Cathy A Hodges v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
17
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency 16 . The Court, having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (Stipulation to Remand) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
LYNN M. HARADA [C.S.B.N. 267616]
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region IX
160 Spear St., Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415-977-8977
Facsimile: 415-744-0134
e-mail: Lynn.Harada@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
12
13
14
15
CATHY A. HODGES,
Plaintiff,
vs.
16
17
18
19
20
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
_______________________________
) No. 2:13-cv-01039-AGR
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
21
22
23
24
25
26
The Court, having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
(“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment
of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the
27
28
-1-
1
above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further
2
proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
3
4
5
6
DATED: September 13, 2013
HON. ALICIA G. ROSENBERG
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?