Morris Reese v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al

Filing 52

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 49 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:All of the summary-judgment motions in the Reese Cases will be noticed for hearing on Monday, April 14, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. All briefing shall comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Central District of California's Local Rules, and all scheduling and case management orders issued by this Court. Plaintiff may file a single opposition to all of the motions, if he so chooses but the page limitations set forth by this Court and the Local Rules still apply. (lc). Modified on 3/12/2014. (lc).

Download PDF
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court Central District of California 8 9 10 11 MORRIS REESE, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 2:13-cv-3811-ODW(PLAx) v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [49] 16 17 18 Before the Court is Defendant Sprint Nextel Corporation’s Request for Leave to 19 File Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 49.) The proposed motion for 20 summary judgment would be based solely on the affirmative defense of laches. This 21 case is part of the related Reese Cases before this Court. Similar Requests have been 22 made and granted in all of the other Reese Cases. The Court finds that a motion for 23 summary judgment on the issue of laches is proper in this case as well. Accordingly, 24 the Court GRANTS Sprint’s Request for Leave to File Motion for Summary 25 Judgment. (ECF No. 49.) 26 All of the summary-judgment motions in the Reese Cases will be noticed for 27 hearing on Monday, April 14, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. All briefing shall comply with the 28 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Central District of California’s Local Rules, and 1 all scheduling and case management orders issued by this Court. Plaintiff may file a 2 single opposition to all of the motions, if he so chooses—but the page limitations set 3 forth by this Court and the Local Rules still apply. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 March 11, 2014 8 9 10 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?