Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 144

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiffs Good Morning to You Productions Corp, Majar Productions LLC, Rupa Marya, Robert Siegel, served on 08/11/2014. (Attachments: # 1 service list)(Manifold, Betsy)

1 FRANCIS M. GREGOREK (144785)
[e-mail]
2 BETSY C. MANIFOLD (182450)
[e-mail]
3 RACHELE R. RICKERT (190634)
[e-mail]
4 MARISA C. LIVESAY (223247)
[e-mail]
5 WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
6 750 B Street, Suite 2770
San Diego, CA 92101
7 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 619/234-4599
8
9 Interim Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the [Proposed] Class
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -

12

WESTERN DIVISION

13
14

GOOD MORNING TO YOU
PRODUCTIONS CORP., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

15
16

v.

17
18

WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC,
INC., et al.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx)
DECLARATION OF BETSY C.
MANIFOLD RE PROOF OF SERVICE
OF PLAINTIFFS’ [UNREDACTED]
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION
FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE WILNER’S ORDER RE:
DISCOVERY MOTION DENYING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
OVERRULE DEFENDANTS’ CLAIM
OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE;
AND [UNREDACTED] DECLARATION
OF MARK C. RIFKIN IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REVIEW

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

I, Betsy C. Manifold, the undersigned, hereby declare as follows:
1.

That I am an attorney, duly licensed to practice law in the states of

Wisconsin, New York, and California, and am a partner with the law firm of Wolf
Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, interim lead counsel for Plaintiffs Good
Morning To You Productions Corp., Robert Siegel, Rupa Marya, and Majar
Productions, LLC. I have personal knowledge of the following facts and if called
upon to testify as to them, I could, and would, competently do so.
2.

That on August 11, 2014, I served the following documents on opposing

10 counsel at their respective electronic mailboxes as stated on the attached Service List:
PLAINTIFFS’APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PLAINTIFFS’
11
12

[UNREDACTED] NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR

13

REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILNER’S ORDER RE:

14

DISCOVERY MOTION DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO

15

OVERRULE DEFENDANTS’ CLAIM OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT

16

PRIVILEGE AND [UNREDACTED] DECLARATION OF MARK C.

17

RIFKIN IN SUPPORT THEREOF;

18

[UNREDACTED]

19

MOTION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILNER’S

20

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY MOTION DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

21

MOTION TO OVERRULE DEFENDANTS’ CLAIM OF ATTORNEY-

22

CLIENT PRIVILEGE; and

23

[UNREDACTED] DECLARATION OF MARK C. RIFKIN IN

24
25
26
27
28

SUPPORT

OF

PLAINTIFFS’

PLAINTIFFS’

NOTICE

MOTION

OF

FOR

MOTION

REVIEW

AND

OF

MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILNER’S ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
MOTION DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO OVERRULE
DEFENDANTS’ CLAIM OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
3.

That there is regular communication between the parties.

-1-

1
2

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 11th day of August 2014, at San Diego, California.

3

/s/Betsy C. Manifold
BETSY C. MANIFOLD

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

WARNER/CHAPPELL 21079

24
25
26
27
28
-2-