Restoration Industry Association Inc. v. ThermaPure, Inc.

Filing 126

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge James V. Selna re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 125 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (nbo)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KNEAFSEY & FRIEND LLP Sean M. Kneafsey (SBN 180863) skneafsey@kneafseyfriend.com 800 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 710 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel: (213) 892-1200 Fax: (213) 892-1208 Attorney for Thermapure, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 13 RESOTRATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 v. THERMAPURE, INC, Case No. 2:13-cv-03169-JVS-RZ Consolidated with 2:13−cv−04052−JVS−RZ and 2:13cv-08523-JVS-RZ ORDER OF DISMISSAL Defendant. 18 19 JS-6 AND RELATED ACTIONS Date: July 28, 2014 Time; 1:30 p.m. Courtroom No.: 10C 20 21 WHEREAS, the Restoration Industry Association, Inc., (“RIA”) filed the 22 action of Restoration Industry Association, Inc. v. Thermapure Inc., Case No. 2:13- 23 cv-01369 JVS (RZx) asserting in its Third Amended Complaint a cause of action 24 seeking a Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 (the 25 “‘812 Patent”) contending that the ‘812 Patent is invalid and unenforceable. 26 WHEREAS, Thermapure filed the action of Thermapure v. Water Out 27 Oregon, Case No: 11-cv-05958-BHS (W.D. Wash.), now consolidated as Case No. 28 -1ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 2:13-cv-04052 (“Water Out Action”) against Water Out Oregon and Water Out of 2 Oregon, Inc. (collectively “Water Out Oregon”) for infringement of the ‘812 Patent; 3 WHEREAS, Water Out Oregon filed a counterclaims in the Water Out Action 4 for a Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of the ‘812 Patent; 5 WHEREAS, Thermapure filed the action of Thermapure v. Just Right, Case 6 No: 11-cv-00431-RHW (E.D. Wash.), now consolidated as Case No. 2:13-cv- 7 08523-JVS-RZ (“Just Right Action”) for infringement of the ‘812 Patent (“Just 8 Right Action”); 9 WHEREAS, Just Right Cleaning and Construction, Inc. (“Just Right”) filed 10 counterclaims in the Just Right Action for a Declaratory Judgment of Non- 11 Infringement and Invalidity of the ‘812 Patent. 12 WHEREAS, the RIA, Thermapure, Water Out Oregon, and Just Right 13 (collectively the “Parties”) have entered into a Settlement Agreement 14 (“Agreement”) dated June 25, 2014; 15 16 17 WHEREAS, the Restoration Industry Association has stipulated and agreed that the U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is valid. WHEREAS, the Restoration Industry Association has stipulated and agreed to 18 a dismissal of its Third Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity 19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 with prejudice. 20 WHEREAS, Thermapure has covenanted and stipulated not to sue any RIA 21 Member in good standing for infringement of the ‘812 patent where that member 22 does not heat ambient air inside a structure to a temperature in excess of 105 23 degrees. 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, Thermapure’s stipulation does not constitute an admission the ‘812 patent contains a temperature limitation. WHEREAS, Thermapure, on behalf of itself, TPE Associates LLC, and ETherm, Inc., represents and warrants that it has the full authority to grant this 28 -2ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 covenant and that as of the date of this stipulation has not assigned the right to sue 2 for infringement of the ‘812 Patent. 3 WHEREAS, Water Out Oregon and Water Out of Oregon, Inc., have 4 represented and warranted that they have never heated ambient air inside a structure 5 to in excess of 105 degrees. 6 WHEREAS, although Thermapure contends that this is not a claim limitation, 7 subject to that representation being accurate, Thermapure agrees to a dismissal of its 8 Complaint against Water Out Oregon for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 9 with prejudice. 10 WHEREAS, Water Out Oregon and Water Out Oregon, Inc. have stipulated 11 and agreed that the U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is valid and have stipulated and 12 agreed to a dismissal of counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment of Non- 13 Infringement and Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 with prejudice. 14 WHEREAS, Just Right Cleaning and Construction, Inc. has represented and 15 warranted that it has never heated ambient air inside a structure to in excess of 105 16 degrees. 17 WHEREAS, although Thermapure contends that this is not a claim limitation, 18 subject to the foregoing representation being accurate, Thermapure agrees to 19 dismissal of its Complaint against Just Right for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 20 6,327,812 with prejudice. 21 WHEREAS, Just Right Cleaning and Construction, Inc. has stipulated and 22 agreed that the U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is valid and has stipulated and agreed to a 23 dismissal of counterclaims for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and 24 Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 with prejudice. 25 26 WHEREAS, The Parties have stipulated that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Agreement. 27 28 -3ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 2 1. The Restoration Industry Association’s Third Amended Complaint for 3 Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is dismissed with 4 prejudice. 5 2. Subject to the accuracy of representation and warranty of Water Out 6 Oregon and Water Out Oregon, Inc., that they have never heated ambient air inside 7 a structure to in excess of 105 degrees, Thermapure’s Complaint against Water Out 8 Oregon for Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is dismissed with prejudice. 9 3. Water Out Oregon’s and Water Out of Oregon, Inc.’s counterclaims for 10 Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 11 6,327,812 are dismissed with prejudice. 12 4. Subject to the accuracy of representation and warranty of Just Right 13 Cleaning and Construction Inc. that it has never heated ambient air inside a structure 14 to in excess of 105 degrees, Thermapure’s Complaint against Just Right for 15 Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,327,812 is dismissed with prejudice. 16 5. Just Right Cleaning and Construction, Inc.’s counterclaims for 17 Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 18 6,327,812 are dismissed with prejudice. 19 6. 20 the Agreement. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of 21 22 23 24 DATED: July 08, 2014 _________________________________ The Hon. James V. Selna United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 -4ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?