Michelle McGowan v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Filing
66
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES as follows: Electrolux Home Products, Inc. and all other Releasees shall be released from any and all Released Claims any Class Member had, has, or may have in the fu ture, except for those individuals who timely excluded themselves from the Settlement. All claims, counts, and causes of action alleged in this action on behalf of Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves, the Settlement Class, or both, are hereby dismissed in their entirety with prejudice. See document for further details. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SHAWN ROBERTS, et al.,
11
12
13
14
15
Master File No. SACV12-1644CAS(VBKx)
Plaintiffs,
CLASS ACTION
vs.
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS,
INC.,
The Honorable Christina A. Snyder
Defendants.
16
17
This Document Relates To: All Actions.
18
19
On September 11, 2014, the Court issued its Order Granting Joint Motion
20
for Final Approval of Class Settlement and Final Judgment, Granting Class
21
Counsel’s Application for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards, and
22
Overruling Objections to Settlement (the “Final Approval Order”) (ECF No. 64).
23
In doing so, the Court granted final approval to the Settlement, awarded the
24
requested attorneys’ fees and costs, awarded the requested incentive payments to
25
the Class Representatives, and overruled all objections made to the Settlement.
26
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, the Court, in accordance with the Final Approval
27
Order, ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES as follows:
28
-1[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
MASTER FILE NO. 8:12-cv-01644-CAS-VBK
1.
1
Electrolux Home Products, Inc. (“Electrolux”) and all other
2
Releasees1 shall be released from any and all Released Claims any Class Member
3
had, has, or may have in the future, except for those individuals who timely
4
excluded themselves from the Settlement.2
2.
5
All claims, counts, and causes of action alleged in this action on
6
behalf of Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves, the Settlement Class, or both, are
7
hereby dismissed in their entirety with prejudice.
3.
8
In entering this Final Judgment, the Court specifically refers to and
9
invokes the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution and the
10
doctrine of comity, and requests that any court in any other jurisdiction reviewing,
11
construing, or applying this Judgment implement and enforce its terms in their
12
entirety.
13
4.
Without affecting the finality of this Final Judgment in any way, the
14
Court retains continuing jurisdiction over (1) implementation of this Settlement
15
and this action; (2) all matters relating to the administration and consummation of
16
the Settlement; and (3) all Parties to this action for the purpose of implementing,
17
enforcing, and monitoring compliance with, effectuating, administering, and
18
interpreting the provisions of the Settlement Agreement, the Final Approval
19
Order, and this Final Judgment.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: September 15, 2014
22
Honorable Christina A. Snyder
United States District Judge
23
24
25
1
26
Capitalized terms shall have the same meaning as defined in the Settlement Agreement.
2
27
A list of those individuals is attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Kenneth A. Stalzer,
filed with this Court on August 8, 2014 (ECF No. 162-2).
28
2
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
MASTER FILE NO. 8:12-cv-01644-CAS-VBK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?