Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc
Filing
190
AMENDED JOINT EVIDENTIARY APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF CROSS-MOTIONS AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED PURSUANT TO COURTS DEC. 5, 2014 ORDER [Dkt. 185] (VOLUME 4, EXS. 55-81, PAGES 707-947) re Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Declaratory Judgment 179 filed by Plaintiffs Good Morning to You Productions Corp, Majar Productions LLC, Rupa Marya, Robert Siegel. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix (Volume 4, Exs. 55-64), # 2 Appendix (Volume 4, Exs. 64-77), # 3 Appendix (Volume 4, Exs. 77-81))(Manifold, Betsy)
EXHIBIT 55
Ex. 55
707
Ex. 55
708
Ex. 55
709
Ex. 55
710
Ex. 55
711
Ex. 55
712
Ex. 55
713
Ex. 55
714
Ex. 55
715
Ex. 55
716
Ex. 55
717
Ex. 55
718
EXHIBIT 56
Ex. 56
719
Ex. 56
720
Ex. 56
721
Ex. 56
722
Ex. 56
723
Ex. 56
724
Ex. 56
725
Ex. 56
726
Ex. 56
727
Ex. 56
728
Ex. 56
729
Ex. 56
730
EXHIBIT 57
Ex. 57
731
Ex. 57
732
Ex. 57
733
Ex. 57
734
Ex. 57
735
Ex. 57
736
Ex. 57
737
Ex. 57
738
Ex. 57
739
Ex. 57
740
EXHIBIT 58
Ex. 58
741
Ex. 58
742
P004319
EXHIBIT 59
Ex. 59
743
Ex. 59
744
Ex. 59
745
Ex. 59
746
Ex. 59
747
Ex. 59
748
EXHIBIT 60
Ex. 60
749
Ex. 60
750
Ex. 60
751
Ex. 60
752
Ex. 60
753
Ex. 60
754
Ex. 60
755
EXHIBIT 61 [ORIGINAL EXHIBIT MANUALLY LODGED
& FILED PURSUANT TO L.R. 11-5.4]
[Copy of Original Exhibit Attached]
756
757
758
EXHIBIT 62
Ex. 62
759
Ex. 62
760
Ex. 62
761
Ex. 62
762
EXHIBIT 63
Ex. 63
763
Ex. 63
764
Ex. 63
765
EXHIBIT 64
Ex. 64
766
In The Matter Of:
GOOD MORNING TO YOU PRODUCTIONS CORP.
v.
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC.
SACHS, Ph.D., JOEL - Vol. 1
September 9, 2014
MERRILL CORPORATION
LegaLink, Inc.
20750 Ventura Boulevard
Suite 205
Woodland Hills, CA 91364
Phone: 818.593.2300
Fax: 818.593.2301
Ex. 64
767
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
-----------------------------------x
GOOD MORNING TO YOU PRODUCTIONS
CORP.; et al.,
-againstWARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Lead Case No.
CV 13-04460-GHK
INC.,
Defendants.
-----------------------------------x
September 9, 2014
9:32 a.m.
Videotaped Deposition of JOEL SACHS, Ph.D.
taken by Defendants, pursuant to Notice, at the
offices of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton &
Garrison, 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New
York, New York, before William Visconti, a
Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public within and
for the State of New York.
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
768
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 2
1
2
3
4
A P PEA RAN C E S:
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
270 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
BY:
MARK C. RIFKIN, ESQ.
rifkin@whafh.com
5
6
7
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
560 Mission Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2907
8
BY:
9
10
MELINDA LE MOINE, ESQ.
melinda.lemoine@mto.com
ADAM I. KAPLAN, ESQ.
adam.kaplan@mto.com
11
12
13
14
ALSO PRESENT:
WILLIAM PACE, VIDEOGRAPHER
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
769
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 3
E X H I BIT S
1
2
DESCRIPTION
3
(Sachs Exhibit 45 for
4
identification, Deposition Notice
5
for Professor Sachs.)
6
(Sachs Exhibit 46 for
7
identification, letter from
8
Mr. Rifkin to Professor Sachs.)
9
(Sachs Exhibit 47 for
PAGE
10
(Sachs Exhibit 48 for
13
identification, CV of Professor
14
Sachs dated November, 2012.)
15
(Sachs Exhibit 49 for
16
identification, Binder.)
17
(Sachs Exhibit 50 for
18
identification, document.)
19
(Sachs Exhibit 51 for
20
identification, document.)
21
(Sachs Exhibit 52 for
22
identification, document reflecting
23
Irving Berlin's Pretty Girl Is Like
24
45
Professor Sachs.)
12
43
identification, Expert report of
11
14
A Melody.)
45
74
110
140
142
25
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
770
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 4
E X H I BIT S
1
2
3
(Sachs Exhibit 53 for
4
identification, document.)
5
(Sachs Exhibit 54 for
6
identification, document.)
7
(Sachs Exhibit 55 for
8
identification, document.)
9
(Sachs Exhibit 56 for
PAGE
DESCRIPTION
10
(Sachs Exhibit 57 for
12
226
267
272
identification, document.)
11
144
identification, document.)
275
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
771
JOEL SACHS,
Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 5
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED
1
2
by and between the attorneys for the
3
respective parties herein that filing and
4
sealing be and the same are hereby waived.
5
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED
6
that all objections, except as to the form
7
of the question,
8
time of the trial.
shall be reserved to the
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED
9
10
that the within deposition may be signed
11
and sworn to before any officer authorized
12
to administer an oath with the same force and
13
effect as if signed and sworn to before the
14
Court.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
772
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 6
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
1
This is the
09:32:34
2
video operator speaking, William Pace, for
09:32:38
3
Merrill Court Reporting of Los Angeles.
09:32:42
4
is September 9th, 2014 and the time is 9:32
09:32:47
5
a.m.
09:32:51
6
Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, 1285 Avenue Of
09:32:52
7
The Americas, New York, New York to take the
09:32:57
8
video deposition of Joel Sachs in the matter of
09:32:59
9
Good Morning To You Productions, et al., versus
09:33:02
10
Warner/Chappell Music Inc. et al.
09:33:04
11
United States District Court, Central District
09:33:07
12
of California Western Division.
09:33:10
13
1304460.
Today
We are at the offices of Paul, Weiss,
In the
Case number CV
09:33:13
14
Will counsel please identify
09:33:14
15
yourselves and state whom you represent.
09:33:17
16
MS. LE MOINE:
Melinda LeMoine and
09:33:19
17
Adam Kaplan on behalf of Warner/Chappell from
09:33:20
18
Munger, Tolles & Olson.
09:33:23
19
MR. RIFKIN:
Marc Rifkin, Wolf
20
Haldenstein on behalf of the Plaintiffs.
21
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
The court
09:33:25
09:33:26
09:33:28
22
reporter today is Bill Visconti for Merrill
09:33:30
23
Court Reporting of Los Angeles, and you may
09:33:32
24
swear in the witness.
25
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
773
JOEL SACHS,
Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 80
We see evidence and we try to
1
2
decide what it means.
3
things but sometimes it seems so clear what it
11:02:23
4
means that you sort of accept it.
11:02:26
5
don't have the absolute proof of it.
6
not alive in 1901 so we don't immediately know
11:02:32
7
that someone sang Happy Birthday.
11:02:35
8
certainly suggests very strongly that they did.
9
Q.
It could mean various
11: 02: 17
You know you
We are
But this
So the absence of the additional
11: 02: 2 0
11:02:30
11:02:37
11:02:41
10
lyrics suggests to you that the lyrics were
11:02:42
11
well known?
11:02:44
12
A.
That people knew the words.
11:02:55
13
Q.
You didn't survey materials other
11:02:57
14
than what Mr. Rifkin provided you to confirm
11:02:58
15
that belief?
11:03:01
16
A.
Frankly it probably would have taken
11:03:05
17
me a couple of years to locate the materials if
11:03:07
18
they even exist.
11:03:09
19
20
Q.
This could be unique.
That is not my question.
My
question is you did not?
11:03:10
11: 03: 12
21
A.
22
could do that.
11:03:19
23
Q.
11:03:24
I did not.
I did not feel that I
Do you know whether Clayton F.
24
Summy authorized the publication of Good
25
11:03:12
Morning To You lyrics in the Inland Educator
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
774
JOEL SACHS,
Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 81
11:03:28
1
Journal here?
2
A.
I have no idea.
11:03:30
3
Q.
Do you have any idea whether
11:03:33
4
Clayton F. Summy knew that the lyrics were
11:03:34
5
reprinted in this book?
11:03:36
7
10
There is no evidence
based on what I have.
11:03:37
11:03:39
How about the Hill sisters, do you
Q.
8
9
I don't know.
A.
6
11:03:43
have any evidence that they knew this was
11:03:45
printed in the Inland Educator Journal?
11:03:47
11
There is no evidence.
A.
Since they
11:03:51
12
were both educators and apparently very dedicated
11:03:54
13
educators,
11:03:54
14
that they read this journal.
15
16
Q.
I think there is a reasonable possibility
But you don't have any evidence of
11:03:56
11:03:56
11:03:57
that?
17
A.
I don't have any evidence of that.
11:04:01
18
Q.
Do you have any evidence that they
11:04:04
19
authorized the reprinting of the lyrics in this
11:04:04
20
journal?
11:04:05
21
A.
Neither that they did or they
22
didn't.
But if they authorized the reprint of
23
the Good Morning To You, why would they not
24
have wanted them also to print Happy Birthday
25
11:04:09
To You to be sure that people knew those words.
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
11:04:10
11:04:14
Ex. 64
775
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 82
1
That was the question that I asked myself.
2
3
Q.
You don't know whether they
authorized
11:04:20
11:04:20
11:04:21
4
A.
I don't, no.
11:04:23
5
Q.
Do you have a opinion either way as
11:04:25
6
to whether they authorized this printing of
11:04:26
7
Good Morning To You in this journal?
11:04:28
A.
8
9
I don't.
There is no way to form
an opinion based on what is here.
11:04:41
11:04:42
10
Q.
Look at paragraph 18.
11:04:43
11
A.
18 did you say?
11: 04: 52
12
Q.
Yes,
11:04:54
sir.
Paragraph 18 some of
13
these questions are going to be the same but I
11:04:56
14
want to make sure that your testimony is the
11:04:56
15
same.
11:04:56
16
A.
Right.
11:04:59
17
Q.
This is with regard to material
11: 05: 02
18
called "Tell Me A True Story Tales Of Bible
11:05:04
19
Heros For The Children Of To-day" which
11:05:10
20
includes a birthday service.
11:05:14
21
here and that is at tab C; correct?
Again, we have
11:05:14
22
A.
That's right.
11:05:16
23
Q.
If we look at tab C?
11:05:18
24
A.
Page 250.
25
Q.
Page 250 the last line says "Sing
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
776
JOEL SACHS,
Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 89
1
2
Q.
I said C.
I'm still at Tell Me A
True Story.
11:11:32
11: 11: 32
3
A.
Okay.
11:11:36
4
Q.
Do you have any knowledge of
11:11:39
5
whether the Clayton F. Summy Corporation
11:11:46
6
authorized the reprinting of Good-Bye To You?
11:11:47
7
A.
There is no evidence in this.
11:11:48
8
Q.
Do you have any evidence that the
11:11:51
9
10
Hill sisters authorized the reprinting of
11:11:53
Good-Bye To You?
11:11:54
11
A.
There is no evidence.
11:11:58
12
Q.
How about whether they knew that it
11:11:59
13
was reprinted in this book?
11:12:00
14
A.
There is no evidence.
11: 12: 02
15
Q.
That is true for both the Hill
11: 12: 04
16
17
sisters and the Summy Corporation; correct?
A.
Based on what we have in front of
11:12:19
18
us there is no evidence of any of that.
19
sorry to just continue that.
20
probability exists that as admired apparently
11:12:32
21
and busy educators that this is the kind of
11:12:36
22
volume that they probably would have seen and
11:12:40
23
they might have gotten very angry.
11:12:42
24
possible that they did authorize it.
25
Q.
However,
11:12:06
I think the same
So it is
11:12:25
11:12:29
Do you have any basis for that
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
777
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 90
1
11:12:47
statement?
it is just the inference
11:12:50
3
that it seems to be intended for teachers and
11:12:54
4
they were teachers and lots of teachers who are
11:12:57
5
very diligent would keep up on the journals
11:12:59
6
about teaching and try to be abreast of what is
11:13:01
7
going on.
8
saw it.
2
A.
Q.
9
10
No.
No,
So I think it is possible that they
11:13:01
11:13:03
Do you have any evidence that they
11:13:03
11:13:04
saw it?
11
A.
No.
11:13:07
12
Q.
Are you opining today that they did
11:13:07
13
11:13:09
see it?
14
A.
I'm opining that they may have seen
I would not say they did see it because I
11:13:12
11:13:13
15
it.
16
don't know.
17
It is the kind of thing that might have crossed
11:13:19
18
their vision.
11:13:21
19
Q.
I think they might have seen it.
11:13:16
What are you relying on for that
11:13:22
20
statement other than the fact that they were
11:13:23
21
teachers?
11:13:24
22
23
24
25
A.
That is all and that this is
intended for teachers.
Q.
11:13:26
11:13:29
Did you read any biographies of the
Hill sisters in preparation of your report?
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
778
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 91
1
A.
No,
I haven't.
2
Q.
Have you done any study of what the
11:13:38
11:13:40
3
Hill sisters did or how they prepared or what
11:13:41
4
kind of things they read at all?
11:13:43
5
6
A.
No,
I only know the fact that they
were educators that had a very good reputation.
11:13:46
11:13:47
7
Q.
How do you know that?
11:13:51
8
A.
Marc probably informed me of that
11:13:54
9
11:13:57
and it seemed like a reasonable supposition
11:13:58
10
since he seemed to have done his research.
11
could have duplicated the research, but I think
11:14:00
12
the main point was that I knew they were
11:14:02
13
educators and that was the market.
11:14:04
14
Q.
I
The only fact that you're relying
11:14:06
15
on to conclude that they may have seen this is
11:14:06
16
something that you learned from Mr. Rifkin; is
11:14:11
17
that correct?
11:14:12
18
A.
The only thing that led me to this
11:14:15
19
conclusion is that I knew they were educators.
11:14:17
20
That I did know.
11:14:20
21
didn't see any elaborate biography and didn't
11:14:22
22
after that.
11:14:27
23
composer and a writer pair who were educators.
I looked them up.
But I
I just needed to know they were
24
And since I know many educators who
25
11:14:30
routinely read all the journals, it seems to me
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
779
JOEL SACHS,
Ph.D. -
9/9/2014
Page 92
1
2
possible that they did the same.
Q.
Because you know today that
11:14:37
11:14:40
3
educators read journals you're concluding that
11:14:42
4
it is possible that the Hill sisters read this
11:14:44
5
journal in the early 20th century?
11:14:46
6
7
A.
No,
I know that educators in the
late 19th early 20th century also read journals.
11:14:52
11:14:52
8
Q.
How do you know that?
11:14:55
9
A.
From my research into Henry Cowell
11:14:56
10
11
12
and his mother.
Q.
But again,
11:14:57
just to be clear, you
don't have any evidence, this is speculation?
11:14:59
11:15:07
13
A.
This is purely speculation.
11:15:19
14
Q.
Go to paragraph 19 which refers to
11:15:33
15
Exhibit D or tab D of Exhibit 47, correct?
11:15:36
16
This is an excerpt from something called
11:15:38
17
Program For Beginners' Department?
11:15:38
18
A.
Yes.
11:15:41
19
Q.
This does include the lyrics to
11:15:42
20
Happy Birthday as we understand them.
11:15:43
21
A.
That's right.
11:15:45
22
Q.
And you say that that leads you to
11:15:51
23
conclude that the words were widely known at
24
that time,
25
A.
11:15:51
correct?
It leads me to conclude that they
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
780
JOEL SACHS,
Ph.D. -
9/9/2014
Page 105
1
and the Clayton F. Summy Company since, as Marc
11:28:59
2
pointed out, we don't actually know whether the
11:29:01
3
words to Happy Birthday To You were included in
11:29:03
4
the volume that referred to Song Stories For
11:29:06
5
The Sunday School.
11:29:07
We simply don't know that;
11:29:10
But something in the text of this
6
11:29:13
7
program for the Beginner's Department I
8
clearly provoked the publisher of it to make
11:29:16
9
contact with Summy because Summy is referred to
11:29:17
here.
11:29:18
10
11
12
13
Q.
think
Song Stories For The Sunday School
11:29:20
11:29:21
is referred to here in note 2?
A.
Song Stories For The Sunday School
14
and Clayton F. Summy is given as the publisher.
15
11:29:25
No,
it isn't
actually.
11:29:26
11:29:27
16
Q.
It isn't?
17
A.
It isn't,
18
Q.
So let's try again.
11:29:27
yes.
11:29:30
Do you have
11:29:33
19
any evidence -- let's start very generally.
11:29:37
20
You pointed me to the note and I want to start -- I'm
11:29:39
21
taking it from the top, very general.
11:29:39
22
A.
Okay.
11:29:41
23
Q.
Are you aware of any evidence that
11:29:43
24
the Clayton F. Summy Co. authorized the
25
printing of the lyrics to Happy Birthday To You
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
781
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 106
1
in Program For Beginners' Department?
11:29:48
2
A.
No.
11:29:50
3
Q.
Are you aware of any evidence that
11:29:55
4
the Hill sisters authorized printing of Happy
11:29:57
5
Birthday To You in Program For Beginners'
11:29:57
6
Department?
11:29:57
7
A.
No.
11:29:59
8
Q.
Are you aware of any evidence that
11:30:03
they are even aware of the printing of Happy
11:30:05
10
Birthday To You in this volume, either the Hill
11:30:07
11
sisters or the Clayton F. Summy Co.?
11:30:08
9
12
A.
There is no direct evidence of
11:30:08
13
that. To that I might add, however,
that the
11:30:17
14
confusion in my mind about Song Stories came
11:30:21
15
from Exhibit A which is Song Stories For The
11:30:22
16
Kindergarten Published by Clayton F. Summy
11:30:24
17
Corporation which strikes me as probably
11:30:32
18
related to Song Stories For The Sunday School
11:30:35
19
because the title is the same.
11:30:37
20
So it strongly suggests that it is
11:30:40
21
Clayton F. Summy Company who is referred to in
11:30:43
22
footnote 2.
11:30:46
23
Birthday is in the collection Song Stories.
24
25
Q.
But it does not imply that Happy
Nor does it imply, does it,
11:30:49
that
Clayton F. Summy Co. authorized the printing of
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
782
JOEL SACHS,
Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 107
1
Happy Birthday To You in this volume; is that
11:30:54
2
right?
11:30:56
A.
3
No, it does imply that Clayton F.
11:30:59
4
Summy may have authorized the publication of
11:31:01
5
something in this volume, but it doesn't refer
11:31:02
6
specifically to Happy Birthday To You.
11:31:04
Q.
7
So just to be totally clear, you're
11:31:08
8
not offering any opinion that this is an authorized
11:31:11
9
publication of Happy Birthday To You by Clayton
11:31:14
F. Summy Co. or by the Hill sisters; correct?
11:31:27
10
11
A.
Not on the basis of any evidence.
11:31:29
12
Q.
Let's talk about paragraph 20.
11:31:33
In
13
paragraph 20 and it is referring to tab E,
11:31:38
14
Exhibit E.
11:31:45
15
entitled "The 101 Best Songs For Home School
11:31:50
16
And Meeting."
11:31:59
17
no copyright date, correct?
18
this was published, tab E?
A.
19
We are discussing a song book
And you note that this print has
Well,
I don't.
Do you know when
11: 32: 02
11:32:05
This was the first
11:32:08
20
of the compositions to provoke me to write
11: 32: 11
21
Nicholas Bell about the backwards based clef on
11:32:14
22
page 23.
Because that struck me as a very old
11: 32: 17
23
form of musical notation that one almost never
11:32:21
24
sees.
25
in the Julliard Library that was published in
And it happened that there was one song
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
783
JOEL SACHS,
Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 122
experience.
2
because you don't want to draw conclusions
11:48:59
3
based on experience that might not prove to be
11:49:00
4
valid.
11:49:02
5
Q.
You have to be careful about it
11:48:57
1
What I'm trying to define is what
11:49:04
6
is it about your experience that you're relying
11:49:06
7
on when you make some of these inferences?
11:49:07
8
A.
Exactly,
in this case it is from
11:49:10
looking at a lot of music that's comes out in
11:49:13
10
multiple editions and having some sense of the
11:49:15
11
time span they covered and therefore some sense
11:49:19
12
of perhaps a publisher's instinct about when it
11:49:21
13
is time to do a new edition.
11:49:27
9
You haven't done
11:49:30
15
any actual study of how frequent editions were
11:49:32
16
issued of music collections in the early 20th
11:49:33
17
century in America?
11:49:39
14
Q.
Just to clarify.
18
A.
That's correct.
11:49:46
19
Q.
In tab E this Good Morning To You
11:49:51
20
printing referred to as number 23 it says under
11:49:54
21
that Good-Bye To You, Happy Birthday To You, my
11:49:56
22
questions are going to be similar to those that
11:49:58
23
we already covered.
11:50:00
24
25
Do you have any evidence that the
Clayton F. Summy Co. was aware of this edition
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
784
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 123
1
11:50:08
of the printing of Good Morning To You?
2
A.
There is no evidence of that.
11:50:13
3
Q.
How about the Hill sisters, do you
11:50:15
4
have any evidence that they knew about this
11:50:17
5
version of Good Morning To You and Happy
11:50:17
6
Birthday To You?
11:50:19
A.
7
There is no evidence of that.
And
11:50:23
8
if I may add there is no evidence that they
11:50:23
9
wrote the thing.
11:50:24
10
11
Q.
A.
11:50:25
11:50:28
wrote what?
12
13
There is no evidence that they
Good Morning To You.
Number 23 in
11:50:29
11:50:38
that publication.
14
Q.
What about tab A?
11:50:40
15
A.
That is the one that we talked
11:50:44
16
about before.
17
composing and arranging and Patty Hill with
11:50:49
18
writing and adapting.
11:50:53
19
only of Good Morning To You which we know is by
11:50:54
20
them.
11:50:56
21
Q.
Where it credits Mildred J. Hill
And that is a publication
Why would you say the song Good
11:50:46
11:50:57
22
Morning To You there is no evidence that they
11:50:58
23
wrote the thing?
11:51:01
MR. RIFKIN:
24
25
A.
He said in tab E.
In tab E there is no evidence that
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
785
JOEL SACHS, Ph.D. - 9/9/2014
Page 126
1
song there that only occupied two staves, but
11:53:30
2
he didn't or she didn't do that.
11: 53: 32
Again, it implied to me that people
3
11:53:36
4
knew what the words of Happy Birthday were,
11:53:38
5
they didn't have to be printed.
11:53:43
6
one might say the reasons why Good Morning To
11:53:45
7
You is printed is because that was copyrighted,
11:53:46
8
we know that.
11:53:48
9
Q.
And perhaps
You said you don't have any
11:53:52
10
evidence that this is authorized or they knew
11:53:52
11
about it?
11:53:55
12
A.
No, but the implication is whoever
11:53:59
13
put this together felt that there was no need
14
to put the words of Happy Birthday in there.
I
11:54:04
15
think one can go on to say that since the words
11:54:09
16
of Good Morning To You are in there, Good
11:54:10
17
Morning To All along with the music, whether
11:54:14
18
this is a pirated edition, whoever put it
11:54:16
19
together seems to have respected the
11:54:19
20
association of those two which were
11:54:22
21
copyrighted.
11:54:22
22
association in mind between the Happy Birthday
11:54:25
23
words and anything else, but that so many
11:54:27
24
people knew them that there was no point in
25
fiddling around with the layout of this page in
11:54:01
And it may be that there was no
Merrill Corporation
800-826-0277
www.deposition.com/southern-california.htm
Ex. 64
786
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?