Len Dell'Amico v. Rhino Entertainment Company et al

Filing 24

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real: THIS MATTER IS SET ON CALENDAR FOR HEARING ON FEBRUARY 28, 2014 AT 10:00 A.M. FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON THE REMAINING INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS. PRESENCE OF COUNSEL AT THE HEARING IS MANDATORY; FAILURE TO ATTEND WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION. (wh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL Case No: 2:13−cv−04313−R−AJW Date: 2/20/2014 Title: LEN DELL'AMICO V. RHINO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY ET AL PRESENT: HONORABLE MANUEL L. REAL, JUDGE William Horrell Deputy Clerk N/A Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: Not Present Not Present PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution THIS MATTER IS SET ON CALENDAR FOR A HEARING ON February 28, 2014 at 10:00 AM FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON THE DEFENDANTS. PRESENCE OF THE PARTIES AT THE HEARING IS MANDATORY; FAILURE TO ATTEND WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION. cc: counsel of record MINUTES FORM II CIVIL − GEN Initials of Deputy Clerk: wh

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?