Raymond Smith v. British Petroleum et al

Filing 35

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. King, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 34 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
Heather McMillan (SBN 188939) Email: heather@scmclaw.com 2 Daniel P. Stevens (SBN 164277) STEVENS & McMILLAN 3 335 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 4 Tel.: (714) 730-1000 Fax: (714) 730-1067 1 5 6 FILED: 11/13/13 Attorneys for Plaintiff RAYMOND SMITH Simon L. Yang Email: syang@seyfarth.com 8 Seyfarth Shaw LLP 333 S.Hope St, Ste 3900 9 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel.: (213) 270-9600 10 Fax: (213) 270-9601 7 11 Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT FOR CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 RAYMOND SMITH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, ) INC., and DOES 1 through 50, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) _______________________________) Case No.: CV 13-4075 GHK (AGRx) (LASC No. BC 501164 Action Filed: December 20, 2012 ORDER [PROPOSED] DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER 23 24 Pursuant to the Stipulation entered into by and between Plaintiff RAYMOND 25 SMITH and Defendant BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA, INC. through their 26 respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefore, 27 /// 28 /// 1 [Proposed] Order to Dismiss Entire Action with Prejudice 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter of Raymond Smith vs. BP Products 2 North America, Inc. filed in the United States District Court for the Central District 3 of California, bearing Case Number CV 13-4075 GHK (AGRx) is hereby dismissed 4 with prejudice in its entirety. 5 6 7 DATED: 11/12/13 ___________________________________ HONORABLE GEORGE H. KING Chief United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order to Dismiss Entire Action with Prejudice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?