Matthew Cappuccio v. Pepperdine University

Filing 89

AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall recover $120,000 from Defendant. Plaintiff shall recover reasonable attorney's fees in the amount of $102,153.75 and costs from Defendant in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.54 and L.R. 54, as well as 29 U.S.C. 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Related to: Judgment, 77 (See order for specifics) (bp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATTHEW CAPPUCCIO, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. ____________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV 13-3125 DSF (AJWx) AMENDED JUDGMENT This action was tried by a jury commencing on July 22, 2014. Plaintiff Matthew Cappuccio appeared by attorneys Michael J. Freiman, Esq. and Lawrence W. Freiman, Esq., and Defendant Pepperdine University appeared by attorney Philip Ewen. The jury found in favor of Plaintiff as to the claim of violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act only in the amount of $120,000. The Court strikes the noneconomic damages award as being unavailable pursuant to the parties’ stipulation on the record. By reason of the jury’s verdict, Plaintiff is entitled to judgment against Defendant. 1 It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall recover $120,000 2 from Defendant. Plaintiff shall recover reasonable attorney’s fees in the amount 3 of $102,153.75 and costs from Defendant in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 4 and L.R. 54, as well as 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/26/14 ____________________________ Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?