CNH America LLC v. Harry Group Inc

Filing 33

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 32 . IT IS ORDERED THAT The within matter shall be dismissed without prejudice from the United States District Court, Central District of California. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jloz)

1 SAMAN BEHNAM, ESQ., (SBN: 195310)

LAW OFFICES OF SAMAN BEHNAM

2 A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

SOVEREIGN BUILDING

3 354 West Ocean Boulevard. Suite 101
4

Long Beach, CA 90802

JS-6

Tel: [phone]

5 Fax: [phone]
6 Attorney for Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff

HARRY GROUP, dba JMKC EXPRESS, and

7 Cross-Defendant THOMAS VILLARDI
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT

10
CNH AMERICA, LLC,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
HARRY GROUP, INC., dba JMKC
14 EXPRESS,
15

Defendants.
___________________________________

16
HARRY GROUP, INC., dba JMKC
17 EXPRESS,
18
19

Third-Party Plaintiff,
vs.

20 FREDERICK H. JOHRING, an
individual, GOLDEN STATE
21 LOGISTICS, INC., a California
Corporation, GOLDEN STATE
22 EXPRESS, INC., a California Corporation
and ROES 1 through 100, inclusive,
23
Third-Party Defendants.
24 ___________________________________
25 CONTINUED, NEXT PAGE
___________________________________
26

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL CASE NO:
CV-13-02864-MWF (Ex)
PROPOSED ORDER RE:
STIPULATION BETWEEN
REMAINING PARTIES TO
DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

27 //
28 //
PROPOSED ORDER

Page -1-

1 FREDERICK H. JOHRING, an
individual, GOLDEN STATE
2 LOGISTICS, INC., a California
Corporation,
3
Cross-Claimants,
4
vs.
5
HARRY GROUP, INC., dba JMKC
6 EXPRESS, THOMAS VILLARDI, an
individual,
7
Cross-Defendants.
8 ___________________________________

O-R-D-E-R

9
10

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

The parties having stipulated by and through their counsel of record, the court

11 having been duly informed in the premises and good cause appearing,
12

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

13

The within matter shall be dismissed without prejudice from the United

14

States District Court, Central District of California.

15
16 Dated:

January 15, 2014
______________________

17
18
19

____________________________________

20

JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL DISTRICT
COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

PROPOSED ORDER

Page -2-