Federal National Mortgage Association v. Perez et al
Filing
6
ORDER Remanding Action to Los Angeles Superior Court for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. For the reasons stated, defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that the court has subject matter jurisdiction to hear the action. As a consequence, the clerk is directed to remand the case to Los Angeles Superior Court forthwith. Case number 12UO1553 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (bp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/14/2013: # 1 remand letter) (bp).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
SOUTHERN DIVISION
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
(714) 338-4750
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY NAFISI
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 328-4450
Date: March 14, 2013
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
Name & Address
Los Angeles County Superior Court
350 W. Mission Blvd.
Pomona, CA 91766
Re: Case Number: CV12-1083-MMM(AJWx)
Previously Superior Court Case No. 12UO1553
Case Name: Federal National Mortgage Association -v- Carlos Perez, et al
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
March 14, 2013
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Court.
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: Brent Pacillas
Deputy Clerk
G Western
✘
213-894-
G Eastern
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
By:
Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?