Deborah Worthing Webb v. William Calvin Webb et al

Filing 9

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: To date, plaintiff has not responded to the Court's order, and there is no basis for federal jurisdictional apparent from the face of plaintiff's complaint. Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bp)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

JS-6

Case No.

CV 13-3647 CAS (PJWx)

Title

DEBORAH WORTHING WEBB V. WILLIAM ALVIN WEBB, ET AL.

Present: The Honorable

Date

June 11, 2013

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

Catherine Jeang
Deputy Clerk

Not Present
Court Reporter / Recorder

N/A
Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(In Chambers:) ORDER DISMISSING CASE

On May 21, 2013, plaintiff Deborah Worthing Webb, proceeding pro se, filed the
instant complaint against defendants William Calvin Webb, California Reconveyance,
Chase Bank, Coldwell Banker, Patrick De Carlos, Equity Title, Sandra S. Polin, West
Coast Escrow. Dkt. No. 1.
On May 22, 2013, the Court denied plaintiff’s request for temporary injunctive
relief, in the form of a temporary restraining order against her spouse, defendant William
Webb. Dkt. No. 5. The Court further ordered plaintiff to show cause within fourteen
days why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Id.
To date, plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order, and there is no basis for
federal jurisdiction apparent from the face of plaintiff’s complaint. Accordingly, the
Court hereby DISMISSES this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
00
Initials of Preparer

:

00

CMJ

1

The Court DENIES defendant William Webb’s “Response and Request for
Dismissal,” Dkt. No. 6, as moot.
CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1