Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Gregory Dean Ward

Filing 25

JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, in favor of Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fu nd, Trustees of the National IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Sout hern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan against Gregory Dean Ward in the principal amount of $11,554.02, interest in the amount of $428.83, attorneys fees of $8,911.00, costs of $744.00 for a total judgment of $14,261.92. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

JS-6

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA PENSION
PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEWNECA HEALTH TRUST FUND,
TRUSTEES OF THE LOS ANGELES
COUNTY ELECTRICAL
EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING
TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEWNECA LABOR-MANAGEMENT
COOPERATION COMMITTEE,
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL
IBEW-NECA LABOR- MANAGEMENT
COOPERATION COMMITTEE,
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL
ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND,
CONTRACT COMPLIANCE FUND,
AND LOS ANGELES ELECTRICAL
WORKERS CREDIT UNION,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiffs,
vs.
GREGORY DEAN WARD, an individual
doing business as “TEMPE ELECTRIC,”
Defendant.

) CASE NO. CV 13-04093 MMM (MRWx)
)
)
)
) JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFFS
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1

On December 20, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion for the entry of default judgment

2

against defendant Gregory Dean Ward, dba Tempe Electric. On June 25, 2014, the court entered

3

an order granting the motion. Accordingly,

4

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

5
6

1. That plaintiffs recover from defendant $11.554.02 in unpaid contributions, $428.83 in

7

prejudgment interest, $2,099.07 in liquidated damages, and $180.00 in audit fees, or a total of

8

$14,261.92;

9

2. That plaintiffs recover $8,911.00 in attorneys’ fees; and

10

3. That plaintiffs recover $744.00 in costs;

11

4. That the judgment bear post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.10%; and

12

5. That the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed.

13
14

DATED: June 25, 2014

MARGARET M. MORROW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2