Jorge Molina v. Warden
Filing
28
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Otis D. Wright. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation 15 ; and (2) directing that the Amended Judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (adu)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JORGE MOLINA,
Petitioner,
12
13
14
v.
WARDEN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 13-2022-ODW (OP)
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING,
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended
18 Petition, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the
19 United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner’s Objections thereto. The Court
20 concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the
21 Magistrate Judge.
22 / / /
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28
1
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) accepting this Report and
2 Recommendation; and (2) directing that the Amended Judgment be entered denying
3 the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
4
5
6 DATED: June 11, 2014
7
8
9 Prepared by:
10
11 ______________________________
HONORABLE OSWALD PARADA
12 United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HONORABLE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?