Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 190

AMENDED JOINT EVIDENTIARY APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF CROSS-MOTIONS AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED PURSUANT TO COURTS DEC. 5, 2014 ORDER [Dkt. 185] (VOLUME 4, EXS. 55-81, PAGES 707-947) re Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Declaratory Judgment 179 filed by Plaintiffs Good Morning to You Productions Corp, Majar Productions LLC, Rupa Marya, Robert Siegel. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix (Volume 4, Exs. 55-64), # 2 Appendix (Volume 4, Exs. 64-77), # 3 Appendix (Volume 4, Exs. 77-81))(Manifold, Betsy)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 55 Ex. 55 707 Ex. 55 708 Ex. 55 709 Ex. 55 710 Ex. 55 711 Ex. 55 712 Ex. 55 713 Ex. 55 714 Ex. 55 715 Ex. 55 716 Ex. 55 717 Ex. 55 718 EXHIBIT 56 Ex. 56 719 Ex. 56 720 Ex. 56 721 Ex. 56 722 Ex. 56 723 Ex. 56 724 Ex. 56 725 Ex. 56 726 Ex. 56 727 Ex. 56 728 Ex. 56 729 Ex. 56 730 EXHIBIT 57 Ex. 57 731 Ex. 57 732 Ex. 57 733 Ex. 57 734 Ex. 57 735 Ex. 57 736 Ex. 57 737 Ex. 57 738 Ex. 57 739 Ex. 57 740 EXHIBIT 58 Ex. 58 741 Ex. 58 742 P004319 EXHIBIT 59 Ex. 59 743 Ex. 59 744 Ex. 59 745 Ex. 59 746 Ex. 59 747 Ex. 59 748 EXHIBIT 60 Ex. 60 749 Ex. 60 750 Ex. 60 751 Ex. 60 752 Ex. 60 753 Ex. 60 754 Ex. 60 755 EXHIBIT 61 [ORIGINAL EXHIBIT MANUALLY LODGED & FILED PURSUANT TO L.R. 11-5.4] [Copy of Original Exhibit Attached] 756 757 758 EXHIBIT 62 Ex. 62 759 Ex. 62 760 Ex. 62 761 Ex. 62 762 EXHIBIT 63 Ex. 63 763 Ex. 63 764 Ex. 63 765 EXHIBIT 64 Ex. 64 766 In The Matter Of: GOOD MORNING TO YOU PRODUCTIONS CORP. v. WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC. SACHS, Ph.D., JOEL - Vol. 1 September 9, 2014 MERRILL CORPORATION LegaLink, Inc. 20750 Ventura Boulevard Suite 205 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Phone: 818.593.2300 Fax: 818.593.2301 Ex. 64 767 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION -----------------------------------x GOOD MORNING TO YOU PRODUCTIONS CORP.; et al., -againstWARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, et al., Plaintiffs, Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK INC., Defendants. -----------------------------------x September 9, 2014 9:32 a.m. Videotaped Deposition of JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. taken by Defendants, pursuant to Notice, at the offices of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, before William Visconti, a Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public within and for the State of New York. Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 768 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 2 1 2 3 4 A P PEA RAN C E S: WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff 270 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016 BY: MARK C. RIFKIN, ESQ. rifkin@whafh.com 5 6 7 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP Attorneys for Defendants 560 Mission Street San Francisco, California 94105-2907 8 BY: 9 10 MELINDA LE MOINE, ESQ. melinda.lemoine@mto.com ADAM I. KAPLAN, ESQ. adam.kaplan@mto.com 11 12 13 14 ALSO PRESENT: WILLIAM PACE, VIDEOGRAPHER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 769 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 3 E X H I BIT S 1 2 DESCRIPTION 3 (Sachs Exhibit 45 for 4 identification, Deposition Notice 5 for Professor Sachs.) 6 (Sachs Exhibit 46 for 7 identification, letter from 8 Mr. Rifkin to Professor Sachs.) 9 (Sachs Exhibit 47 for PAGE 10 (Sachs Exhibit 48 for 13 identification, CV of Professor 14 Sachs dated November, 2012.) 15 (Sachs Exhibit 49 for 16 identification, Binder.) 17 (Sachs Exhibit 50 for 18 identification, document.) 19 (Sachs Exhibit 51 for 20 identification, document.) 21 (Sachs Exhibit 52 for 22 identification, document reflecting 23 Irving Berlin's Pretty Girl Is Like 24 45 Professor Sachs.) 12 43 identification, Expert report of 11 14 A Melody.) 45 74 110 140 142 25 Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 770 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 4 E X H I BIT S 1 2 3 (Sachs Exhibit 53 for 4 identification, document.) 5 (Sachs Exhibit 54 for 6 identification, document.) 7 (Sachs Exhibit 55 for 8 identification, document.) 9 (Sachs Exhibit 56 for PAGE DESCRIPTION 10 (Sachs Exhibit 57 for 12 226 267 272 identification, document.) 11 144 identification, document.) 275 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 771 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED 1 2 by and between the attorneys for the 3 respective parties herein that filing and 4 sealing be and the same are hereby waived. 5 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED 6 that all objections, except as to the form 7 of the question, 8 time of the trial. shall be reserved to the IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED 9 10 that the within deposition may be signed 11 and sworn to before any officer authorized 12 to administer an oath with the same force and 13 effect as if signed and sworn to before the 14 Court. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 772 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 6 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: 1 This is the 09:32:34 2 video operator speaking, William Pace, for 09:32:38 3 Merrill Court Reporting of Los Angeles. 09:32:42 4 is September 9th, 2014 and the time is 9:32 09:32:47 5 a.m. 09:32:51 6 Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, 1285 Avenue Of 09:32:52 7 The Americas, New York, New York to take the 09:32:57 8 video deposition of Joel Sachs in the matter of 09:32:59 9 Good Morning To You Productions, et al., versus 09:33:02 10 Warner/Chappell Music Inc. et al. 09:33:04 11 United States District Court, Central District 09:33:07 12 of California Western Division. 09:33:10 13 1304460. Today We are at the offices of Paul, Weiss, In the Case number CV 09:33:13 14 Will counsel please identify 09:33:14 15 yourselves and state whom you represent. 09:33:17 16 MS. LE MOINE: Melinda LeMoine and 09:33:19 17 Adam Kaplan on behalf of Warner/Chappell from 09:33:20 18 Munger, Tolles & Olson. 09:33:23 19 MR. RIFKIN: Marc Rifkin, Wolf 20 Haldenstein on behalf of the Plaintiffs. 21 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The court 09:33:25 09:33:26 09:33:28 22 reporter today is Bill Visconti for Merrill 09:33:30 23 Court Reporting of Los Angeles, and you may 09:33:32 24 swear in the witness. 25 Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 773 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 80 We see evidence and we try to 1 2 decide what it means. 3 things but sometimes it seems so clear what it 11:02:23 4 means that you sort of accept it. 11:02:26 5 don't have the absolute proof of it. 6 not alive in 1901 so we don't immediately know 11:02:32 7 that someone sang Happy Birthday. 11:02:35 8 certainly suggests very strongly that they did. 9 Q. It could mean various 11: 02: 17 You know you We are But this So the absence of the additional 11: 02: 2 0 11:02:30 11:02:37 11:02:41 10 lyrics suggests to you that the lyrics were 11:02:42 11 well known? 11:02:44 12 A. That people knew the words. 11:02:55 13 Q. You didn't survey materials other 11:02:57 14 than what Mr. Rifkin provided you to confirm 11:02:58 15 that belief? 11:03:01 16 A. Frankly it probably would have taken 11:03:05 17 me a couple of years to locate the materials if 11:03:07 18 they even exist. 11:03:09 19 20 Q. This could be unique. That is not my question. My question is you did not? 11:03:10 11: 03: 12 21 A. 22 could do that. 11:03:19 23 Q. 11:03:24 I did not. I did not feel that I Do you know whether Clayton F. 24 Summy authorized the publication of Good 25 11:03:12 Morning To You lyrics in the Inland Educator Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 774 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 81 11:03:28 1 Journal here? 2 A. I have no idea. 11:03:30 3 Q. Do you have any idea whether 11:03:33 4 Clayton F. Summy knew that the lyrics were 11:03:34 5 reprinted in this book? 11:03:36 7 10 There is no evidence based on what I have. 11:03:37 11:03:39 How about the Hill sisters, do you Q. 8 9 I don't know. A. 6 11:03:43 have any evidence that they knew this was 11:03:45 printed in the Inland Educator Journal? 11:03:47 11 There is no evidence. A. Since they 11:03:51 12 were both educators and apparently very dedicated 11:03:54 13 educators, 11:03:54 14 that they read this journal. 15 16 Q. I think there is a reasonable possibility But you don't have any evidence of 11:03:56 11:03:56 11:03:57 that? 17 A. I don't have any evidence of that. 11:04:01 18 Q. Do you have any evidence that they 11:04:04 19 authorized the reprinting of the lyrics in this 11:04:04 20 journal? 11:04:05 21 A. Neither that they did or they 22 didn't. But if they authorized the reprint of 23 the Good Morning To You, why would they not 24 have wanted them also to print Happy Birthday 25 11:04:09 To You to be sure that people knew those words. Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm 11:04:10 11:04:14 Ex. 64 775 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 82 1 That was the question that I asked myself. 2 3 Q. You don't know whether they authorized 11:04:20 11:04:20 11:04:21 4 A. I don't, no. 11:04:23 5 Q. Do you have a opinion either way as 11:04:25 6 to whether they authorized this printing of 11:04:26 7 Good Morning To You in this journal? 11:04:28 A. 8 9 I don't. There is no way to form an opinion based on what is here. 11:04:41 11:04:42 10 Q. Look at paragraph 18. 11:04:43 11 A. 18 did you say? 11: 04: 52 12 Q. Yes, 11:04:54 sir. Paragraph 18 some of 13 these questions are going to be the same but I 11:04:56 14 want to make sure that your testimony is the 11:04:56 15 same. 11:04:56 16 A. Right. 11:04:59 17 Q. This is with regard to material 11: 05: 02 18 called "Tell Me A True Story Tales Of Bible 11:05:04 19 Heros For The Children Of To-day" which 11:05:10 20 includes a birthday service. 11:05:14 21 here and that is at tab C; correct? Again, we have 11:05:14 22 A. That's right. 11:05:16 23 Q. If we look at tab C? 11:05:18 24 A. Page 250. 25 Q. Page 250 the last line says "Sing Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 776 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 89 1 2 Q. I said C. I'm still at Tell Me A True Story. 11:11:32 11: 11: 32 3 A. Okay. 11:11:36 4 Q. Do you have any knowledge of 11:11:39 5 whether the Clayton F. Summy Corporation 11:11:46 6 authorized the reprinting of Good-Bye To You? 11:11:47 7 A. There is no evidence in this. 11:11:48 8 Q. Do you have any evidence that the 11:11:51 9 10 Hill sisters authorized the reprinting of 11:11:53 Good-Bye To You? 11:11:54 11 A. There is no evidence. 11:11:58 12 Q. How about whether they knew that it 11:11:59 13 was reprinted in this book? 11:12:00 14 A. There is no evidence. 11: 12: 02 15 Q. That is true for both the Hill 11: 12: 04 16 17 sisters and the Summy Corporation; correct? A. Based on what we have in front of 11:12:19 18 us there is no evidence of any of that. 19 sorry to just continue that. 20 probability exists that as admired apparently 11:12:32 21 and busy educators that this is the kind of 11:12:36 22 volume that they probably would have seen and 11:12:40 23 they might have gotten very angry. 11:12:42 24 possible that they did authorize it. 25 Q. However, 11:12:06 I think the same So it is 11:12:25 11:12:29 Do you have any basis for that Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 777 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 90 1 11:12:47 statement? it is just the inference 11:12:50 3 that it seems to be intended for teachers and 11:12:54 4 they were teachers and lots of teachers who are 11:12:57 5 very diligent would keep up on the journals 11:12:59 6 about teaching and try to be abreast of what is 11:13:01 7 going on. 8 saw it. 2 A. Q. 9 10 No. No, So I think it is possible that they 11:13:01 11:13:03 Do you have any evidence that they 11:13:03 11:13:04 saw it? 11 A. No. 11:13:07 12 Q. Are you opining today that they did 11:13:07 13 11:13:09 see it? 14 A. I'm opining that they may have seen I would not say they did see it because I 11:13:12 11:13:13 15 it. 16 don't know. 17 It is the kind of thing that might have crossed 11:13:19 18 their vision. 11:13:21 19 Q. I think they might have seen it. 11:13:16 What are you relying on for that 11:13:22 20 statement other than the fact that they were 11:13:23 21 teachers? 11:13:24 22 23 24 25 A. That is all and that this is intended for teachers. Q. 11:13:26 11:13:29 Did you read any biographies of the Hill sisters in preparation of your report? Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 778 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 91 1 A. No, I haven't. 2 Q. Have you done any study of what the 11:13:38 11:13:40 3 Hill sisters did or how they prepared or what 11:13:41 4 kind of things they read at all? 11:13:43 5 6 A. No, I only know the fact that they were educators that had a very good reputation. 11:13:46 11:13:47 7 Q. How do you know that? 11:13:51 8 A. Marc probably informed me of that 11:13:54 9 11:13:57 and it seemed like a reasonable supposition 11:13:58 10 since he seemed to have done his research. 11 could have duplicated the research, but I think 11:14:00 12 the main point was that I knew they were 11:14:02 13 educators and that was the market. 11:14:04 14 Q. I The only fact that you're relying 11:14:06 15 on to conclude that they may have seen this is 11:14:06 16 something that you learned from Mr. Rifkin; is 11:14:11 17 that correct? 11:14:12 18 A. The only thing that led me to this 11:14:15 19 conclusion is that I knew they were educators. 11:14:17 20 That I did know. 11:14:20 21 didn't see any elaborate biography and didn't 11:14:22 22 after that. 11:14:27 23 composer and a writer pair who were educators. I looked them up. But I I just needed to know they were 24 And since I know many educators who 25 11:14:30 routinely read all the journals, it seems to me Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 779 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 92 1 2 possible that they did the same. Q. Because you know today that 11:14:37 11:14:40 3 educators read journals you're concluding that 11:14:42 4 it is possible that the Hill sisters read this 11:14:44 5 journal in the early 20th century? 11:14:46 6 7 A. No, I know that educators in the late 19th early 20th century also read journals. 11:14:52 11:14:52 8 Q. How do you know that? 11:14:55 9 A. From my research into Henry Cowell 11:14:56 10 11 12 and his mother. Q. But again, 11:14:57 just to be clear, you don't have any evidence, this is speculation? 11:14:59 11:15:07 13 A. This is purely speculation. 11:15:19 14 Q. Go to paragraph 19 which refers to 11:15:33 15 Exhibit D or tab D of Exhibit 47, correct? 11:15:36 16 This is an excerpt from something called 11:15:38 17 Program For Beginners' Department? 11:15:38 18 A. Yes. 11:15:41 19 Q. This does include the lyrics to 11:15:42 20 Happy Birthday as we understand them. 11:15:43 21 A. That's right. 11:15:45 22 Q. And you say that that leads you to 11:15:51 23 conclude that the words were widely known at 24 that time, 25 A. 11:15:51 correct? It leads me to conclude that they Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 780 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 105 1 and the Clayton F. Summy Company since, as Marc 11:28:59 2 pointed out, we don't actually know whether the 11:29:01 3 words to Happy Birthday To You were included in 11:29:03 4 the volume that referred to Song Stories For 11:29:06 5 The Sunday School. 11:29:07 We simply don't know that; 11:29:10 But something in the text of this 6 11:29:13 7 program for the Beginner's Department I 8 clearly provoked the publisher of it to make 11:29:16 9 contact with Summy because Summy is referred to 11:29:17 here. 11:29:18 10 11 12 13 Q. think Song Stories For The Sunday School 11:29:20 11:29:21 is referred to here in note 2? A. Song Stories For The Sunday School 14 and Clayton F. Summy is given as the publisher. 15 11:29:25 No, it isn't actually. 11:29:26 11:29:27 16 Q. It isn't? 17 A. It isn't, 18 Q. So let's try again. 11:29:27 yes. 11:29:30 Do you have 11:29:33 19 any evidence -- let's start very generally. 11:29:37 20 You pointed me to the note and I want to start -- I'm 11:29:39 21 taking it from the top, very general. 11:29:39 22 A. Okay. 11:29:41 23 Q. Are you aware of any evidence that 11:29:43 24 the Clayton F. Summy Co. authorized the 25 printing of the lyrics to Happy Birthday To You Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 781 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 106 1 in Program For Beginners' Department? 11:29:48 2 A. No. 11:29:50 3 Q. Are you aware of any evidence that 11:29:55 4 the Hill sisters authorized printing of Happy 11:29:57 5 Birthday To You in Program For Beginners' 11:29:57 6 Department? 11:29:57 7 A. No. 11:29:59 8 Q. Are you aware of any evidence that 11:30:03 they are even aware of the printing of Happy 11:30:05 10 Birthday To You in this volume, either the Hill 11:30:07 11 sisters or the Clayton F. Summy Co.? 11:30:08 9 12 A. There is no direct evidence of 11:30:08 13 that. To that I might add, however, that the 11:30:17 14 confusion in my mind about Song Stories came 11:30:21 15 from Exhibit A which is Song Stories For The 11:30:22 16 Kindergarten Published by Clayton F. Summy 11:30:24 17 Corporation which strikes me as probably 11:30:32 18 related to Song Stories For The Sunday School 11:30:35 19 because the title is the same. 11:30:37 20 So it strongly suggests that it is 11:30:40 21 Clayton F. Summy Company who is referred to in 11:30:43 22 footnote 2. 11:30:46 23 Birthday is in the collection Song Stories. 24 25 Q. But it does not imply that Happy Nor does it imply, does it, 11:30:49 that Clayton F. Summy Co. authorized the printing of Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 782 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 107 1 Happy Birthday To You in this volume; is that 11:30:54 2 right? 11:30:56 A. 3 No, it does imply that Clayton F. 11:30:59 4 Summy may have authorized the publication of 11:31:01 5 something in this volume, but it doesn't refer 11:31:02 6 specifically to Happy Birthday To You. 11:31:04 Q. 7 So just to be totally clear, you're 11:31:08 8 not offering any opinion that this is an authorized 11:31:11 9 publication of Happy Birthday To You by Clayton 11:31:14 F. Summy Co. or by the Hill sisters; correct? 11:31:27 10 11 A. Not on the basis of any evidence. 11:31:29 12 Q. Let's talk about paragraph 20. 11:31:33 In 13 paragraph 20 and it is referring to tab E, 11:31:38 14 Exhibit E. 11:31:45 15 entitled "The 101 Best Songs For Home School 11:31:50 16 And Meeting." 11:31:59 17 no copyright date, correct? 18 this was published, tab E? A. 19 We are discussing a song book And you note that this print has Well, I don't. Do you know when 11: 32: 02 11:32:05 This was the first 11:32:08 20 of the compositions to provoke me to write 11: 32: 11 21 Nicholas Bell about the backwards based clef on 11:32:14 22 page 23. Because that struck me as a very old 11: 32: 17 23 form of musical notation that one almost never 11:32:21 24 sees. 25 in the Julliard Library that was published in And it happened that there was one song Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 783 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 122 experience. 2 because you don't want to draw conclusions 11:48:59 3 based on experience that might not prove to be 11:49:00 4 valid. 11:49:02 5 Q. You have to be careful about it 11:48:57 1 What I'm trying to define is what 11:49:04 6 is it about your experience that you're relying 11:49:06 7 on when you make some of these inferences? 11:49:07 8 A. Exactly, in this case it is from 11:49:10 looking at a lot of music that's comes out in 11:49:13 10 multiple editions and having some sense of the 11:49:15 11 time span they covered and therefore some sense 11:49:19 12 of perhaps a publisher's instinct about when it 11:49:21 13 is time to do a new edition. 11:49:27 9 You haven't done 11:49:30 15 any actual study of how frequent editions were 11:49:32 16 issued of music collections in the early 20th 11:49:33 17 century in America? 11:49:39 14 Q. Just to clarify. 18 A. That's correct. 11:49:46 19 Q. In tab E this Good Morning To You 11:49:51 20 printing referred to as number 23 it says under 11:49:54 21 that Good-Bye To You, Happy Birthday To You, my 11:49:56 22 questions are going to be similar to those that 11:49:58 23 we already covered. 11:50:00 24 25 Do you have any evidence that the Clayton F. Summy Co. was aware of this edition Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 784 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 123 1 11:50:08 of the printing of Good Morning To You? 2 A. There is no evidence of that. 11:50:13 3 Q. How about the Hill sisters, do you 11:50:15 4 have any evidence that they knew about this 11:50:17 5 version of Good Morning To You and Happy 11:50:17 6 Birthday To You? 11:50:19 A. 7 There is no evidence of that. And 11:50:23 8 if I may add there is no evidence that they 11:50:23 9 wrote the thing. 11:50:24 10 11 Q. A. 11:50:25 11:50:28 wrote what? 12 13 There is no evidence that they Good Morning To You. Number 23 in 11:50:29 11:50:38 that publication. 14 Q. What about tab A? 11:50:40 15 A. That is the one that we talked 11:50:44 16 about before. 17 composing and arranging and Patty Hill with 11:50:49 18 writing and adapting. 11:50:53 19 only of Good Morning To You which we know is by 11:50:54 20 them. 11:50:56 21 Q. Where it credits Mildred J. Hill And that is a publication Why would you say the song Good 11:50:46 11:50:57 22 Morning To You there is no evidence that they 11:50:58 23 wrote the thing? 11:51:01 MR. RIFKIN: 24 25 A. He said in tab E. In tab E there is no evidence that Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 785 JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014 Page 126 1 song there that only occupied two staves, but 11:53:30 2 he didn't or she didn't do that. 11: 53: 32 Again, it implied to me that people 3 11:53:36 4 knew what the words of Happy Birthday were, 11:53:38 5 they didn't have to be printed. 11:53:43 6 one might say the reasons why Good Morning To 11:53:45 7 You is printed is because that was copyrighted, 11:53:46 8 we know that. 11:53:48 9 Q. And perhaps You said you don't have any 11:53:52 10 evidence that this is authorized or they knew 11:53:52 11 about it? 11:53:55 12 A. No, but the implication is whoever 11:53:59 13 put this together felt that there was no need 14 to put the words of Happy Birthday in there. I 11:54:04 15 think one can go on to say that since the words 11:54:09 16 of Good Morning To You are in there, Good 11:54:10 17 Morning To All along with the music, whether 11:54:14 18 this is a pirated edition, whoever put it 11:54:16 19 together seems to have respected the 11:54:19 20 association of those two which were 11:54:22 21 copyrighted. 11:54:22 22 association in mind between the Happy Birthday 11:54:25 23 words and anything else, but that so many 11:54:27 24 people knew them that there was no point in 25 fiddling around with the layout of this page in 11:54:01 And it may be that there was no Merrill Corporation 800-826-0277 www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm Ex. 64 786

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?