Kobe Falco v. Nissan North America Inc et al

Filing 343

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Under Rules 54(b) and 58, it is adjudged as follows: 1.The Court entered a Final Approval Order approving the Settlement. 2.For the reasons stated in the Courts Final Approval Order, judgment is hereby ente red in accordance with the Final Approval Order and3.Plaintiffs claims asserted against Defendants in this action are dismissed with prejudice, without costs to any party, except as provided for in the Final Approval Order or Settlement Agreement. (shb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Case No.: 2:13-cv-00686-DDP-MAN KOBE FALCO, JOEL SEGUIN, ALFREDO PADILLA, and ROBERTO GALVAN, individually, and on behalf of other members of the public similarly situated, 17 18 19 Courtroom: 9C – 9th Floor Judge: Hon. Dean D. Pregerson Plaintiffs, 15 16 FINAL JUDGMENT vs. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. a California corporation, and NISSAN JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA d/b/a NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD., a publicly traded company in Japan, 20 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT 1 FINAL JUDGMENT 2 Under Rules 54(b) and 58, it is adjudged as follows: 3 1. The Court entered a Final Approval Order approving the Settlement; 4 2. For the reasons stated in the Court’s Final Approval Order, judgment is 5 hereby entered in accordance with the Final Approval Order; and 6 3. Plaintiffs’ claims asserted against Defendants in this action are dismissed 7 with prejudice, without costs to any party, except as provided for in the Final Approval 8 Order or Settlement Agreement. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: 7-19-18 Honorable Dean D. Pregerson United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No.: 2:13-cv-00686-DDP-MAN [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?