Librado Solano v. Starfas et al

Filing 60

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II 59 .IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendants motion for summary judgment is denied as to Plaintiffs excessive force claim against Defendants Ke rekes and Ascedo and Plaintiffs failure to intervene claim against Defendant Dullen. Defendants motion for summary judgment is granted as to Plainitffs claims against Defendants Starfas and Johnson as well as Plaintiffs deliberate indifference to medical needs claim 46 . (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 LIBRADO SOLANO, JR., 12 Plaintiff, v. 13 14 JOSEPH DAVIS et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 13-01164-ODW (DFM) Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended 20 Complaint, the parties’ motion and opposition papers, the records on file, and 21 the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate 22 Judge. Neither party has filed any written objections to the report. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted. 25 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied as to 26 Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendants Kerekes and Ascedo and 27 Plaintiff’s failure to intervene claim against Defendant Dullen. 28 /// 1 3. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted as to 2 Plainitff’s claims against Defendants Starfas and Johnson as well as Plaintiff’s 3 deliberate indifference to medical needs claim. 4 5 Dated: November 17, 2014 ______________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT II United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?