Steven J Berns v. Sentry Select Insurance Company et al

Filing 106

JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)

Download PDF
1 JS 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 STEVEN J. BERNS, an individual 12 residing in the State of California, Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No. 2:13-cv-01611-DSF-AGR [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT v. 15 SENTRY SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; and 16 DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, 17 Defendant. 18 19 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUGED in this action as follows: 1. On the First Amended Complaint's First Cause of Action for 20 Declaratory Relief regarding the duty to defend, that judgment be entered in favor of 21 plaintiff, Steven J. Berns, and against defendant, Sentry Select Insurance Company. 22 2. On the First Amended Complaint's Second Cause of Action for Breach 23 of Contract regarding the duty to defend, that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff, 24 Steven J. Berns and against defendant, Sentry Select Insurance Company. Plaintiff, 25 Steven J. Berns, has acknowledged that defendant, Sentry Select Insurance Company, 26 has satisfied the judgment for the second cause of action in full, including all interest 27 due. 28 1 2:13-cv-01611-DSF-AGR 1 3. On the First Amended Complaint's Third Cause of Action for Tortious 2 Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, that judgment be entered in 3 favor of defendant, Sentry Select Insurance Company, and against plaintiff, Steven J. 4 Berns. The Third Cause of Action for Tortious Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith 5 and Fair Dealing is dismissed with prejudice. 6 Each party to bear its own costs and expenses. 7 8 9 10 11 DATED: 8/3/17 BY: ______________________________ DALE S. FISCHER United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 2:13-cv-01611-DSF-AGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?