Danilo Jose v. Fremont Investment and Loan et al

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSSAL by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. THE COURT having ordered the Plaintiff to show cause in writing, not later than October 22, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and Plaintiff having failed to respond, THE COURT ORDERS that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk shall mail, FAX or E:mail a copy of this Order to all counsel. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6). (rp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANILO JOSE,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

v.
FREMONT INVESTMENT AND
LOAN, et al.,

15
Defendants.
16
____________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.

CV 13-02467 DDP (AJWx)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

17
18

THE COURT having ordered the Plaintiff to show cause in writing, not later than

19

October 22, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and

20

Plaintiff having failed to respond,

21

THE COURT ORDERS that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed without

22

prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court,

23

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

24

The Clerk shall mail, FAX or E:mail a copy of this Order to all counsel.

25
26
27
28

Dated: October 30, 2013
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge