VICTOR A. RODGERS
California Bar No. 101281
Assistant United States Attorney
Asset Forfeiture Section
Federal Courthouse, 14th Floor
312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-2569
Facsimile: (213) 894-7177
E-mail: Victor.Rodgers@usdoj.gov
JS-6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
WESTERN DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Case No. CV 13-00310-RGK(MRWx)
)
Plaintiff,
) [PROPOSED]
)
v.
) CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
)
$54,400.00 IN U.S.
)
CURRENCY,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
VIOLETA ATIGA,
)
)
Claimant.
)
24
25
26
On or about March 6, 2013, Plaintiff United States of
27
America (“the government,” “the United States of America” or
28
“plaintiff”) filed a First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture
1
alleging that the defendant $54,400.00 in U.S. Currency (the
2
“defendant currency”) is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18
3
U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).
Claimant Violeta Atiga (“Claimant”) filed a claim to the
4
5
defendant currency on or about August 9, 2013 and an answer to
6
the First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture on or about June 27,
7
2013.
8
2013, Rolando Lodevico Atiga waived any and all right to the
9
defendant currency and averred that Claimant was the sole and
In the claim filed by Claimant on or about August 9,
10
lawful owner of the defendant currency.
No other parties have
11
appeared in this case and the time for filing claims and answers
12
has expired.
The government and Claimant have now agreed to settle this
13
14
action and to avoid further litigation by entering into this
15
Consent Judgment of Forfeiture.
The Court, having been duly advised of and having
16
17
considered the matter, and based upon the mutual consent of the
18
parties hereto,
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
20
1.
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of
21
this action and the parties to this Consent Judgment of
22
Forfeiture.
2.
23
The First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture states a
24
claim for relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 21
25
U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).
3.
26
Notice of this action has been given as required by
27
law.
No appearances have been made in the litigation by any
28
person other than Claimant.
The Court deems that all other
2
1
potential claimants admit the allegations of the First Amended
2
Complaint for Forfeiture to be true.
3
4.
The sum of $30,000.00 only (without interest) shall be
4
returned to Claimant.
5
(i.e., $24,400.00), plus the interest earned by the United
6
States of America on the defendant currency shall be condemned
7
and forfeited to the United States of America, which shall
8
dispose of those funds in accordance with law.
9
5.
The remainder of the defendant currency
The funds to be returned to Claimant pursuant to
10
paragraph 4 above shall be paid to Claimant by electronic
11
transfer directly into the client trust account of Claimant’s
12
attorneys of record in this case.
13
attorney of record) shall provide all information and complete
14
all documents requested by the United States of America in order
15
for the United States of America to complete the transfer
16
including, without limitation, Claimant’s social security and
17
taxpayer identification numbers (if any), Claimant’s attorney of
18
record’s taxpayer identification number, and the identity of the
19
bank, the bank’s address and the account name, account number,
20
account type and wire transfer routing number for the attorney-
21
client trust account to which the transfer of funds is to be
22
made.
23
6.
Claimant (through Claimant’s
Claimant hereby releases the United States of America,
24
its agencies, agents, officers, employees and representatives,
25
including, without limitation, all agents, officers, employees
26
and representatives of the Drug Enforcement Administration or
27
the Department of Justice and their respective agencies, as well
28
as all agents, officers, employees and representatives of any
3
1
state or local governmental or law enforcement agency involved
2
in the investigation or prosecution of this matter, from any and
3
all claims, actions or liabilities arising out of or related to
4
this action, including, without limitation, any claim for
5
attorney fees, costs and interest, which may be asserted by or
6
on behalf of Claimant, whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 or
7
otherwise.
8
9
7.
The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for
the seizure of the defendant currency and institution of these
10
proceedings.
11
of reasonable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465.
12
8.
This judgment shall be construed as a certificate
The Court further finds that Claimant did not
13
substantially prevail in this action, and the parties hereto
14
shall bear their own attorney fees and costs.
15
Dated: February 16, 2017
_
16
17
THE HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1
2
CONSENT
The parties hereto consent to the above consent judgment of
3
forfeiture and waive any right of appeal.
4
Dated: February 10, 2017
5
6
7
EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
STEVEN R. WELK
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section
8
9
/s/ Victor A. Rodgers
_
VICTOR A. RODGERS
Assistant United States Attorney
Asset Forfeiture Section
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
12
13
Dated: February 10, 2017
LAW OFFICES OF GARY A. LAFF
14
15
16
17
By: Gary A. Laff
GARY A. LAFF
Attorneys for Claimant
VIOLETA ATIGA
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?