Kevin Pampena v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
Filing
16
ORDER re MOTION to Dismiss Case 11 by Judge Manuel L. Real. After reviewing the motion, opposition and reply briefs and after hearing argument of counsel, the Court hereby grants Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLCs Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, with prejudice and without leave to amend, as to all defendants named in the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (kti)
1 STEPHEN T. KITAGAWA (SBN 194254)
JILLIAN A. BENBOW (SBN 246822)
2 PITE DUNCAN, LLP
1920 Main Street, Suite 760
3 Irvine, CA 92614
(714) 285-2633
4 (714) 285-2668 facsimile
E-Mail: skitagawa@piteduncan.com
5
Attorneys for Defendant NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
Kevin Pampena,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. CV13-00480 R (PJWx)
Plaintiff,
Judge Manuel L. Real
Courtroom 8
v.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC;
CAL WESTERN RECONVEYANCE
CORPORATION; U.S. BANK, N.A., AS
TRUSTEE FOR THE LXS 2007-4N
TRUST,
Defendants.
ORDER ON DEFENDANT
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,
LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Date:
March 18, 2013
Time:
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 8
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On March 18, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 8 of the above-referenced Court,
located at 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, the Court heard
Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint.
After reviewing the motion, opposition and reply briefs and after hearing argument
of counsel, the Court hereby grants Defendant Nationstar Mortgage, LLC’s Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, with prejudice and without leave to amend, as to all
defendants named in the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: _March 22, 2013__
___________________________________
THE HON. MANUEL L. REAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS on MTD.wpd
13-cv-480 Pampena Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?