Jordan Spint et al v. Swarovski North America Limited et al

Filing 37

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Manuel L. Real. The Court finds, adjudges, and orders as follows: 1. That the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. 2. This action shall be remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court. 3. That the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' request for monetary sanctions. (mailed 8/13/13) Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal CV 103) (lom)

Jordan Spint et al v. Swarovski North America Limited et al

Doc. 37

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

JORDAN SPINT, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated;
and MICHEL PATRICIAN,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

14
v.

15
16
17
18
19

CASE NO. CV13-3265-R (MANx)
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO REMAND
Date: 8/12/13
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Dept.: Courtroom 8
Judge: Hon. Manuel L. Real

SWAROVSKI NORTH AMERICA
LIMITED, a California corporation;
SWAROVSKI RETAIL VENTURES
LTD., a California corporation;
SWAROVSKI CRYSTALLIZED LLC,
a California limited liability company;
and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

///
///
///
///
///
///
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Dockets.Justia.com

1

TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL:

2

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand came on regularly for hearing upon notice on

3

August 12, 2013, in Courtroom 8 of the above-entitled court, located at 312 North

4

Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Joseph Tojarieh, Esq. and Edwin Saghian,

5

Esq. appeared for Plaintiffs. Helene Wasserman, Esq. appeared for Defendants.

6

The Court, having reviewed and considered all papers in support of and in

7

opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand and oral argument of counsel having been

8

received by the Court, the Court finds, adjudges, and orders as follows:

9

1.

That the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion to Remand.

10

2.

This action shall be remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court.

11

3.

That the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for monetary sanctions.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED

14
15
16
17
18
19

Dated: August 13, 2013
By:

_________________________________
Hon. Manuel L. Real
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER