Benjamin Schwarz et al v. Erwin Meinberg et al

Filing 134

JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell,Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 90) is granted andjudgment is entered in favor Brenda Burch, Charles E Samuels, Erwin Meinberg, Harley G Lappin, Jr, Juan D Castillo, Kathleen M Kenney, Linda Thomas, Robert E McFadden, Susan G McClintock, Tammy Jones, Thomas R Kane, William F Dalius, Jr. 132 . Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 54) is denied with prejudice; Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff Benjamin Schwarz; and In accordance with this Courts January 13, 2017 Order, this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

BENJAMIN SCHWARZ,
Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

vs.
ERWIN MEINBERG, et al.
Defendants.

Case No: CV 13-00356 BRO (PLAx)
JUDGMENT
Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell
United States District Judge

1

Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, consistent with this

2

Court’s January 13, 2017 Order Re Evidentiary Hearing Regarding Exhaustion Of

3

Administrative Remedies (Doc. 132) and the December 20, 2016 evidentiary hearing,

4

and the entirety of the record in this case, this Court ORDERS AND ENTERS FINAL

5

JUDGMENT as follows:

6

1.

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 90) is granted and

7

judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Erwin Meinberg, Brenda Burch, Robert E.

8

McFadden, Susan G. McClintock, Kathleen M. Kenney, Harley G. Lappin, Jr.,

9

Charles E. Samuels, Thomas R. Kane, William F. Dalius, Jr., Juan D. Castillo, Linda

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

R. Thomas, Tammy Jones (collectively, “Defendants”) on all causes of action;
2.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 54) is denied with

prejudice;
3.

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff

Benjamin Schwarz; and
4.

In accordance with this Court’s January 13, 2017 Order, this action is

dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19
20
21
22

DATED: January 30, 2017
By:
Honorable Beverly R. O’Connell
United States District Court Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
1