Cathy A Hodges v. Michael J Astrue

Filing 17

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, Related to: Order to Remand Case to US Agency 16 . The Court, having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (Stipulation to Remand) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division LYNN M. HARADA [C.S.B.N. 267616] Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration, Region IX 160 Spear St., Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415-977-8977 Facsimile: 415-744-0134 e-mail: Lynn.Harada@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 14 15 CATHY A. HODGES, Plaintiff, vs. 16 17 18 19 20 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _______________________________ ) No. 2:13-cv-01039-AGR ) JUDGMENT OF REMAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Court, having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the 27 28 -1- 1 above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further 2 proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 3 4 5 6 DATED: September 13, 2013 HON. ALICIA G. ROSENBERG UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?