Kevin Pampena v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al

Filing 16

ORDER re MOTION to Dismiss Case 11 by Judge Manuel L. Real. After reviewing the motion, opposition and reply briefs and after hearing argument of counsel, the Court hereby grants Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLCs Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, with prejudice and without leave to amend, as to all defendants named in the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (kti)

Download PDF
1 STEPHEN T. KITAGAWA (SBN 194254) JILLIAN A. BENBOW (SBN 246822) 2 PITE DUNCAN, LLP 1920 Main Street, Suite 760 3 Irvine, CA 92614 (714) 285-2633 4 (714) 285-2668 facsimile E-Mail: skitagawa@piteduncan.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 Kevin Pampena, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. CV13-00480 R (PJWx) Plaintiff, Judge Manuel L. Real Courtroom 8 v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC; CAL WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION; U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE LXS 2007-4N TRUST, Defendants. ORDER ON DEFENDANT NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Date: March 18, 2013 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 8 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 18, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 8 of the above-referenced Court, located at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, the Court heard Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. After reviewing the motion, opposition and reply briefs and after hearing argument of counsel, the Court hereby grants Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, with prejudice and without leave to amend, as to all defendants named in the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: _March 22, 2013__ ___________________________________ THE HON. MANUEL L. REAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER ON NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS on MTD.wpd 13-cv-480 Pampena Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?