Kali A Gordon v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al
Filing
36
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 35 , all of Plaintiffs causes of action against Defendants in the matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice, all parties to bear their own fees and costs. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
GREGORY W. KNOPP (SBN 237615)
DAMIEN P. DELANEY (SBN 246476)
GALIT A. KNOTZ (SBN 252962)
gknopp@akingump.com
ddelaney@akingump.com
gknotz@akingump.com
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: 310-229-1000
Facsimile: 310-229-1001
Attorneys for Defendant
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
KALI A. GORDON, an individual
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, dba
Starbucks Coffee Company, a
Washington Company; and DOES 150,
Defendants.
Case No. CV13-02660-CAS (PJWx)
[Hon. Christina Snyder]
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Date Action Filed: February 21, 2013
Date Action Removed: April 16, 2013
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 2:13-cv-02660-CAS
1
2
3
4
5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The Parties' Stipulation of Dismissal is hereby so ordered. All of Plaintiffs causes
of action against Defendants in the above captioned matter are hereby dismissed with
prejudice, all parties to bear their own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: _December 5, 2013
______________
Hon. Christina A. Snyder
United States District Court Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE
Case No. 2:13-cv-02660-CAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?