Restoration Industry Association Inc. v. ThermaPure, Inc.
Filing
126
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge James V. Selna re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 125 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (nbo)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KNEAFSEY & FRIEND LLP
Sean M. Kneafsey (SBN 180863)
skneafsey@kneafseyfriend.com
800 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 710
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Tel: (213) 892-1200
Fax: (213) 892-1208
Attorney for Thermapure, Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SOUTHERN DIVISION
11
12
13
RESOTRATION INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
v.
THERMAPURE, INC,
Case No. 2:13-cv-03169-JVS-RZ
Consolidated with
2:13−cv−04052−JVS−RZ and 2:13cv-08523-JVS-RZ
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Defendant.
18
19
JS-6
AND RELATED ACTIONS
Date: July 28, 2014
Time; 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom No.: 10C
20
21
WHEREAS, the Restoration Industry Association, Inc., (“RIA”) filed the
22
action of Restoration Industry Association, Inc. v. Thermapure Inc., Case No. 2:13-
23
cv-01369 JVS (RZx) asserting in its Third Amended Complaint a cause of action
24
seeking a Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 (the
25
“‘812 Patent”) contending that the ‘812 Patent is invalid and unenforceable.
26
WHEREAS, Thermapure filed the action of Thermapure v. Water Out
27
Oregon, Case No: 11-cv-05958-BHS (W.D. Wash.), now consolidated as Case No.
28
-1ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
2:13-cv-04052 (“Water Out Action”) against Water Out Oregon and Water Out of
2
Oregon, Inc. (collectively “Water Out Oregon”) for infringement of the ‘812 Patent;
3
WHEREAS, Water Out Oregon filed a counterclaims in the Water Out Action
4
for a Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of the ‘812 Patent;
5
WHEREAS, Thermapure filed the action of Thermapure v. Just Right, Case
6
No: 11-cv-00431-RHW (E.D. Wash.), now consolidated as Case No. 2:13-cv-
7
08523-JVS-RZ (“Just Right Action”) for infringement of the ‘812 Patent (“Just
8
Right Action”);
9
WHEREAS, Just Right Cleaning and Construction, Inc. (“Just Right”) filed
10
counterclaims in the Just Right Action for a Declaratory Judgment of Non-
11
Infringement and Invalidity of the ‘812 Patent.
12
WHEREAS, the RIA, Thermapure, Water Out Oregon, and Just Right
13
(collectively the “Parties”) have entered into a Settlement Agreement
14
(“Agreement”) dated June 25, 2014;
15
16
17
WHEREAS, the Restoration Industry Association has stipulated and agreed
that the U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is valid.
WHEREAS, the Restoration Industry Association has stipulated and agreed to
18
a dismissal of its Third Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity
19
of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 with prejudice.
20
WHEREAS, Thermapure has covenanted and stipulated not to sue any RIA
21
Member in good standing for infringement of the ‘812 patent where that member
22
does not heat ambient air inside a structure to a temperature in excess of 105
23
degrees.
24
25
26
27
WHEREAS, Thermapure’s stipulation does not constitute an admission the
‘812 patent contains a temperature limitation.
WHEREAS, Thermapure, on behalf of itself, TPE Associates LLC, and ETherm, Inc., represents and warrants that it has the full authority to grant this
28
-2ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
covenant and that as of the date of this stipulation has not assigned the right to sue
2
for infringement of the ‘812 Patent.
3
WHEREAS, Water Out Oregon and Water Out of Oregon, Inc., have
4
represented and warranted that they have never heated ambient air inside a structure
5
to in excess of 105 degrees.
6
WHEREAS, although Thermapure contends that this is not a claim limitation,
7
subject to that representation being accurate, Thermapure agrees to a dismissal of its
8
Complaint against Water Out Oregon for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812
9
with prejudice.
10
WHEREAS, Water Out Oregon and Water Out Oregon, Inc. have stipulated
11
and agreed that the U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is valid and have stipulated and
12
agreed to a dismissal of counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment of Non-
13
Infringement and Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 with prejudice.
14
WHEREAS, Just Right Cleaning and Construction, Inc. has represented and
15
warranted that it has never heated ambient air inside a structure to in excess of 105
16
degrees.
17
WHEREAS, although Thermapure contends that this is not a claim limitation,
18
subject to the foregoing representation being accurate, Thermapure agrees to
19
dismissal of its Complaint against Just Right for Infringement of U.S. Patent No.
20
6,327,812 with prejudice.
21
WHEREAS, Just Right Cleaning and Construction, Inc. has stipulated and
22
agreed that the U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is valid and has stipulated and agreed to a
23
dismissal of counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and
24
Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 with prejudice.
25
26
WHEREAS, The Parties have stipulated that the Court retain jurisdiction to
enforce the terms of the Agreement.
27
28
-3ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
2
1.
The Restoration Industry Association’s Third Amended Complaint for
3
Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is dismissed with
4
prejudice.
5
2.
Subject to the accuracy of representation and warranty of Water Out
6
Oregon and Water Out Oregon, Inc., that they have never heated ambient air inside
7
a structure to in excess of 105 degrees, Thermapure’s Complaint against Water Out
8
Oregon for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is dismissed with prejudice.
9
3.
Water Out Oregon’s and Water Out of Oregon, Inc.’s counterclaims for
10
Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of U.S. Patent No.
11
6,327,812 are dismissed with prejudice.
12
4.
Subject to the accuracy of representation and warranty of Just Right
13
Cleaning and Construction Inc. that it has never heated ambient air inside a structure
14
to in excess of 105 degrees, Thermapure’s Complaint against Just Right for
15
Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is dismissed with prejudice.
16
5.
Just Right Cleaning and Construction, Inc.’s counterclaims for
17
Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of U.S. Patent No.
18
6,327,812 are dismissed with prejudice.
19
6.
20
the Agreement.
The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of
21
22
23
24
DATED: July 08, 2014
_________________________________
The Hon. James V. Selna
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
-4ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?