Jared Andresen et al v. International Paper Company et al

Filing 244

JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder, NOW, IN LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING, IT IS THEREFOREORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered as follows: 1. In favor of International Paper and against Farris on all of Farriss claims; 2. In favor of I nternational Paper and against Andresen on all of Andresens claims; 3. In favor of Duffy and against International Paper in the amount of $8,148.48 on Duffys claim for commissions, and in favor of International Paper and against Duffy on all of Duffys remaining claims; 4. In favor of International Paper and against Bekiarian on all of Bekiarians claims; and 5. The special verdict, and the jurys judgment thereon, is approved by the Court. (pj)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
MARCUS A. TORRANO (BAR NO. 138874)
AMY McGINNIS GILLINGER (BAR NO. 240619)
EMILIE C. WOODHEAD (BAR NO. 240464)
JASON S. CAMPBELL (BAR NO. 285044)
333 S. Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.615-1750
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543

Winston & Strawn LLP

10

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

DANIEL FARRIS, an individual,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER INC., and
DOES 1 through 100,

16

19

v.
YEGHIA (AKA LEE) BEKIARIAN,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
XXXXXXXXX

Third Party Complaint filed: 5/30/14

Third Party Defendant.

20
21

[Assigned to Courtroom 218-J/5 –
Honorable Christina A. Snyder, Judge,
for all Purposes]

Defendants and Third Party
Plaintiff,

17
18

Case No. EDCV13-0485-CAS (SPx);
Related to No. CV13-2079-CAS (AJWx)

Related to:
JARED ANDRESEN, an individual,
YEGHIA BEKIARIAN, an individual,
and JOHN DUFFY, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY,
dba CONTAINER THE AMERICAS, a
New York Corporation; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

WHEREAS on December 2, 2014, the above-captioned consolidated actions

2

came on for trial before the above-entitled Court (the Honorable Christina A. Snyder,

3

United States District Judge, presiding) and a duly empanelled jury; and

4
5
6

WHEREAS the trial of the consolidated actions was previously bifurcated by
the Court, and Phase I of the trial was duly tried before the jury; and
WHEREAS on December 12, 2014, the jury rendered its verdict as follows:

7

1.

In favor of Defendant International Paper Company (“International

8

Paper”) and against Plaintiffs Daniel Farris, Jared Andresen, John

9

Duffy, and Yeghia Bekiarian (collectively “Plaintiffs”) on

333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543

Plaintiffs’ claims for vacation wages pursuant to California Labor

11
Winston & Strawn LLP

10

Code § 227.3 and for waiting-time penalties pursuant to California

12

Labor Code §§ 202 and 203;

13

2.

14

Andresen’s claim for severance pay;

15

3.

16
17

In favor of International Paper and against Andresen on

In favor of Duffy and against International Paper on Duffy’s claim
for failure to pay commissions in the amount of $8,148.48.

WHEREAS Phase II of the trial, concerning International Paper’s counterclaim

18

and Third Party Complaint against Bekiarian and Bekiarian’s counterclaim and

19

counterclaim-in-reply against International Paper, was mooted as a result of the jury’s

20

verdict and thus did not proceed;

21

WHEREAS the Court dismissed the jury on December 15, 2014; and

22

WHEREAS the Court accordingly dismissed International Paper’s counterclaim

23
24
25

and Third Party Complaint against Bekiarian on December 16, 2014;
NOW, IN LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING, IT IS THEREFORE
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered as follows:

26

1.

In favor of International Paper and against Farris on all of Farris’s claims;

27

2.

In favor of International Paper and against Andresen on all of Andresen’s

28

claims;
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

3.

In favor of Duffy and against International Paper in the amount of

2

$8,148.48 on Duffy’s claim for commissions, and in favor of International Paper and

3

against Duffy on all of Duffy’s remaining claims;

4
5

4.
claims; and

6
7

In favor of International Paper and against Bekiarian on all of Bekiarian’s

5.

The special verdict, and the jury’s judgment thereon, is approved by the

Court.

8
9
10

DATED: April 2, 2015

333 S. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1543

Winston & Strawn LLP

11

By:
Hon. Christina A. Snyder
United States District Court Judge

12
13
14

LA:374588.2

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT