Jorge Avila v. City of Santa Monica et al

Filing 25

SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ; ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLY by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi re Stipulation for Protective Order 23 . (See Order for details) [Note Chnages Made By The Court] (bem)

Download PDF
MARSHA JONES MOUTRIE, City Attorney CAROL ANN ROHR, Deputy City Attorney Bar No. 90012 carol.rohr@smgov.net 1685 Main Street, Room 310 Santa Monica, California 90401 Telephone: (310) 458-8335 Facsimile: (310) 451-5862 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SANTA MONiCA SCOTT MATSUDA, GEORGE MENDEZ, SCOTT McGOWAN and MARILYN AMIACHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JORGE AVILA, Plaintiff, 12 Honorable Otis D. Wright, II 13 14 15 CASE NO.: CV 13-03570-ODW (JCGX) CITY OF SANTA MONICA SCOTT MATSUDA GEORGE MEI1DEZ SCOTT McGOWAt1, MARILYN AMIACIJE and Does 1-10, inclusive FPROPOSIBt ORDER ON SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff JORGE AVILA, and defendants CITY OF SANTA MONICA, SCOTT MATSUDA, GEORGE MENDEZ, SCOTT McGOWAN and MARILYN AMIACHE, have stipulated and agreed to a SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER now before this Court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) to govern the disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL information described therein, precluding publication and limiting the use of said documents and information which defendants maintain ontain confidential and privileged information. After due consideration of the SECOND STIPULTED PROTECTIVE ORDER ;ubmitted by the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court rules as Follows: PROPOSED ORDER ON SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER.DOC The terms and couditions ftheSECOND STIPULTED PROTECTIVE 1 5 /7’V/64" / /’ 2 h ORDER snail govern t>thscIosure of the set forth therein. IT IS SO ORDERED 3 4 5 Dated: Honb1United States Magistrate Judge Ja9. Gandhi 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER ON SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER.DOC CaseT 2 3 4 MARSHA JONES MOUTRIE, City Attorney CAROL ANN ROHR, Deputy City Attorney Bar No. 90012 caro1.rohrsmgov.net 1685 Main St Room 310 reet, Santa Monica, California 90401 Telephone: (310) 458-8335 Facsimile: (310) 451-5862 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SANTA MONICA, SCOTT MATSUDA, GEORGE MENDEZ, SCOTT McGOWAN and MARILYN AMIACHE 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JORGE AVILA, Plaintiff 12 13 14 15 CASE NO.: CV 13-03570-ODW (JCGX) Honorable Otis D. Wright, II kv CITY OF SANTA MONICA, SCOTT SECOND STIPULATED MATSUDA GEORGE MENDEZ SCOTT PROTECTIVE ORDER McGOWAW, MARILYN AMIACI-{E and [PROPOS1D] ORDER THEREON Does 1-10, inclusive FILED CONCURRENTLY 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff JORGE AVILA, and defendants CITY OF SANTA MONICA, 21 SCOTT MATSUDA, GEORGE MENDEZ, SCOTT McGOWAN and MARILYN 22 AMIACHE, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 23 The defendants and/or plaintiff will disclose documents and/or discovery 24 requests have or will be served that require Defendants and/or plaintiff to disclose 25 confidential information. The following procedures shall be employed and the terms, 26 conditions, and restrictions shall govern with respect to all applicable documents 27 disclosed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) and discovery propounded by any party to this 28 case, including all summaries, copies, abstracts, extracts and/or other documents pertaining to this case and the information contained therein which shall be designated SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLYDOC Case’1 as CONFIDENTIAL, as well as any summaries, copies, abstracts, extracts and/or 2 other documents derived in whole or in part from the material designated as 3 CONFIDENTIAL (hereinafter "Confidential Material"): 4 (a) Any party or other person producing information in this case may, in 5 good faith, designate information as CONFIDENTIAL. Confidential Material is any 6 information produced in connection with this litigation that the producing party 7 reasonably believes is information that has not been, and should not be, made public, 8 and includes, but not limited to, confidential, private, medical or proprietary 9 information, the disclosure of which would constitute either (1) an invasion of the 10 privacy of any party or non-party to this action; (2) a potential for harm to the Santa 11 Monica Police Department’s internal investigatory system; and/or (3) a potential for 12 harm to significant governmental interests. At the time of production or other 13 disclosure of such CONFIDENTIAL information, the producing party or other person 14 shall designate such material by placing the word or words CONFIDENTIAL or 15 "Confidential Material subject to Protective Order" on each such document or other 16 material, or if it is not possible to do so label the material, by means of such other 17 designation as will identify the CONFIDENTIAL information with sufficient 18 specificity to permit counsel to adhere to the provisions of this Protective Order. 19 (b) The designation of information as CONFIDENTIAL shall not be 20 considered conclusive or binding on any party, and such designation may be contested 21 by noticed motion .atantime. However, unless and until an order of this Court sets 22 aside a designation of CONFIDENTIAL, all documents and information so designated’ 23 shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL, pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order. If 24 any party who receives CONFIDENTIAL information is served with a subpoena or 25 other request seeking documents containing CONFIDENTIAL information, he/she 26 shall immediately give written notice to counsel for the party that disclosed the 27 CONFIDENTIAL information, identifying the CONFIDENTIAL information sought 28 and the time in which production or other disclosure is required, and shall object to the SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; (PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLY.DOC CasEV’ 1 request or subpoena on the grounds of this Order so as to afford the party that 2 disclosed the CONFIDENTIAL information an opportunity to obtain an Order barring 3 production or other disclosure, or to otherwise respond to the subpoena or other 4 request for production or disclosure of documents containing CONFIDENTIAL 5 information. In no event should production or disclosure be made without written 6 approval by the party that disclosed the CONFIDENTIAL information unless required 7 by Court order, of which the party disclosing the CONFIDENTIAL information has 8 been given prior notice, arising from a motion to compel production or disclosure of 9 documents containing CONFIDENTIAL information. 10 (c) Any CONFIDENTIAL information that is produced pursuant to this 11 Stipulation may be produced only to counsel of record for the parties in this litigation. 12 Counsel for any party who obtains any CONFIDENTIAL information from any other 13 party shall protect it and its contents from all disclosure to anyone save the persons 14 designated in this paragraph. CONFIDENTIAL material and information derived 15 from CONFIDENTIAL material shall be used only as reasonably necessary for 16 preparation of mediation briefs, arbitration briefs and/or trial of this action, including 17 use at depositions and in support of motions as further set forth in this Stipulation, 18 and, including any appeal or retrial, and shall not be used for any other purpose, 19 including, without limitation, any other litigation or proceeding, or any business, or 20 governmental purpose or function. Copies of the records deemed CONFIDENTIAL 21 may be used at the time of trial only if so ordered by the Court, or agreed to between 22 the parties. Additionally, reference to the content of any CONFIDENTIAL records or 23 the existence of any such record shall only be made after so ordered by the Court, or 24 agreed to between the parties. Counsel of record may disclose CONFIDENTIAL 25 information where necessary to the proper preparation for, and trial of, this case to: 26 (i) 27 as contract staff 28 their employees, including paralegal, clerical and secretarial staff, as well (ii) experts and consultants retained only for the purpose of aiding counsel of SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLY.DOC record in connection with counsel’s preparation for trial, including the use at depositions, and in support of motions and Rule 26 Declarations; (iii) individuals testifying under oath at deposition in this action’; (iv) a party, or officer, director or employee of a party to this action, deemed necessary by counsel to aid in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action; (v) the Court and members of its staff, including stenographic and other I reporters; or (vi) court reporters employed by counsel in this action. 10 (d) Each person identified in subparagraphs (i) through (vi) above, excluding 11 the Court and its staff, shall, before s/he receives CONFIDENTIAL information, be 12 provided by the person furnishing him with such information a copy of this order and 13 agree in writing to be bound by its terms, and shall certify that s/he has carefully read 14 the order and fully understands its terms. Such person also must consent in writing to 15 be subject to the jurisdiction of this court with respect to any proceeding relating to 16 enforcement of this order. An agreement incorporating these terms shall be prepared 17 and agreed to by the parties and executed by the person before receiving the 18 CONFIDENTIAL information. The executed agreement shall be made a part of the 19 deposition transcript when it is executed by a deponent. 20 (e) Whenever any CONFIDENTIAL information is introduced or used at a 21 deposition, those portions of the deposition that concern CONFIDENTIAL 22 information (i) shall be conducted in such a way that only persons authorized by the 23 24 25 26 27 28 In the event a party intends to question a deponent at deposition about CONFIDENTIAL Material, the party noticing the Deposition shall include a statement of such intent in the Notice of Deposition and shall describe the CONFIDENTIAL Material to be disclosed to the deponent at the deposition in sufficient time for the opposing party to seek a protective order. If the non-noticing party desires to question a deponent at deposition about CONFIDENTIAL Material, that party must advise the noticing party of such intent, and shall describe the CONFIDENTIAL Material to be disclosed to the deponent at the deposition in sufficient time for the noticing party to seek a protective order. The parties shall meet and confer in good faith in an effort to resolve all disputes regarding CONFIDENTIAL Material in an effort to avoid the necessity for Court intervention. SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDERTHEREON PILED CONCURRENTLY.DOC Case Protective Order to have access to such matters are present; and (ii) shall be separately 2 bound after transcription and marked as CONFIDENTIAL, and then shall be deemed 3 to be subject to the terms of the Protective Order. For convenience, if a deposition 4 transcript contains repeated references to CONFIDENTIAL material that cannot 5 conveniently be segregated from non-CONFIDENTIAL material, any party may 6 request that the entire transcript or exhibits be maintained by the reporter as 7 CONFIDENTIAL. 8 9 (f) If a party wishes to file with the court documents which contain information designated as CONFIDENTIAL, that party shall notify the party 10 disclosing the CONFIDENTIAL information, in writing, via personal delivery and/or 11 fax, at least 10 court days prior to filing any pleadings, motions, briefs, declarations, 12 stipulations, exhibits or other written submissions (collectively "papers") with this 13 Court, which contain, reflect, incorporate or refer to CONFIDENTIAL 14 INFORMATION, in order to allow the party disclosing the CONFIDENTIAL 15 16 information, to make a written application to seal the subject material. Pending a rf,*e,f1e’ 5,Mc/ ruling on the application, the "papers" are to be filed Qensisent with Local Rule 79 17 5.1. The-ia4i 19 20 any (g) Failure of counsel to designate testimony or exhibits as ONFIDENTIAL at deposition shall not constitute a waiver of the confidentiality of 21 he testimony or exhibits. Upon receipt of the transcript of the deposition, counsel 22 ;hall be entitled to designate specific pages and lines of the transcript or exhibits as 23 24 25 26 ONFIDENTIAL; however, any other party shall be entitled to treat the transcript or xhibits as non-CONFIDENTIAL material until such time as the CONFIDENTIAL Jesignation is made. (h) Discovering counsel may show CONFIDENTIAL material to a deponent 27 it a deposition and examine that deponent concerning same, subject to the provisions 28 )fparagraph(c)(iii). Examining counsel will, at the outset of the deposition, inquire as SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON PILED CONCURRENTLYDOC CaseI 1 I to whether the deponent agrees to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order. If 2 the deponent does not agree, the CONFIDENTIAL material shall not be disclosed to 3 the deponent. If the deponent agrees to be bound by the terms of the Protective Order 4 and executes the agreement referred to in I (d) above, the reporter shall be instructed 5 to give the deponent written notice when the transcript has been prepared, stating that 6 the deponent may inspect the transcript and its exhibits, including the 7 CONFIDENTIAL material, in the reporter’s office. If the original deposition 8 transcript is not signed within thirty (30) days after the date of the notice, it will be 9 used as if it is signed. The deponent shall not be furnished with a copy of the portions 10 of the deposition transcript or exhibits that have been designated as CONFIDENTIAL. 11 Alternatively, counsel for the parties who have executed this Protective Order, or their 12 authorized representatives, may make other arrangements for the review and signing 13 of a deposition in this matter that uphold the stipulations herein and protect the 14 confidentiality of the CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL provided pursuant to this 15 Protective Order. Furthermore, any audiotape and/or videotape of any such deposition 16 shall be subject to this Order. 17 (i) If any CONFIDENTIAL material is provided to a discovering party 18 without being marked as CONFIDENTIAL, the failure to mark the material shall not 19 be deemed a waiver of its confidentiality. Until the material is designated as 20 CONFIDENTIAL by the producing party, however, the discovering party shall be 21 entitled to treat the material as non-CONFIDENTIAL. Upon designation, such 22 material shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with the provisions of this 23 Protective Order. 24 (j) This Stipulation for Protective Order shall survive the final termination of 25 this action, to the extent that the information contained in CONFIDENTIAL Material 26 is not or does not become known to the public, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction 27 to resolve any dispute concerning the use of information disclosed hereunder. Within 28 1 thirty (3 0) days after the final settlement or conclusion of this action, discovering SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLY.DOC I counsel shall return to producing counsel all CONFIDENTIAL documents including, 2 without limitation, depositions and trial, hearing, or other transcripts containing 3 information designated as CONFIDENTIAL, as well as all copies, and shall return or 4 destroy any extracts, summaries, or material derived from the information. 4a. 5 addition, the parties agree to cooperate in o 6 documents, transcri ,exliibits-anzrany other materials containing information 7 1 designat igoiirtIiºiii of this Court all NFIDENTIAL that have been filed with this Court and securing their .Jfl 9 (k) This Stipulation for Protective Order is entered solely for the purpose of 10 facilitating the exchange of documents and information between the parties to this 11 action without involving the Court unnecessarily in the process. Nothing in this Order 12 nor the production of any information or document under the terms of this Order nor 13 any proceedings pursuant to this Order shall be deemed to have the effect of an 14 admission or waiver by either party or of altering the confidentiality or non- 15 confidentiality of any such document or information or altering any existing 16 obligation of any party of the absence thereof. Further, nothing in this Order shall 17 constitute a waiver by any party of any applicable privilege or other protection, nor 18 shall this Order or the production of the documents in question be construed so as to 19 make any document or other material described herein admissible in any proceeding 20 before this or any other court. Nothing in this Order shall prejudice any parties’ rights 21 to object to the introduction of any CONFIDENTIAL information into evidence, on 22 grounds, including, but not limited to, relevance and privilege. 23 24 or other pre-trial proceedings in this Court ichId-enthilt discussion or 25 disclosure of CON 26 presence fli-intlividuals, including the jury, except for those individuals indicated in flUrcmcts, be heard by the Court outside the 27 28 SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; (PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLYDOC - 1 2 ( - II. STATEMENT OF GOOD CAUSE (m) Pursuant to the [proposed] protective order herein, defendant, the City of Santa Monica, ("DISCLOSING PARTY") contends that the below listed confidential material related to underlying incident of April 6, 2012 , involving the arrest of plaintiff, which plaintiff seeks, is subject to various protections, including, but not 6 limited to, Governmental Privilege, the Official Information Privilege, and also the privilege of critical self-examination/analysis and/or the deliberative process privilege, Evidence Code § § 1040, et seq., Penal Code § § 146e, 832.5, 832.7, 832.8, and 9 Government Code § § 3300, et seq. and 6254. Further, such material also contains private and confidential information including private and confidential third-party information. 12 (n) Such CONFIDENTIAL material kept by DISCLOSING PARTY are governmental documents that contain official information. Such CONFIDENTIAL material has been maintained by the DISCLOSING PARTY in confidence and 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 contains sensitive and private information. (o) The DISCLOSING PARTY is extremely concerned that dissemination of subject information, documents, and materials related to the incident, relevant personnel, and other confidential internal investigations could compromise the efficacy of such undertakings in the future and act to discourage cooperation from the public. Further, disclosure of which without a protective order may compromise the safety of the subject peace officers and their families and third parties. (p) In light of the aforementioned facts, and given the strong public policies in favor of encouraging witnesses to cooperate in investigations, protecting those who :: assist in investigations, protecting society’s interests in investigating such incidents, it is necessary and proper to enter into an order carefully limiting the use and 26 27 28 dissemination of the information, documents, and materials that are the subject of this Stipulation. In order to informally resolve this matter, the Parties have agreed to this stipulated protective order. SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; [PROPOSED) ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLY.DOC I III. THE CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS (q) This Order, based upon the assertions and stipulations herein, shall apply to protect from unauthorized disclosure the following CONFIDENTIAL information, 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 which will be provided to plaintiff as CONFIDENTIAL material after the parties have executed the instant Stipulated Protective Order and the Court has thereafter signed the [Proposed] Order thereon. 1. Recorded LA interview of Jorge Avila (1) 2. Recorded I.A. interview of Officer Marilyn Amiache 3. Recorded I.A. interview of Officer George Mendez 4. Recorded I.A. interview of Witness Louis Emile 5. Recorded I.A. interview of Officer Blake Cooper 6. Recorded I.A. interview of Officer Russ Grimmond 13 14 Recorded I.A. interview of Officer James Weese 8. 15 16 17 18 Recorded I.A. interview of Officer Scott McGowan Recorded I.A. interview of Jorge Avila (2) 10. Recorded I.A. interview of Officer Scott Matsuda (r) This Stipulation for Protective Order is entered into without prejudice to the right of any party to waive the applicability of this Stipulation for Protective Order as to any information produced by the party. Upon the application to this Court by noticed motion, any party may: 21 22 (i) seek additional protective treatment for any information or documents that might become the subject of discovery; (ii) object to the designation of any document as CONFIDENTIAL; or 25 26 27 28 (iii) seek any modification of, or relief from, this Protective Order and such other relief as may seem appropriate. Prior to any such application, counsel shall confer to try to obtain agreement without resort to the intervention of the Court. (s) Attorneys of the parties receiving CONFIDENTIAL documents/information shall not cause or knowingly permit disclosure of the contents SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLY.DOC Case I 1 of the CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS beyond the disclosure permitted under the 2 terms and conditions of this Stipulation. 3 (t) No document covered by this Stipulation may be used for any purpose 4 not set forth herein, or revealed to any person not described herein, absent further 5 order of this Court. 6 (u) This Stipulation shall survive the termination of this action, and the Court 7 retains jurisdiction to resolve any dispute concerning the disclosure or use of the 8 CONFIDENTIAL material disclosed pursuant to this Stipulation. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 10 11 DATED: January 16, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO 12 /s/Kaveh Navab By:_________________________ KAVEH NAVAB 13 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff JORGE AVILA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DATED: January 16, 2014 MARSHA JONES MOUTRIE City Attorney Al Carol Ann Rohr By: CAROL ANN ROHR Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF SANTA MONICA. et al.. 26 27 28 10 SECOND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON FILED CONCURRENTLY.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?