Daniel Rodriguez v. Louis Milusnic

Filing 15

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (ad)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,
vs.

Petitioner,

LOUIS MILUSNIC, Warden,
Respondent.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV 13-4148-DDP (DTB)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records

18 and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
19 Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having
20 made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation
21 to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings,
22 conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
23

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition

24 and dismissing this action with prejudice.
25
26

DATED: July 28, 2014

27

DEAN D. PREGERSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1