Richard Amavisca v. Foss Maritime Company et al
Filing
102
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This action was tried to a jury during the period December 25, 2014, before the undersigned judge. On 12/5/2014, the jury returned the Verdict Form (Docket No. 97 ). By virtue of and based upon the findings of t he jury set forth in the Verdict Form, Judgment is hereby entered in favor of RICHARD AMAVISCA and against Defendant FOSS MARITIME COMPANY in the amount of $426,150.00. Plaintiff shall further recover costs as allowed by Rule 54(d)(1) of the FRCP and post-judgment interest as allowed by 28 USC section 1961. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD AMAVISCA,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
FOSS MARITIME COMPANY,
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 13-3550 FMO (RZx)
JUDGMENT
17
This action was tried to a jury during the period December 2–5, 2014, before the
18
undersigned judge. On December 5, 2014, the jury returned the Verdict Form (Docket No. 97).
19
By virtue of and based upon the findings of the jury set forth in the Verdict Form, Judgment is
20
hereby entered in favor of RICHARD AMAVISCA and against Defendant FOSS MARITIME
21
COMPANY in the amount of Four-Hundred and Twenty-Six Thousand and One-Hundred and Fifty
22
Dollars ($426,150.00).
23
Plaintiff shall further recover costs as allowed by Rule 54(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil
24
Procedure and post-judgment interest as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
25
Dated this 10th day of December, 2014.
26
27
28
/s/
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?