Grayling Taylor et al v. Shippers Transport Express Inc et al
Filing
249
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. (jloz)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
GRAYLING TAYLOR, an individual, ) Case No.: CV13-02092-BRO(PLAx)
and BRUCE BROWN, an individual, )
on behalf of themselves and others
)
similarly situated,
) AMENDED JUDGMENT
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
) Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell
SHIPPERS TRANSPORT EXPRESS, )
INC., a California corporation; SSA
)
MARINE, INC., a Washington
)
corporation; and DOES 1 to 10,
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
18
19
20
21
On May 14, 2015, this Court issued an Order granting Plaintiffs’ Motions for Final
Approval of Class Action Settlement and Attorneys’ Fees (Document No. 246). For all
the reasons stated in that Order, the Court GRANTS final approval of the Settlement
22
23
24
reached between the parties in this class action, and GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Fees, as follows:
25
-1AMENDED JUDGMENT
1
1.
This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Settlement
2
and all capitalized terms used in this Judgment that are not otherwise defined shall have
3
the same meanings as set forth in the Settlement.
4
2.
The Court finds that this Settlement satisfies the requirements for class
5
6
action settlement under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and further finds
7
that the Class Members have at all times been adequately represented by the class
8
representative and Class Counsel. The Class includes that class of drivers certified by the
9
Court's March 10, 2014 order (Document No. 71), plus any other driver who entered into
10
11
a truck lease agreement with Shippers Transport Express, Inc. in California after the
12
Claims Administrator, Gilardi & Company, LLC, first sent notice of the class action in
13
June 2014 through the date of the preliminary settlement approval on March 4, 2015.
14
15
The Class also includes those Class Members who were identified and subsequently
16
agreed to by the parties during the claims administration process, as shown in Exhibit A
17
hereto. The Class does not include the 12 drivers listed in Exhibit B hereto who timely
18
and validly opted out upon notice of class certification.
19
20
3.
The Court finds that the Notice given to the Class Members fully complied
21
with Rule 23, was the best notice practicable, satisfies the requirements of due process,
22
and provides the Court with jurisdiction over the Class Members.
23
4.
The Court has concluded that the Settlement as set forth in the Settlement
24
25
Agreement executed by the parties is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court finds the
-2AMENDED JUDGMENT
1
2
3
$11,040,000 Class Settlement Amount established pursuant to the Settlement Agreement
is reasonable and adequate.
5.
The Court finds that the plan for distribution of the Net Settlement Amount
4
among the Class Members as described in the Settlement Agreement is fair and
5
6
7
8
reasonable.
6.
The Settlement is hereby APPROVED in all respects, and the releases
encompassed therein are effectuated.
9
7.
The Court AWARDS Class Counsel attorneys’ fees in the amount of
10
11
12
13
$3,680,000.
8.
The Court AWARDS Class Counsel reimbursement of costs in the amount
of $291,160.45.
14
15
9.
The Court AWARDS an incentive payment to Named Plaintiffs Bruce
16
Brown and Grayling Taylor in the amount of $15,000 each; and to active class members
17
Elroy Lambey and Mario Giron the amounts of $10,000 and $7,500, respectively.
18
10.
The Court APPROVES the payment of civil penalties under California’s
19
20
Private Attorney General Act in the amount of $50,000. Pursuant to the prescribed
21
allocation under section 2699 of the California Labor Code, 75% of said amount shall be
22
distributed to the Labor and Workplace Development Agency and 25% shall revert to and
23
be deemed part of the Net Settlement Amount for distribution to the Class Members.
24
25
-3AMENDED JUDGMENT
1
2
3
11.
The Court approves payment of the administration costs to the Claims
Administrator, Gilardi & Co. LLC, in the amount of $29,300.80.
12.
The Court hereby gives final approval to, and orders that the payment of, the
4
amounts described in paragraphs 6 to 10 above be paid out of the Class Settlement
5
6
7
8
Amount in accordance with the Settlement Agreement.
13.
The parties are hereby ordered to consummate the Settlement in accordance
with the terms and provisions therein.
9
14.
The First Amended Complaint filed on February 22, 2013, is hereby
10
11
dismissed with prejudice, without costs to any party, except as otherwise provided in the
12
Settlement Agreement.
13
15.
This document shall constitute a final judgment with respect to the claims of
14
15
16
17
the Class Members for purpose of Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
14.
Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court retains
continuing jurisdiction over: (i) implementation of the Settlement; (ii) the allowance,
18
disallowance or adjustment of any Class Member’s claim on equitable grounds and any
19
20
award or distribution of the Class Settlement Amount; (iii) disposition of the Class
21
Settlement Amount; (iv) all Parties for the purpose of construing, enforcing and
22
administering the Settlement and this Judgment; and (v) other matters related or ancillary
23
to the foregoing.
24
25
-4AMENDED JUDGMENT
1
16.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1715 (d), this Judgment granting final approval of
2
the proposed settlement may not be issued or entered earlier than June 4, 2015 which is
3
90 days after the date on which the appropriate Federal and State officials were served
4
with the notice required under subsection (b). The Court expressly directs the Clerk of
5
6
Court to enter judgment in accordance with these terms.
7
8
Dated: June 4, 2015
9
10
11
____________________________
Beverly Reid O’Connell
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-5AMENDED JUDGMENT
EXHIBIT A
Exhibit A: Class Members Identified and Agreed to by the Parties During Claims
Administration
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
KEITH DAFNEY
REYES OMAR GONZALES
CARLOS GARCIA
JORGE GONZALEZ
OSWALD RIVAS
ENRIQUE PEREZ
ARNOLDO ANTONIO OSTORGA
EXHIBIT B
List of timely Requests for Exclusion
First Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Last Name
CRUZ EDGARDO
JESUS (JOSE)
ROBERTO
DAVID
JOSE ERIC
MOISES
JOSE ANTONIO
RENATO PEIXOTO
DILLINGER
OSCAR
OTTO
HERNAN ROBLETO
AGUILAR
ALVAREZ GALLEGOS
BONILLA
CABADAS
CACERES
CALIX
ESTRADA
FERRANTE
GONZALEZ
MARMOL
MARTINEZ
OROCHELA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?