Robert Potter et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("the FDIC"), acting as the receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction #29 is GRANTED. Additionally, because the FDIC's presence of this case was the sole basis upon which the Court exercised jurisdiction over this case, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remainder of the case, and hereby REMANDS this case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC459627. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) Court Reporter: Not Present. (Attachments: #1 CV-103 Remand Transmittal Letter) (gk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
Date: May 8, 2013
Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
111 North Hill Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Re: Case Number: CV 13-00863 CAS (AGRx)
Previously Superior Court Case No. BC459627
Case Name: Robert Potter, et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, et al.
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on 5/8/2013
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: G. Kami
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
CV - 103 (09/08)
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?