Little i Inc v. World Packaging Corp.

Filing 19

CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Defendant is permanently enjoined from the manufacture, importation, distribution,sale, offer for sale, or use of Defendant's Mirrored Tins or Plaintiff's Patent, or t ins in the same dimensions as Plaintiff's Mirrored Tins (as those terms are defined in Plaintiff's Complaint), subject to the terms of the parties' settlement agreement. Defendant is permanently enjoined from the use or registration of the term MIRROR MINT TIN, or any trademark substantially similar to Plaintiff's MIRROR MINTS trademark. Each party will bear its own costs and expenses in connection with this action. Except as otherwise provided in this judgment, this action is dismissed with prejudice. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lom)

1
2
3
4

Evan A. Raynes, State Bar No. 164447
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Symbus Law Group, LLC
1425 K Street, N.W., Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20005

5
6

Counsel for Plaintiff
LITTLE I, INC.

JS-6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION

8
9
10
11

Little i, Inc.,
Plaintiff,

12

Civil Action No. CV-13-03639-ODW (FFMx)
13
14

v.
World Packaging Corp.,

CONSENT JUDGMENT AND
DISMISSAL OF ACTION

15

Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant on May 21, 2013 alleging
patent and trademark infringement;
WHEREAS, the Court extended the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint
until August 23, 2013 (ECF No. 17); and
WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement of their dispute and stipulate to the
following Consent Judgment and Dismissal of Action;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Court enters the following Consent Judgment and Dismissal of
Action:

26
27
28

1

1

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action and the parties to this action, and will

2

have exclusive jurisdiction over any action for breach of this judgment or to

3

enforce this judgment.

4

2. Defendant is permanently enjoined from the manufacture, importation, distribution,

5

sale, offer for sale, or use of Defendant’s Mirrored Tins or Plaintiff’s Patent, or tins

6

in the same dimensions as Plaintiff’s Mirrored Tins (as those terms are defined in

7

Plaintiff’s Complaint), subject to the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement.

8

3. Defendant is permanently enjoined from the use or registration of the term

9

MIRROR MINT TIN, or any trademark substantially similar to Plaintiff’s

10

MIRROR MINTS trademark (as those terms are defined in Plaintiff’s Complaint).

11

4. Defendant acknowledges that Plaintiff’s Patent and Plaintiff’s Registration (as

12

those terms are defined in Plaintiff’s Complaint) are valid and enforceable.

13

5. This judgment is binding upon and inures to the benefit of the Parties and their

14

respective parent, subsidiary, and affiliated companies, and each of their

15

shareholders, members, directors, officers, employees, agents, successors, and

16

assigns.

17

6. Each party will bear its own costs and expenses in connection with this action.

18

7. Except as otherwise provided in this judgment, this action is dismissed with

19
20
21
22

prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 26, 2013
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28

2