NetAirus Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc

Filing 105

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court hereby enters final judgment in favor of Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") on Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies, LLC's ("NetAirus'S") claims for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,103,380 (the "'380 Patent") and Apple's counterclaims for non-infringement and invalidity of the '380 Patent. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that each of NetAirus's claims is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Apple is the prevailing party in this matter and is entitled to seek costs pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54(d)(1). IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION

9
10
11
12

NETAIRUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
a California limited liability company,

13
14

Plaintiff,

Case No.: 2:13-cv-03780-JAK-E
FINAL JUDGMENT
JS-6

vs.

15
16

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Defendant.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2:13-cv-03780-JAK-E FINAL JUDGMENT

FINAL JUDGMENT

1
2

The Court hereby enters final judgment in favor of Defendant Apple Inc.

3

(“Apple”) on Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies, LLC’s (“NetAirus’s”) claims for

4

infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,103,380 (the “’380 Patent”) and Apple’s

5

counterclaims for non-infringement and invalidity of the ’380 Patent.

6
7

It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that each of
NetAirus’s claims is dismissed with prejudice.

8

It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Apple is the

9

prevailing party in this matter and is entitled to seek costs pursuant to F.R.C.P.

10

54(d)(1).

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14
15

Dated: April 12, 2016
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-22:13-cv-03780-JAK-E FINAL JUDGMENT