Anthony Teresi v. Tom Bohl et al

Filing 37

JUDGMENT OP DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. AND MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. Judgment of dismissal is entered in favor of defendants Chase and MERS, who are dismissed from this action with prejudice, and against Plaintiff.2. Chase and MERS may file a bill of costs. RE: 30 (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) (lw)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

S. CHRISTOPHER YOO (CA Bar No. 169442)
[e-mail]
MARIEL A. GERLT (CA Bar No. 251119)
[e-mail]
ALVARADOSMITH
A Professional Corporation
1 MacArthur Place, Suite 200
Santa Ana, California 92707
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

E-FILED 10/8/13

Attorneys for Defendants
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. erroneously sued
separately as JP MORGAN, CHASE BANK, N.A., and
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC., erroneously sued as MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

A LVARADO S MITH
A P ROFESSIONAL C ORPORATI ON
S ANT A A NA

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

ANTHONY TERESI,
Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19
20

CASE NO.: CV13-3950 PSG (SHx)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS
TO DFENDANTS JPMORGAN
CHASE BANK N.A. AND
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.

v.
TOM BOHL, an Attorney, MICHAEL
and MELINDA JENSEN, MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, JP MORGAN, CHASE
BANK, N.A., OLD REPUBLIC
DEFAULT MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, JUDGE PHILIP S.
GUTIERRIZ ,

21

ACTION FILED: June 3, 2013

Defendants.

22
23
24
25

Pursuant to the September 5, 2013 order of the Court, requiring plaintiff

26

Anthony Teresi (“Plaintiff”) to show cause by September 23, 2013, why his

27

Complaint should not be dismissed on the ground that it is barred by res judicata

28

(CV13-3950 Dkt. #27), and having considered the reply by Plaintiff, and good cause
1

3693862.1 -- AL109.F6

1

appearing, on October 2, 2013, the Court dismissed this action, with prejudice, as to

2

Defendants JMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., erroneously separately sued as JP Morgan,

3

Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.,

4

erroneously sued as Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (“MERS” and

5

collectively “Defendants”)1.

6

Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

7

1.

8

Judgment of dismissal is entered in favor of defendants Chase and

MERS, who are dismissed from this action with prejudice, and against Plaintiff.

9

2. Chase and MERS may file a bill of costs.

10

A LVARADO S MITH
A P ROFESSIONAL C ORPORATI ON
S ANT A A NA

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

DATED:

10/08/13

By:
Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

Defendants Old Republic Default Management and Tom Bohl were also dismissed.
2

3693862.1 -- AL109.F6