In re Chang Sup Han

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8006, an appellant must file within 14 days after a notice of appeal, (1) a designation of items to be included in the record on appea l, and (2) a statement of issues to be presented. To the Court's knowledge, Appellant has not done this in this appeal. The Notice of Appeal wasfiled on February 25, 2013. (ECF No. 2 .) Appellant Brewster is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writ ing no later than April 22, 2013, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with the applicable rules. No hearing will be held. Failure to timely respond to this order will result in dismissal of this appeal. (jre)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 IN RE CHANG SUP HAN 11 Debtor. Case No. 2:13-cv-1524-ODW Bankruptcy Case No. 2:11-bk-30025-RK Adversary Case No. 2:11-ap-2632-RK 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION 13 14 15 Under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8006, an appellant must file 16 within 14 days after a notice of appeal, (1) a designation of items to be included in the 17 record on appeal, and (2) a statement of issues to be presented. To the Court’s 18 knowledge, Appellant has not done this in this appeal. The Notice of Appeal was 19 filed on February 25, 2013. (ECF No. 2.) 20 Appellant Brewster is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no 21 later than April 22, 2013, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of 22 prosecution and failure to comply with the applicable rules. No hearing will be held. 23 Failure to timely respond to this order will result in dismissal of this appeal. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 April 11, 2013 26 27 28 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?