Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 196

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR THE PARTIES' CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 179 by Judge George H. King. The Court GRANTS the relief sought therein and hereby enters this order continuing the hearing date on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment to February 9, 2015 at 9:30a.m. (lom)

Download PDF
GLENN D. POMERANTZ (State Bar No. 112503) 1 glenn.pomerantz@mto.com KELLY M. KLAUS (State Bar No. 161091) 2 kelly.klaus@mto.com 3 MELINDA E. LeMOINE (State Bar No. 235670) melinda.lemoine@mto.com ADAM I. KAPLAN (State FILED: 12/18/14 4 adam.kaplan@mto.com Bar No. 268182) 5 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue 6 Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 7 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 8 Attorneys for Defendants Warner/Chappell 9 Music, Inc. and Summy-Birchard, Inc. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 WESTERN DIVISION 14 GOOD MORNING TO YOU 15 PRODUCTIONS CORP.; et al., Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx) 16 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING DATE FOR THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC., et al., 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 HAVING FOUND GOOD CAUSE appearing in the parties’ joint stipulation 2 to continue the hearing date on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the 3 Court GRANTS the relief sought therein and hereby enters this order continuing the 4 hearing date on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment to February 9, 5 2015 at 9:30a.m. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 Dated: 11 12 12/18/14 ____________________________________ HON. GEORGE H. KING, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?